Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2022

27-10-2021 | Colonoscopy | Original Article

Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Detection Using a New Preparation-Free, Colon-Scan Capsule: A Pilot Study of Safety and Patient Satisfaction

Authors: Ana Garcia Garcia de Paredes, Seth A. Gross, Ariosto H. Hernandez-Lara, Stephanie L. Hansel, David M. Poppers, Elizabeth Rajan

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 8/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Current strategies to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) vary considerably regarding safety, invasiveness, and patient satisfaction. A known deterrent for patients is the required bowel cleansing for colonoscopy. A new colon-scan capsule system is a unique preparation-free approach that provides structural information on colonic mucosa intended for detection of colorectal polyps and masses.

Aims

The aim of this study was to determine safety and patient satisfaction with the colon-scan capsule.

Methods

Prospective single-arm pilot study conducted at two tertiary care centers. Patients with a pre-scheduled colonoscopy for CRC screening or surveillance were included. Patients participating in this study underwent the colon-scan capsule and colonoscopy. Safety was defined by the occurrence of procedure or device-related adverse events. Satisfaction was based on survey questionnaires using a scoring system 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Patient satisfaction with the colon-scan capsule was compared to colonoscopy.

Results

Forty patients were included (52.9 [5.7] years; 64.1% females). There were no serious adverse events and no occurrences of capsule retention. The most common (12.5%) complaint was self-limiting abdominal cramping. Satisfaction questionnaires were completed by more than 87% of patients, with patients likely to recommend the capsule (score 4.1 [1.03]) compared to colonoscopy (score 2.8 [1.2]), p = 0.001.

Conclusions

The new prepless colon-scan capsule system is an innovative, minimally invasive technology with demonstrated safety and high patient satisfaction. A multicenter pivotal study is planned to validate the performance, safety, and accuracy of polyp detection using the capsule system in comparison with colonoscopy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:7–30.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467.CrossRef Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ. 2014;348:g2467.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD et al. Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1383–1391.CrossRef Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD et al. Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1383–1391.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Doubeni CA, Corley DA, Quinn VP et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study. Gut. 2018;67:291–298.CrossRef Doubeni CA, Corley DA, Quinn VP et al. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study. Gut. 2018;67:291–298.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.CrossRef Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:687–696.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA et al. Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:18–33.CrossRef Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA et al. Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:18–33.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3186–3194.CrossRef Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ, Melton LJ 3rd. A prospective, controlled assessment of factors influencing acceptance of screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:3186–3194.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRef Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gluck N, Shpak B, Brun R et al. A novel prepless X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening. Gut. 2016;65:371–373.CrossRef Gluck N, Shpak B, Brun R et al. A novel prepless X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening. Gut. 2016;65:371–373.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gluck N, Half EE, Bieber V et al. Novel prep-less X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening: a feasibility study. Gut. 2019;68:774–775.CrossRef Gluck N, Half EE, Bieber V et al. Novel prep-less X-ray imaging capsule for colon cancer screening: a feasibility study. Gut. 2019;68:774–775.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference de Gonzalez AB, Kim KP, Yee J. CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:279–291.CrossRef de Gonzalez AB, Kim KP, Yee J. CT colonography: perforation rates and potential radiation risks. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010;20:279–291.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Joseph DA, King JB, Dowling NF, Thomas CC, Richardson LC. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:253–259.CrossRef Joseph DA, King JB, Dowling NF, Thomas CC, Richardson LC. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use - United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69:253–259.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:666–671.CrossRef Beebe TJ, Johnson CD, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Limburg PJ. Assessing attitudes toward laxative preparation in colorectal cancer screening and effects on future testing: potential receptivity to computed tomographic colonography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82:666–671.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context–a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86:137–146.CrossRef McLachlan SA, Clements A, Austoker J. Patients’ experiences and reported barriers to colonoscopy in the screening context–a systematic review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;86:137–146.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:264–270.CrossRef Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:264–270.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kimchy Y, Lifshitz R, Lewkowitz S et al. Radiographic capsule-based system for non-cathartic colorectal cancer screening. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1291–1297.CrossRef Kimchy Y, Lifshitz R, Lewkowitz S et al. Radiographic capsule-based system for non-cathartic colorectal cancer screening. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:1291–1297.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hong SN, Kang SH, Jang HJ, Wallace MB. Recent advance in colon capsule endoscopy: what’s new? Clin Endosc. 2018;51:334–343.CrossRef Hong SN, Kang SH, Jang HJ, Wallace MB. Recent advance in colon capsule endoscopy: what’s new? Clin Endosc. 2018;51:334–343.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Detection Using a New Preparation-Free, Colon-Scan Capsule: A Pilot Study of Safety and Patient Satisfaction
Authors
Ana Garcia Garcia de Paredes
Seth A. Gross
Ariosto H. Hernandez-Lara
Stephanie L. Hansel
David M. Poppers
Elizabeth Rajan
Publication date
27-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 8/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07289-4

Other articles of this Issue 8/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 8/2022 Go to the issue