Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 2/2014

Open Access 01-04-2014 | PHASE I STUDIES

A phase I study of the oral gamma secretase inhibitor R04929097 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors (PHL-078/CTEP 8575)

Authors: Suzanne Richter, Philippe L. Bedard, Eric Xueyu Chen, Blaise A. Clarke, Ben Tran, Sebastien J. Hotte, Anastasios Stathis, Hal W. Hirte, Albiruni R. A. Razak, Michael Reedijk, Zhuo Chen, Brenda Cohen, Wen-Jiang Zhang, Lisa Wang, S. Percy Ivy, Malcolm J. Moore, Amit M. Oza, Lillian L. Siu, Elaine McWhirter

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose To establish the recommended phase II dose of the oral γ-secretase inhibitor RO4929097 (RO) in combination with gemcitabine; secondary objectives include the evaluation of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, biomarkers of Notch signaling and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled in cohorts of escalating RO dose levels (DLs). Tested RO DLs were 20 mg, 30 mg, 45 mg and 90 mg. RO was administered orally, once daily on days 1–3, 8–10, 15–17, 22–24. Gemcitabine was administered at 1,000 mg/m2 on d1, 8, and 15 in 28 d cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were assessed by CTCAE v4. Serial plasma was collected for RO (total and unbound) and gemcitabine pharmacokinetic analysis. Biomarkers of Notch signaling were assessed by immunohistochemistry in archival tissue. Antitumor activity was evaluated (RECIST 1.1). Results A total of 18 patients were enrolled to establish the recommended phase II dose. Of these, 3 patients received 20 mg RO, 7 patients received 30 mg RO, 6 patients received 45 mg RO and 2 patients received 90 mg RO. DLTs were grade 3 transaminitis (30 mg RO), grade 3 transaminitis and maculopapular rash (45 mg RO), and grade 3 transaminitis and failure to receive 75 % of planned RO doses secondary to prolonged neutropenia (90 mg); all were reversible. The maximum tolerated dose was exceeded at 90 mg RO. Pharmacokinetic analysis of both total and free RO confirmed the presence of autoinduction at 45 and 90 mg. Median levels of Notch3 staining were higher in individuals who received fewer than 4 cycles (p = 0.029). Circulating angiogenic factor levels did not correlate with time to progression or ≥ grade 3 adverse events. Best response (RECIST 1.1) was partial response (nasopharyngeal cancer) and stable disease > 4 months was observed in 3 patients (pancreas, tracheal, and breast primary cancers). Conclusions RO and gemcitabine can be safely combined. The recommended phase II dose of RO was 30 mg in combination with gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2. Although RO exposure was limited by the presence of autoinduction, RO levels achieved exceeded the area under the concentration-time curve for 0–24 h (AUC0–24) predicted for efficacy in preclinical models using daily dosing. Evidence of clinical antitumor activity and prolonged stable disease were identified.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miele L, Miao H, Nickoloff BJ (2006) NOTCH signaling as a novel cancer therapeutic target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 6:313–323CrossRefPubMed Miele L, Miao H, Nickoloff BJ (2006) NOTCH signaling as a novel cancer therapeutic target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 6:313–323CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bolos V, Grego-Bessa J, de la Pompa JL (2007) Notch signaling in development and cancer. Endocr Rev 28:339–363CrossRefPubMed Bolos V, Grego-Bessa J, de la Pompa JL (2007) Notch signaling in development and cancer. Endocr Rev 28:339–363CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Jarriault S, Le Bail O, Hirsinger E, Pourquie O, Logeat F, Strong CF et al (1998) Delta-1 activation of Notch-1 signaling results in HES-1 transactivation. Mol Cell Biol 18(12):7423–7431PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jarriault S, Le Bail O, Hirsinger E, Pourquie O, Logeat F, Strong CF et al (1998) Delta-1 activation of Notch-1 signaling results in HES-1 transactivation. Mol Cell Biol 18(12):7423–7431PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Klinakis A, Szabolcs M, Politi K, Golde T, Osborne B, Miele L (2006) Myc is a Notch1 transcriptional target and a requisite for Notch1-induced mammary tumorigenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9262–9267PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Klinakis A, Szabolcs M, Politi K, Golde T, Osborne B, Miele L (2006) Myc is a Notch1 transcriptional target and a requisite for Notch1-induced mammary tumorigenesis in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9262–9267PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rizzo P, Osipo C, Foreman K et al (2008) Rationale targeting of Notch signaling in cancer. Oncogene 27:5124–5131CrossRefPubMed Rizzo P, Osipo C, Foreman K et al (2008) Rationale targeting of Notch signaling in cancer. Oncogene 27:5124–5131CrossRefPubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Plentz R, Park JS, Rhim AD, Abravanel D, Hezel AF, Sharma SV et al (2009) Inhibition of gamma-secretase activity inhibits tumor progression in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 136:1741–1749 e6PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Plentz R, Park JS, Rhim AD, Abravanel D, Hezel AF, Sharma SV et al (2009) Inhibition of gamma-secretase activity inhibits tumor progression in a mouse model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 136:1741–1749 e6PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Luistro L, He W, Smith M, Packman K, Vilenchik M, Carvajal D et al (2009) Preclinical profile of a potent gamma-secretase inhibitor targeting notch signaling with in vivo efficacy and pharmacodynamic properties. Cancer Res 69:7672–7680CrossRefPubMed Luistro L, He W, Smith M, Packman K, Vilenchik M, Carvajal D et al (2009) Preclinical profile of a potent gamma-secretase inhibitor targeting notch signaling with in vivo efficacy and pharmacodynamic properties. Cancer Res 69:7672–7680CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tolcher A, Messersmith W, Mikulski SM, Papadopoulos KP, Kwak EL, Gibbon DG et al (2012) Phase I study of RO4929097, a gamma secretase inhibitor of Notch signaling, in patients with refractory metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 30:2348–2353CrossRefPubMed Tolcher A, Messersmith W, Mikulski SM, Papadopoulos KP, Kwak EL, Gibbon DG et al (2012) Phase I study of RO4929097, a gamma secretase inhibitor of Notch signaling, in patients with refractory metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 30:2348–2353CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Wu J, Lorusso PM, Matherly LH, Li J (2012) Implications of plasma protein binding for pharmacokinetcs and pharmacodynamics of the g-secretase inhibitor RO4929097. Clin Cancer Res 18(7):2066–2079CrossRefPubMed Wu J, Lorusso PM, Matherly LH, Li J (2012) Implications of plasma protein binding for pharmacokinetcs and pharmacodynamics of the g-secretase inhibitor RO4929097. Clin Cancer Res 18(7):2066–2079CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Moorsel C, Peters GJ, Pinedo HM (1997) Gemcitabine: future prospects of single-agent and combination studies. Oncologist 2:127–134PubMed Van Moorsel C, Peters GJ, Pinedo HM (1997) Gemcitabine: future prospects of single-agent and combination studies. Oncologist 2:127–134PubMed
13.
go back to reference Cook N, Frese KK, Bapiro TE, Jacobetz MA, Gopinathan A, Miller JL (2012) Gamma secretase inhibition promotes hypoxic necrosis in mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Exp Med 209(3):437–444PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Cook N, Frese KK, Bapiro TE, Jacobetz MA, Gopinathan A, Miller JL (2012) Gamma secretase inhibition promotes hypoxic necrosis in mouse pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. J Exp Med 209(3):437–444PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Carmeliet P, DeSmet F, Loges S, Mazzone M (2009) Branching morphogenesis and antiangiogenesis candidates: tip cells lead the way. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6:315–e326CrossRefPubMed Carmeliet P, DeSmet F, Loges S, Mazzone M (2009) Branching morphogenesis and antiangiogenesis candidates: tip cells lead the way. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6:315–e326CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumors: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Zhang W, Seymour L, Chen EX (2008) Determination of intact oxaliplatin in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatography B 876:277–282CrossRef Zhang W, Seymour L, Chen EX (2008) Determination of intact oxaliplatin in human plasma using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatography B 876:277–282CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168PubMed Allred DC, Harvey JM, Berardo M, Clark GM (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168PubMed
18.
go back to reference Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H, Lockwood G, O’Malley FP, Egan SE et al (2007) High-lvel JAG1 mRNA and protein predict poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 20:685–693CrossRefPubMed Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H, Lockwood G, O’Malley FP, Egan SE et al (2007) High-lvel JAG1 mRNA and protein predict poor outcome in breast cancer. Mod Pathol 20:685–693CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Reedijk M, Pinnaduwage D, Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H, Bull SB et al (2008) JAG1 expression is associated with a basal phenotype and recurrence in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:439–448CrossRefPubMed Reedijk M, Pinnaduwage D, Dickson BC, Mulligan AM, Zhang H, Bull SB et al (2008) JAG1 expression is associated with a basal phenotype and recurrence in lymph node-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 111:439–448CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Strosberg JR, Yeatman T, Weber J, Coppola D, Schell MJ, Han G et al (2012) A phase II study of RO4929097 in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 48(7):997–1003PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Strosberg JR, Yeatman T, Weber J, Coppola D, Schell MJ, Han G et al (2012) A phase II study of RO4929097 in metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 48(7):997–1003PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Krop I, Demuth T, Guthrie T, Wen PY, Mason WP, Chinnaiyan P et al (2011) Phase I pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic study of the gamma secretase (Notch) inhibitor MK-0752 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 30(19):2307–2313CrossRef Krop I, Demuth T, Guthrie T, Wen PY, Mason WP, Chinnaiyan P et al (2011) Phase I pharmacologic and pharmacodynamic study of the gamma secretase (Notch) inhibitor MK-0752 in adult patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 30(19):2307–2313CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Dang TP, Gazdar AF, Virmani AK, Sepetavec T, Hande KR, Minna JD et al (2000) Chromosome 19 translocation, overexpression of Notch3, and human lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1355–e1357CrossRefPubMed Dang TP, Gazdar AF, Virmani AK, Sepetavec T, Hande KR, Minna JD et al (2000) Chromosome 19 translocation, overexpression of Notch3, and human lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1355–e1357CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference He W, Luistro L, Carvajal D, Smith M, Nevins T, Yin X et al (2011) High tumor levels of IL6 and IL8 abrogate preclinical efficacy of the g-secretase inhibitor, RO4929097. Mol Oncol 5(3):292–301CrossRefPubMed He W, Luistro L, Carvajal D, Smith M, Nevins T, Yin X et al (2011) High tumor levels of IL6 and IL8 abrogate preclinical efficacy of the g-secretase inhibitor, RO4929097. Mol Oncol 5(3):292–301CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A phase I study of the oral gamma secretase inhibitor R04929097 in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors (PHL-078/CTEP 8575)
Authors
Suzanne Richter
Philippe L. Bedard
Eric Xueyu Chen
Blaise A. Clarke
Ben Tran
Sebastien J. Hotte
Anastasios Stathis
Hal W. Hirte
Albiruni R. A. Razak
Michael Reedijk
Zhuo Chen
Brenda Cohen
Wen-Jiang Zhang
Lisa Wang
S. Percy Ivy
Malcolm J. Moore
Amit M. Oza
Lillian L. Siu
Elaine McWhirter
Publication date
01-04-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-013-9965-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Investigational New Drugs 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine