Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 5/2008

01-10-2008 | PHASE I STUDIES

Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors

Authors: Michael J. Overman, Gauri Varadhachary, Scott Kopetz, Melanie B. Thomas, Masakazu Fukushima, Keizo Kuwata, Akira Mita, Robert A. Wolff, Paulo M. Hoff, Henry Xiong, James L. Abbruzzese

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Summary

This study was designed to determine the safety and optimal dosing of TAS-102, a novel oral combination of ααα-trifluorothymidine (FTD) and an inhibitor of thymidine phoshorylase, in patients with solid tumors. Patients who met the eligibility criteria were treated with one of two different TAS-102 regimens: once per day on either days 1–5 and 8–12 every 4 weeks (schedule A) or days 1–5 every 3 weeks (schedule B). The primary objectives were the determination of the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and recommended phase II dose. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted during courses 1 and 2. Sixty-three patients received a total of 172 courses of therapy with the median number of courses delivered on both schedules being 2. DLTs were observed in three patients on schedule A, 70 mg/m2/day (1) and 110 mg/m2/day (2); and in five patients on schedule B, 120 mg/m2/day (1), 170 mg/m2/day (2), 180 mg/m2/day (2). Granulocytopenia was the DLT in seven of the eight cases. The most frequent toxicities were nausea, fatigue, granulocytopenia, anemia, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. Twelve patients, 6 on schedule A and 6 on schedule B, were treated at the recommended phase II dose, with good tolerance. No objective responses were seen in this heavily pretreated, 5-FU-refractory population. The pharmacokinetic parameters of FTD are a T max of 0.53 to 3.15 h, t 1/2 of 1.46 to 4.20 h, volume of distribution of 0.0526 to 0.483 l/kg, and clearance of 0.0194 to 0.197 1/h/kg. The recommended phase II doses for TAS-102 are 100 mg/m2/day on schedule A and 160 mg/m2/day on schedule B. Future development of TAS-102 should focus upon multiple daily dosing schedules.
Literature
1.
go back to reference No authors listed (1992) Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project. J Clin Oncol 10(6):896–903 No authors listed (1992) Modulation of fluorouracil by leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: evidence in terms of response rate. Advanced Colorectal Cancer Meta-Analysis Project. J Clin Oncol 10(6):896–903
2.
go back to reference Miwa M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34(8):1274–1281PubMedCrossRef Miwa M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34(8):1274–1281PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Schuller J et al (2000) Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 45(4):291–297PubMedCrossRef Schuller J et al (2000) Preferential activation of capecitabine in tumor following oral administration to colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 45(4):291–297PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5):330–338PubMedCrossRef Longley DB, Harkin DP, Johnston PG (2003) 5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 3(5):330–338PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Emura T et al (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13(4):545–549PubMed Emura T et al (2004) A novel antimetabolite, TAS-102 retains its effect on FU-related resistant cancer cells. Int J Mol Med 13(4):545–549PubMed
6.
go back to reference Temmink OH et al (2005) Determinants of trifluorothymidine sensitivity and metabolism in colon and lung cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs 16(3):285–292PubMedCrossRef Temmink OH et al (2005) Determinants of trifluorothymidine sensitivity and metabolism in colon and lung cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs 16(3):285–292PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ansfield FJ, Ramirez G (1971) Phase I and II studies of 2¢-deoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)-uridine (NSC-75520). Cancer Chemother Rep 55(2):205–208PubMed Ansfield FJ, Ramirez G (1971) Phase I and II studies of 2¢-deoxy-5-(trifluoromethyl)-uridine (NSC-75520). Cancer Chemother Rep 55(2):205–208PubMed
8.
go back to reference Heidelberger C, Dexter DL, Wolberg WH (1970) Clinical pharmacology of 5-trifluoromethyl-2-deoxyuridine (F3TDR). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 35 Heidelberger C, Dexter DL, Wolberg WH (1970) Clinical pharmacology of 5-trifluoromethyl-2-deoxyuridine (F3TDR). Proc Am Assoc Cancer Res 35
9.
go back to reference Emura T et al (2005) Potentiation of the antitumor activity of alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo. Int J Oncol 27(2):449–455PubMed Emura T et al (2005) Potentiation of the antitumor activity of alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluorothymidine by the co-administration of an inhibitor of thymidine phosphorylase at a suitable molar ratio in vivo. Int J Oncol 27(2):449–455PubMed
10.
