Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022

Open Access 18-07-2021 | Vancomycin | Review

Heterogeneity of Randomized Controlled Trials of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

Authors: Paul Feuerstadt, MD, FACG, AGAF, Olga C. Aroniadis, MD, MSc, Felicia L. Svedlund, PhD, Mariana Garcia, PhD, PMP, Laura Stong, PhD, Mena Boules, MD, Sahil Khanna, MBBS

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of FMT for reduction in CDI recurrences (rCDI), but this treatment and its reporting in the literature has significant heterogeneity. Recent publications (e.g., Ramai et al. in Dig Dis Sci 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10620-020-06185-7) present the clinical outcomes for different FMT methodologies. However, to understand, compare, and contextualize outcomes, this heterogeneity in methods and reporting must be understood.

Methods

We performed a literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of FMT for rCDI to evaluate heterogeneity among trials. A methodical search between January 2010 and May 2019 of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted for studies investigating FMT in adults with rCDI. RCTs were evaluated for a variety of methodological and reporting criteria.

Results

Eight RCTs were identified, wherein 14 different FMT preparations were considered (each with distinct protocols for processing, storage, administration, and dosing). Sample sizes were generally small, with only two studies performing FMT in more than 100 patients. Three studies used non-FMT controls (vancomycin), while the remaining compared FMT with differing routes of administration or formulations. Across the identified studies, there was no standardized manner for reporting the timing of the FMT procedure. All studies tracked adverse events; however, follow-up periods were limited.

Conclusions

Considerable variability exists among RCTs, with marked differences in study design, control groups, and outcome assessment. Lack of a standard-of-care control in many trials may impact reproducibility of FMT trial outcomes in patients with rCDI. Widespread use of FMT for rCDI is still investigational; therefore, these foundational studies provide opportunities to optimize future trials.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ng K. Updates in the management of Clostridium difficile for adults. US Pharm 2019;44:9–12. Ng K. Updates in the management of Clostridium difficile for adults. US Pharm 2019;44:9–12.
5.
6.
go back to reference Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:479–493. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14201.CrossRefPubMed Quraishi MN, Widlak M, Bhala N, Moore D, Price M, Sharma N et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46:479–493. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apt.​14201.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ramai D, Zakhia K, Fields PJ, Ofosu A, Patel G, Shahnazarian V et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with colonoscopy is superior to enema and nasogastric tube while comparable to capsule for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7.CrossRefPubMed Ramai D, Zakhia K, Fields PJ, Ofosu A, Patel G, Shahnazarian V et al. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) with colonoscopy is superior to enema and nasogastric tube while comparable to capsule for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2020. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10620-020-06185-7.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cammarota G, Masucci L, Ianiro G, Bibbo S, Dinoi G, Costamagna G et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:835–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13144.CrossRefPubMed Cammarota G, Masucci L, Ianiro G, Bibbo S, Dinoi G, Costamagna G et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation by colonoscopy vs. vancomycin for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41:835–43. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apt.​13144.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hota SS, Sales V, Tomlinson G, Salpeter MJ, McGeer A, Coburn B et al. Oral vancomycin followed by fecal transplantation versus tapering oral vancomycin treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw731.CrossRefPubMed Hota SS, Sales V, Tomlinson G, Salpeter MJ, McGeer A, Coburn B et al. Oral vancomycin followed by fecal transplantation versus tapering oral vancomycin treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: an open-label, randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:265–271. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​cid/​ciw731.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Jiang ZD, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Jun G, Hanis CL, Shah M et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridum difficile infection—fresh, or frozen, or lyophilised microbiota from a small pool of healthy donors delivered by colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:899–908. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13969.CrossRefPubMed Jiang ZD, Ajami NJ, Petrosino JF, Jun G, Hanis CL, Shah M et al. Randomised clinical trial: faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridum difficile infection—fresh, or frozen, or lyophilised microbiota from a small pool of healthy donors delivered by colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:899–908. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​apt.​13969.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rokkas T, Gisbert JP, Gasbarrini A, Hold GL, Tilg H, Malfertheiner P et al. A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials exploring the role of fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:1051–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640619854587.CrossRef Rokkas T, Gisbert JP, Gasbarrini A, Hold GL, Tilg H, Malfertheiner P et al. A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials exploring the role of fecal microbiota transplantation in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:1051–1063. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1177/​2050640619854587​.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Patron RL, Hartmann CA, Allen S, Griesbach CL, Kosiorek HE, DiBaise JK et al. Vancomycin taper and risk of failure of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:1214–1217.CrossRef Patron RL, Hartmann CA, Allen S, Griesbach CL, Kosiorek HE, DiBaise JK et al. Vancomycin taper and risk of failure of fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:1214–1217.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Heterogeneity of Randomized Controlled Trials of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection
Authors
Paul Feuerstadt, MD, FACG, AGAF
Olga C. Aroniadis, MD, MSc
Felicia L. Svedlund, PhD
Mariana Garcia, PhD, PMP
Laura Stong, PhD
Mena Boules, MD
Sahil Khanna, MBBS
Publication date
18-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07141-9

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022 Go to the issue