Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022

16-04-2022 | Gastrectomy | Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Making It Stick: Management of Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma with Poorly-Cohesive Cells (PCC)

Authors: Damien Bouriez, Caroline Gronnier, Haythem Najah, Denis Collet

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Excerpt

A 61-year-old man was seen in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic due to recurrent heartburn. Five years prior, he had experienced gastroesophageal acid reflux symptoms that were treated with proton pump inhibitors for 4 months. Since that first episode, he had neither clinical follow-up nor endoscopic evaluation. At presentation, he described moderate dysphagia but he had not lost weight, weighing 94 kg. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy demonstrated an esophageal tumor, extending 35–42 cm from the incisors from the distal esophagus, without stenosis, to the lesser curvature of the stomach. Mucosal biopsies demonstrated adenocarcinoma with poorly cohesive cells (PCC), conferring a poor prognosis. Preoperative evaluation, included a thoraco-abdominal CT scan (Fig. 1) and a PET scan (Fig. 2) concluded that the patient had a large gastroesophageal junctional tumor classified as Siewert I-II-III extending from the lower esophagus to the lesser curvature of the stomach (Fig. 3). A pretherapeutic laparoscopy did not show any peritoneal metastases. Perioperative chemotherapy was given according to the FLOT regimen: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel [1]. The patient did not experience any toxicity. A re-evaluation by CT scan performed 2 weeks after the end of the chemotherapy demonstrated tumor stability without progression.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mariette C, Carneiro F, Grabsch HI et al. Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1–9.CrossRef Mariette C, Carneiro F, Grabsch HI et al. Consensus on the pathological definition and classification of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:1–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Piessen G, Messager M, Leteurtre E, Jean-Pierre T, Mariette C. Signet ring cell histology is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma regardless of tumoral clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:878–887.CrossRef Piessen G, Messager M, Leteurtre E, Jean-Pierre T, Mariette C. Signet ring cell histology is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in gastric adenocarcinoma regardless of tumoral clinical presentation. Ann Surg. 2009;250:878–887.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gronnier C, Messager M, Robb WB et al. Is the negative prognostic impact of signet ring cell histology maintained in early gastric adenocarcinoma? Surgery. 2013;154:1093–1099.CrossRef Gronnier C, Messager M, Robb WB et al. Is the negative prognostic impact of signet ring cell histology maintained in early gastric adenocarcinoma? Surgery. 2013;154:1093–1099.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dupas J-L. COMITE D’ORGANISATION. 2001;7. Dupas J-L. COMITE D’ORGANISATION. 2001;7.
5.
go back to reference Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): Guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy. 2012;44:74–94.CrossRef Dinis-Ribeiro M, Areia M, de Vries AC et al. Management of precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS): Guideline from the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter Study Group (EHSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and the Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED). Endoscopy. 2012;44:74–94.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dumonceau J-M, Deprez PH, Jenssen C et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:695–714.CrossRef Dumonceau J-M, Deprez PH, Jenssen C et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated January 2017. Endoscopy. 2017;49:695–714.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ahn HS, Lee H-J, Yoo M-W et al. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:20–27.CrossRef Ahn HS, Lee H-J, Yoo M-W et al. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99:20–27.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Honoré C, Goéré D, Messager M et al. Risk factors of peritoneal recurrence in eso-gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinoma: Results of a multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:235–241.CrossRef Honoré C, Goéré D, Messager M et al. Risk factors of peritoneal recurrence in eso-gastric signet ring cell adenocarcinoma: Results of a multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:235–241.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference van der Kaaij RT, Snaebjornsson P, Voncken FEM et al. The prognostic and potentially predictive value of the Laurén classification in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;76:27–35.CrossRef van der Kaaij RT, Snaebjornsson P, Voncken FEM et al. The prognostic and potentially predictive value of the Laurén classification in oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2017;76:27–35.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Raziee HR, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R et al. Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:S116-124.CrossRef Raziee HR, Cardoso R, Seevaratnam R et al. Systematic review of the predictors of positive margins in gastric cancer surgery and the effect on survival. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15:S116-124.