Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 6/2014

01-12-2014 | REVIEW

Contributions from emerging transcriptomics technologies and computational strategies for drug discovery

Authors: Onat Kadioglu, Thomas Efferth

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Summary

Drug discovery involves various steps and is a long process being even more demanding for complex diseases such as cancer. Tumors are ensembles of subpopulations with different mutations, require very specific and effective strategies. Conventional drug screening technologies may not be adequate and efficient anymore. Drug repositioning is a useful strategy to identify new uses for previously failed drugs. High throughput and deep sequencing technologies provide valuable support by yielding enormous amounts of “-omics” data and contribute to understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for drug action. Computational methods coupled with systems biology represent a promising step to interpret pharmacogenomic data and establish strong connections with drug discovery. Genomic variations have been found to be linked with differential drug response among individuals. Large genome wide association studies are necessary to identify reliable connections between genomic variations and drug response since personalized medicine has been accepted as an important phenomenon in the drug discovery and development process post approval.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Kola I, Landis J (2004) Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:711–715CrossRefPubMed Kola I, Landis J (2004) Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:711–715CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dopazo J (2013) Genomics and transcriptomics in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today pii:S1359–6446(13):00166–9 Dopazo J (2013) Genomics and transcriptomics in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today pii:S1359–6446(13):00166–9
4.
go back to reference Stratton MR (2011) Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise. Science 331:1553–1558CrossRefPubMed Stratton MR (2011) Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise. Science 331:1553–1558CrossRefPubMed
5.
8.
go back to reference Moreau Y, Tranchevent LC (2012) Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet 13:523–536CrossRefPubMed Moreau Y, Tranchevent LC (2012) Computational tools for prioritizing candidate genes: boosting disease gene discovery. Nat Rev Genet 13:523–536CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Ashburn TT, Thor KB (2004) Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:673–683CrossRefPubMed Ashburn TT, Thor KB (2004) Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:673–683CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B (2007) In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling. Br J Pharmacol 152:9–20PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ekins S, Mestres J, Testa B (2007) In silico pharmacology for drug discovery: methods for virtual ligand screening and profiling. Br J Pharmacol 152:9–20PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
13.
go back to reference Sirota M, Dudley JT, Kim J, Chiang AP, Morgan AA, Sweet-Cordero A, Sage J, Butte AJ (2011) Discovery and preclinical validation of drug indications using compendia of public gene expression data. Sci Transl Med 3:96ra77PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Sirota M, Dudley JT, Kim J, Chiang AP, Morgan AA, Sweet-Cordero A, Sage J, Butte AJ (2011) Discovery and preclinical validation of drug indications using compendia of public gene expression data. Sci Transl Med 3:96ra77PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Feero WG, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS (2010) Genomic medicine—an updated primer. N Engl J Med 362:2001–2011CrossRefPubMed Feero WG, Guttmacher AE, Collins FS (2010) Genomic medicine—an updated primer. N Engl J Med 362:2001–2011CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference ENCODE Project Consortium, Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, Green ED, Gunter C, Snyder M (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57–74CrossRef ENCODE Project Consortium, Bernstein BE, Birney E, Dunham I, Green ED, Gunter C, Snyder M (2012) An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57–74CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Xue Y, Chen Y, Ayub Q, Huang N, Ball EV, Mort M, Phillips AD, Shaw K, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, Tyler-Smith C, 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) Deleterious- and disease-allele prevalence in healthy individuals: insights from current predictions, mutation databases, and population-scale resequencing. Am J Hum Genet 91:1022–1032PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Xue Y, Chen Y, Ayub Q, Huang N, Ball EV, Mort M, Phillips AD, Shaw K, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, Tyler-Smith C, 1000 Genomes Project Consortium (2012) Deleterious- and disease-allele prevalence in healthy individuals: insights from current predictions, mutation databases, and population-scale resequencing. Am J Hum Genet 91:1022–1032PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Carbonell J, Alloza E, Arce P, Borrego S, Santoyo J, Ruiz-Ferrer M, Medina I, Jiménez-Almazán J, Méndez-Vidal C, González-Del Pozo M, Vela A, Bhattacharya SS, Antiñolo G, Dopazo J (2012) A map of human microRNA variation uncovers unexpectedly high levels of variability. Genome Med 4:62PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Carbonell J, Alloza E, Arce P, Borrego S, Santoyo J, Ruiz-Ferrer M, Medina I, Jiménez-Almazán J, Méndez-Vidal C, González-Del Pozo M, Vela A, Bhattacharya SS, Antiñolo G, Dopazo J (2012) A map of human microRNA variation uncovers unexpectedly high levels of variability. Genome Med 4:62PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113CrossRefPubMed Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN (2004) Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 5:101–113CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Luo H, Chen J, Shi L, Mikailov M, Zhu H, Wang K, He L, Yang L (2011) DRAR-CPI: a server for identifying drug repositioning potential and adverse drug reactions via the chemical-protein interactome. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W492–W498PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Luo H, Chen J, Shi L, Mikailov M, Zhu H, Wang K, He L, Yang L (2011) DRAR-CPI: a server for identifying drug repositioning potential and adverse drug reactions via the chemical-protein interactome. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W492–W498PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zhao S, Li S (2012) A co-module approach for elucidating drug-disease associations and revealing their molecular basis. Bioinformatics 28:955–961CrossRefPubMed Zhao S, Li S (2012) A co-module approach for elucidating drug-disease associations and revealing their molecular basis. Bioinformatics 28:955–961CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, Martinez P, Matthews N, Stewart A, Tarpey P, Varela I, Phillimore B, Begum S, McDonald NQ, Butler A, Jones D, Raine K, Latimer C, Santos CR, Nohadani M, Eklund AC, Spencer-Dene B, Clark G, Pickering L, Stamp G, Gore M, Szallasi Z, Downward J, Futreal PA, Swanton C (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMed Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, Martinez P, Matthews N, Stewart A, Tarpey P, Varela I, Phillimore B, Begum S, McDonald NQ, Butler A, Jones D, Raine K, Latimer C, Santos CR, Nohadani M, Eklund AC, Spencer-Dene B, Clark G, Pickering L, Stamp G, Gore M, Szallasi Z, Downward J, Futreal PA, Swanton C (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366:883–892CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Creixell P, Schoof EM, Erler JT, Linding R (2012) Navigating cancer network attractors for tumor-specific therapy. Nat Biotechnol 30:842–848CrossRefPubMed Creixell P, Schoof EM, Erler JT, Linding R (2012) Navigating cancer network attractors for tumor-specific therapy. Nat Biotechnol 30:842–848CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel M, Lerner J, Brunet JP, Subramanian A, Ross KN, Reich M, Hieronymus H, Wei G, Armstrong SA, Haggarty SJ, Clemons PA, Wei R, Carr SA, Lander E, Golub TR (2006) The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 313:1929–1935CrossRefPubMed Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel M, Lerner J, Brunet JP, Subramanian A, Ross KN, Reich M, Hieronymus H, Wei G, Armstrong SA, Haggarty SJ, Clemons PA, Wei R, Carr SA, Lander E, Golub TR (2006) The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science 313:1929–1935CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Contributions from emerging transcriptomics technologies and computational strategies for drug discovery
Authors
Onat Kadioglu
Thomas Efferth
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-014-0081-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Investigational New Drugs 6/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine