Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2022

10-01-2022 | Probiotics | Original Article

Appropriateness of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Chronic Pouchitis Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology

Authors: Gaurav Syal, Miles P. Sparrow, Fernando Velayos, Adam S. Cheifetz, Shane Devlin, Peter M. Irving, Gilaad G. Kaplan, Laura E. Raffals, Thomas Ullman, Krisztina B. Gecse, Phillip R. Fleshner, Amy L. Lightner, Corey A. Siegel, Gil Y. Melmed

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

The treatment of chronic pouchitis remains a challenge due to the paucity of high-quality studies. We aimed to provide guidance for clinicians on the appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in chronic pouchitis.

Methods

Appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in patients with chronic pouchitis was considered in 16 scenarios incorporating presence/absence of four variables: pouchitis symptoms, response to antibiotics, significant prepouch ileitis, and Crohn’s disease (CD)-like complications (i.e., stricture or fistula). Appropriateness of permanent ileostomy in patients refractory to medical treatments was considered in eight additional scenarios. Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, international IBD expert panelists rated appropriateness of treatments in each scenario on a 1–9 scale.

Results

Chronic antibiotic therapy was rated appropriate only in asymptomatic antibiotic-dependent patients with no CD-like complications and inappropriate in all other scenarios. Ileal-release budesonide was rated appropriate in 6/16 scenarios including patients with significant prepouch ileitis but no CD-like complications. Probiotics were considered either inappropriate (14/16) or uncertain (2/16). Biologic therapy was considered appropriate in most scenarios (14/16) and uncertain in situations where significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications were absent (2/16). In patients who are refractory to all medications, permanent ileostomy was considered appropriate in all scenarios (7/8) except in asymptomatic patients with no CD-like complications.

Conclusions

In the presence of significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications, chronic antibiotics and probiotics are inappropriate. Biologics are appropriate in all patients except in asymptomatic patients with no evidence of complications. Permanent ileostomy is appropriate in most medically refractory patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Madiba TE, Bartolo DC. Pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: incidence and therapeutic outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001;46:334–337.PubMed Madiba TE, Bartolo DC. Pouchitis following restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: incidence and therapeutic outcome. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001;46:334–337.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Huguet M, Pereira B, Goutte M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: anti-tnf therapy in refractory pouchitis and crohn's disease-like complications of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:261–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izx049 Huguet M, Pereira B, Goutte M, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: anti-tnf therapy in refractory pouchitis and crohn's disease-like complications of the pouch after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2018;24:261–268. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​ibd/​izx049
Metadata
Title
Appropriateness of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Chronic Pouchitis Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology
Authors
Gaurav Syal
Miles P. Sparrow
Fernando Velayos
Adam S. Cheifetz
Shane Devlin
Peter M. Irving
Gilaad G. Kaplan
Laura E. Raffals
Thomas Ullman
Krisztina B. Gecse
Phillip R. Fleshner
Amy L. Lightner
Corey A. Siegel
Gil Y. Melmed
Publication date
10-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07362-y

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2022 Go to the issue