Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022

03-11-2021 | Colonoscopy | Original Article

Repeat Cold Snare Polypectomy Can Be Performed for Recurrent Benign Lesions After Cold Snare Polypectomy

Authors: Naohisa Yoshida, Hikaru Hashimoto, Ken Inoue, Reo Kobayashi, Yuri Tomita, Satoshi Sugino, Ryohei Hirose, Osamu Dohi, Yukiko Morinaga, Yutaka Inada, Takaaki Murakami, Yoshito Itoh

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

Recurrence after cold snare polypectomy (CSP) sometimes occurs. We assessed the feasibility of repeat CSP for recurrence after CSP.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed recurrent lesions after CSP which were resected by repeat CSP from 2016 to 2021 in our institution and analyzed clinical outcomes of repeat CSP, comparing those of non-recurrent 454 lesions receiving standard CSP in 2016 and follow-up colonoscopy. We also analyzed the recurrent rate among cases receiving follow-up in both groups. Indication of repeat CSP was lesions diagnosed as benign tumors of ≤ 10 mm.

Results

We analyzed 80 lesions receiving repeat CSP. The polyp size (mean ± standard deviation: SD) was 4.1 ± 2.3 mm (range 2–10 mm). The right-sided colon and non-polypoid morphology rates were 66.3% and 43.8%, respectively. Histopathological diagnosis was 66 adenomas, 12 sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), 1 SSL with dysplasia, and 1 high-grade dysplasia. The procedure time (min, mean ± SD) of repeat CSP was 0.9 ± 0.8. Regarding the comparison of repeat CSP/ standard CSP group, the en bloc resection and histopathological complete resection rates were 78.8%/ 98.0% (p < 0.001) and 43.8%/59.6% (p = 0.007) and the rates of perioperative hemorrhage requiring endoscopic clipping were 1.3%/ 1.0% (p = 0.646). There were no postoperative hemorrhage and perforation in both groups (p = 1.0). Among lesions receiving follow-up colonoscopy, the mean recurrence rates (number, median follow-up period: interquartile) of repeat CSP and standard CSP group were 2.0% (1/50, 12 months: 12–24) versus 0.7% (3/454, 12 months: 12–24) (p = 0.862).

Conclusions

Repeat CSP for benign recurrent lesions after CSP was safe and feasible.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:27–31.CrossRef Repici A, Hassan C, Vitetta E et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10 mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012;44:27–31.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:417–423.CrossRef Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M et al. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:417–423.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018;67:1950–1957.CrossRef Kawamura T, Takeuchi Y, Asai S et al. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4–9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial (CRESCENT study). Gut. 2018;67:1950–1957.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tate DJ, Awadie H, Bahin FF et al. Wide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe. Endoscopy. 2018;50:248–252.CrossRef Tate DJ, Awadie H, Bahin FF et al. Wide-field piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of large sessile serrated polyps without a submucosal injection is safe. Endoscopy. 2018;50:248–252.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49:270–297.CrossRef Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017;49:270–297.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:376–380.CrossRef Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:376–380.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Inoue K, Dohi O et al. Efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with full or partial circumferential incision using a snare tip for difficult colorectal lesions. Endoscopy. 2019;51:871–876.CrossRef Yoshida N, Inoue K, Dohi O et al. Efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with full or partial circumferential incision using a snare tip for difficult colorectal lesions. Endoscopy. 2019;51:871–876.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Murakami T, Yoshida N, Yasuda R et al. Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:2918–2925.CrossRef Murakami T, Yoshida N, Yasuda R et al. Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:2918–2925.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–533.CrossRef Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:526–533.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Dohi O, Inoue K et al. Blue laser imaging, blue light imaging, and linked color imaging for the detection and characterization of colorectal tumors. Gut Liver. 2019;13:140–148.CrossRef Yoshida N, Dohi O, Inoue K et al. Blue laser imaging, blue light imaging, and linked color imaging for the detection and characterization of colorectal tumors. Gut Liver. 2019;13:140–148.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N et al. Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:117–123.CrossRef Yamashina T, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N et al. Diagnostic features of sessile serrated adenoma/polyps on magnifying narrow band imaging: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:117–123.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Participants in the Paris workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: Esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1. 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;58:S3-S43. Participants in the Paris workshop. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: Esophagus, stomach, and colon-November 30 to December 1. 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;58:S3-S43.
14.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Dohi O, Inoue K et al. The efficacy of tumor characterization and tumor detectability of linked color imaging and blue laser imaging with an LED endoscope compared to a LASER endoscope. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:815–825.CrossRef Yoshida N, Dohi O, Inoue K et al. The efficacy of tumor characterization and tumor detectability of linked color imaging and blue laser imaging with an LED endoscope compared to a LASER endoscope. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020;35:815–825.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours. Digestive system tumours. 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. 2019:532–534. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours. Digestive system tumours. 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. 2019:532–534.
16.
go back to reference Shichijo S, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N. Management of local recurrence after endoscopic resection of neoplastic colonic polyps. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;10:378–382.CrossRef Shichijo S, Takeuchi Y, Uedo N. Management of local recurrence after endoscopic resection of neoplastic colonic polyps. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;10:378–382.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al. Treatment strategy for recurrent or residual colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:255–260.CrossRef Sakamoto T, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al. Treatment strategy for recurrent or residual colorectal tumors after endoscopic resection. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:255–260.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Suzuki T, Kitagawa Y, Nankinzan R et al. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019;82:375–378.PubMed Suzuki T, Kitagawa Y, Nankinzan R et al. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for recurrent colorectal tumors after endoscopic mucosal resection. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2019;82:375–378.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim HG, Thosani N, Banerjee S et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:1094–1102.CrossRef Kim HG, Thosani N, Banerjee S et al. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for recurrences after previous piecemeal resection of colorectal polyps (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:1094–1102.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:225–230.CrossRef Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009;24:225–230.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tutticci NJ, Hewett DG. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:837–842.CrossRef Tutticci NJ, Hewett DG. Cold EMR of large sessile serrated polyps at colonoscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:837–842.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mangira D, Cameron K, Simons K et al. Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:1343–1352.CrossRef Mangira D, Cameron K, Simons K et al. Cold snare piecemeal EMR of large sessile colonic polyps ≥20 mm (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91:1343–1352.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Inoue K, Tomita Y et al. Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow-up is needed: A single-center retrospective study: A single-center retrospective study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9:370–377.CrossRef Yoshida N, Inoue K, Tomita Y et al. Cold snare polypectomy for large sessile serrated lesions is safe but follow-up is needed: A single-center retrospective study: A single-center retrospective study. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9:370–377.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hirose R, Yoshida N, Murakami T et al. Histological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10–14 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:594–601.CrossRef Hirose R, Yoshida N, Murakami T et al. Histological analysis of cold snare polypectomy and its indication for colorectal polyps 10–14 mm in diameter. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:594–601.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Repeat Cold Snare Polypectomy Can Be Performed for Recurrent Benign Lesions After Cold Snare Polypectomy
Authors
Naohisa Yoshida
Hikaru Hashimoto
Ken Inoue
Reo Kobayashi
Yuri Tomita
Satoshi Sugino
Ryohei Hirose
Osamu Dohi
Yukiko Morinaga
Yutaka Inada
Takaaki Murakami
Yoshito Itoh
Publication date
03-11-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Colonoscopy
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07292-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022 Go to the issue