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–2668.CrossRef Bickenbach KA, Gonen M, Strong V, Brennan MF, Coit DG. Association of positive transection margins with gastric cancer survival and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2663–2668.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Marrelli D, Polom K, Pascale V et al. Strong prognostic value of microsatellite instability in intestinal type non-cardia gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:943–950.CrossRef Marrelli D, Polom K, Pascale V et al. Strong prognostic value of microsatellite instability in intestinal type non-cardia gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:943–950.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Al-Batran S-E, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): Results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1697–1708.CrossRef Al-Batran S-E, Hofheinz RD, Pauligk C et al. Histopathological regression after neoadjuvant docetaxel, oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine in patients with resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4-AIO): Results from the phase 2 part of a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1697–1708.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang K, Li E, Busuttil RA et al. A cohort study and meta-analysis of the evidence for consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920930359.PubMedPubMedCentral Wang K, Li E, Busuttil RA et al. A cohort study and meta-analysis of the evidence for consideration of Lauren subtype when prescribing adjuvant or palliative chemotherapy for gastric cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2020;12:1758835920930359.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Heger U, Blank S, Wiecha C et al. Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1739–1748.CrossRef Heger U, Blank S, Wiecha C et al. Is preoperative chemotherapy followed by surgery the appropriate treatment for signet ring cell containing adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction and stomach? Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:1739–1748.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–1203.CrossRef Kelly RJ, Ajani JA, Kuzdzal J et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–1203.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Muro K, Chung HC, Shankaran V et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): A multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:717–726.CrossRef Muro K, Chung HC, Shankaran V et al. Pembrolizumab for patients with PD-L1-positive advanced gastric cancer (KEYNOTE-012): A multicentre, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:717–726.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kang Y-K, Boku N, Satoh T et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–2471.CrossRef Kang Y-K, Boku N, Satoh T et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–2471.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Berlth F, Kim W-H, Choi J-H et al. Prognostic impact of frozen section investigation and extent of proximal safety margin in gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2020;272:871–878.CrossRef Berlth F, Kim W-H, Choi J-H et al. Prognostic impact of frozen section investigation and extent of proximal safety margin in gastric cancer resection. Ann Surg. 2020;272:871–878.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v38-49.CrossRef Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:v38-49.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Spicer J, Benay C, Lee L et al. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2580–2586.CrossRef Spicer J, Benay C, Lee L et al. Diagnostic accuracy and utility of intraoperative microscopic margin analysis of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2580–2586.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:159–164.CrossRef Reslinger V, Tranchart H, D’Annunzio E et al. Esophageal reconstruction by colon interposition after esophagectomy for cancer analysis of current indications, operative outcomes, and long-term survival. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:159–164.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bilosi M, Bernard A, Favre JP et al. Coloplasty after esophagectomy in cancer. A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality. Ann Chir. 1999;53:854–8.PubMed Bilosi M, Bernard A, Favre JP et al. Coloplasty after esophagectomy in cancer. A retrospective study of morbidity and mortality. Ann Chir. 1999;53:854–8.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Coevoet D, Van Daele E, Willaert W et al. Quality of life of patients with a colonic interposition postoesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:1113–1120.CrossRef Coevoet D, Van Daele E, Willaert W et al. Quality of life of patients with a colonic interposition postoesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:1113–1120.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cense HA, Visser MRM, van Sandick JW et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88:32–38.CrossRef Cense HA, Visser MRM, van Sandick JW et al. Quality of life after colon interposition by necessity for esophageal cancer replacement. J Surg Oncol. 2004;88:32–38.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Making It Stick: Management of Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma with Poorly-Cohesive Cells (PCC)
Authors
Damien Bouriez
Caroline Gronnier
Haythem Najah
Denis Collet
Publication date
16-04-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-022-07437-4

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022 Go to the issue