go back to reference Temmink OH et al (2007) Therapeutic potential of the dual-targeted TAS-102 formulation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer Sci 98(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef Temmink OH et al (2007) Therapeutic potential of the dual-targeted TAS-102 formulation in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer Sci 98(6):779–789PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ciccolini J, Evrard A, Cuq P (2004) Thymidine phosphorylase and fluoropyrimidines efficacy: a Jekyll and Hyde story. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 4(2):71–81PubMedCrossRef Ciccolini J, Evrard A, Cuq P (2004) Thymidine phosphorylase and fluoropyrimidines efficacy: a Jekyll and Hyde story. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 4(2):71–81PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Emura T et al (2004) Thymidine kinase and thymidine phosphorylase level as the main predictive parameter for sensitivity to TAS-102 in a mouse model. Oncol Rep 11(2):381–387PubMed Emura T et al (2004) Thymidine kinase and thymidine phosphorylase level as the main predictive parameter for sensitivity to TAS-102 in a mouse model. Oncol Rep 11(2):381–387PubMed
13.
go back to reference Emura T et al (2004) A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol 25(3):571–578PubMed Emura T et al (2004) A novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, exhibits antitumor activity in FU-resistant human cancer cells through a mechanism involving FTD incorporation in DNA. Int J Oncol 25(3):571–578PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hong DS et al (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107(6):1383–1390PubMedCrossRef Hong DS et al (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of oral administration of TAS-102 in patients with solid tumors. Cancer 107(6):1383–1390PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sadahiro S et al (2001) A pharmacological study of the weekday-on/weekend-off oral UFT schedule in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 47(5):457–460PubMedCrossRef Sadahiro S et al (2001) A pharmacological study of the weekday-on/weekend-off oral UFT schedule in colorectal cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 47(5):457–460PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sadahiro S et al (1998) Preliminary study on the optimal dosage schedule for oral Tegafur/Uracil (UFT) chemotherapy. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3:7–12CrossRef Sadahiro S et al (1998) Preliminary study on the optimal dosage schedule for oral Tegafur/Uracil (UFT) chemotherapy. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 3:7–12CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Green MC, P.L., Theriault RL et al. (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):10576 (June 20 Supplement) Green MC, P.L., Theriault RL et al. (2006) Phase I study to determine the safety of oral administration of TAS-102 on a twice daily (BID) schedule for five days a week (wk) followed by two days rest for two wks, every (Q) four wks in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):10576 (June 20 Supplement)
19.
go back to reference Wolff RA, H.P., Mita A, et al. (2006) A phase I trial of TAS-102 administered on a three times a day schedule in patients with solid tumors. 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):2053 (June 20 Supplement) Wolff RA, H.P., Mita A, et al. (2006) A phase I trial of TAS-102 administered on a three times a day schedule in patients with solid tumors. 2006 ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings Part I. J Clin Oncol 24(18S):2053 (June 20 Supplement)
20.
go back to reference Temmink OH et al (2006) Low folate conditions may enhance the interaction of trifluorothymidine with antifolates in colon cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57(2):171–179PubMedCrossRef Temmink OH et al (2006) Low folate conditions may enhance the interaction of trifluorothymidine with antifolates in colon cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 57(2):171–179PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Emura T et al (2004) An optimal dosing schedule for a novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, based on its intracellular metabolism and its incorporation into DNA. Int J Mol Med 13(2):249–255PubMed Emura T et al (2004) An optimal dosing schedule for a novel combination antimetabolite, TAS-102, based on its intracellular metabolism and its incorporation into DNA. Int J Mol Med 13(2):249–255PubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase 1 study of TAS-102 administered once daily on a 5-day-per-week schedule in patients with solid tumors
Authors
Michael J. Overman
Gauri Varadhachary
Scott Kopetz
Melanie B. Thomas
Masakazu Fukushima
Keizo Kuwata
Akira Mita
Robert A. Wolff
Paulo M. Hoff
Henry Xiong
James L. Abbruzzese
Publication date
01-10-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-008-9142-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Investigational New Drugs 5/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine