Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022

12-07-2021 | Pancreatitis | Original Article

Endoscopic Management of Ampullary Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Pooled Analysis

Authors: Daryl Ramai, Antonio Facciorusso, Jameel Singh, Olivia W. Brooks, Houman Mirtorabi, Mohamed Barakat, Andrew Ofosu, Stephanie Mcdonough, Douglas G. Adler, MD

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic papillectomy is a viable therapy in ampullary lesions. Prior studies have reported on outcomes of sporadic ampullary lesions, and only small cohort studies have reported outcomes associated with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome.

Aims

We performed a systematic review with pooled analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of EP for treating ampullary adenomas in FAP.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive literature search of major databases from inception to May 2020. Studies that included patients with endoscopically resected ampullary lesions and FAP were eligible. The rate of technical success, en bloc resection, piecemeal resection, recurrence, and adverse events was pooled by means of a random-effects model to obtain a proportion with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results

Six studies, including a total of 99 patients, were included in our final analysis. Patient age ranged from 28 to 91 years. Pooled technical success was 90.3% (CI 76.9–96.3%, I2 = 31%). Rate of en bloc resection was 60.6% (CI 47.9–72.0%, I2 = 0%). Recurrence rate was 25.4% (5.7–65.9%, I2 = 82%). The post-procedural pancreatitis rate was 14.7% of which 68% (51 of 75) utilized prophylactic pancreatic stenting. Other adverse events included bleeding (9.2%) and perforation (4%).

Conclusion

Endoscopic papillectomy offers high technical success but remains challenging in patients with FAP, particularly due to high recurrence rates.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Caspari R, Friedl W, Mandl M et al. Familial adenomatous polyposis: mutation at codon 1309 and early onset of colon cancer. The Lancet. 1994;343:629–632.CrossRef Caspari R, Friedl W, Mandl M et al. Familial adenomatous polyposis: mutation at codon 1309 and early onset of colon cancer. The Lancet. 1994;343:629–632.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM et al. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:223–263.CrossRef Syngal S, Brand RE, Church JM et al. ACG clinical guideline: Genetic testing and management of hereditary gastrointestinal cancer syndromes. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:223–263.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Hirota WK, Zuckerman MJ, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:570–580.CrossRef Hirota WK, Zuckerman MJ, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:570–580.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gluck N, Strul H, Rozner G et al. Endoscopy and EUS are key for effective surveillance and management of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:960–966.CrossRef Gluck N, Strul H, Rozner G et al. Endoscopy and EUS are key for effective surveillance and management of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:960–966.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Matsumoto T, Iida M, Nakamura S et al. Natural history of ampullary adenoma in familial adenomatous polyposis: reconfirmation of benign nature during extended surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1557–1562.CrossRef Matsumoto T, Iida M, Nakamura S et al. Natural history of ampullary adenoma in familial adenomatous polyposis: reconfirmation of benign nature during extended surveillance. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1557–1562.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Brosens LA, Keller JJ, Offerhaus GJ et al. Prevention and management of duodenal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. 2005;54:1034–1043.CrossRef Brosens LA, Keller JJ, Offerhaus GJ et al. Prevention and management of duodenal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gut. 2005;54:1034–1043.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sarmiento JM, Thompson GB, Nagorney DM et al. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for duodenal polyposis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:557–562.CrossRef Sarmiento JM, Thompson GB, Nagorney DM et al. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for duodenal polyposis. Arch Surg. 2002;137:557–562.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference van Heumen BW, Nieuwenhuis MH, van Goor H et al. Surgical management for advanced duodenal adenomatosis and duodenal cancer in Dutch patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Surgery. 2012;151:681–690.CrossRef van Heumen BW, Nieuwenhuis MH, van Goor H et al. Surgical management for advanced duodenal adenomatosis and duodenal cancer in Dutch patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a nationwide retrospective cohort study. Surgery. 2012;151:681–690.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–2127.CrossRef Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE et al. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2117–2127.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference De Palma GD. Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1537–1543.CrossRef De Palma GD. Endoscopic papillectomy: indications, techniques, and results. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:1537–1543.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Augustin T, Moslim MA, Tang A et al. Tailored surgical treatment of duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Surgery. 2018;163:594–599.CrossRef Augustin T, Moslim MA, Tang A et al. Tailored surgical treatment of duodenal polyposis in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome. Surgery. 2018;163:594–599.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Alderlieste YA, Bastiaansen BA, Mathus-Vliegen EM et al. High rate of recurrent adenomatosis during endoscopic surveillance after duodenectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:699–706.CrossRef Alderlieste YA, Bastiaansen BA, Mathus-Vliegen EM et al. High rate of recurrent adenomatosis during endoscopic surveillance after duodenectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. Fam Cancer. 2013;12:699–706.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g7647.CrossRef Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g7647.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell PJ. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011. Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell PJ. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011.
16.
go back to reference DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.CrossRef DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177–188.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sutton AJAK, Jones DR et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. New York: Wiley; 2000. Sutton AJAK, Jones DR et al. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. New York: Wiley; 2000.
18.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009;172:137–159.CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 2009;172:137–159.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011;342:d549.CrossRef Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ. Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 2011;342:d549.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mohan BP, Adler DG. Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:902–903.CrossRef Mohan BP, Adler DG. Heterogeneity in systematic review and meta-analysis: how to read between the numbers. Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89:902–903.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557–560.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kanwal F, White D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1184–1186.CrossRef Kanwal F, White D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012;10:1184–1186.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–302.CrossRef Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294–302.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867–872.CrossRef Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R et al. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991;337:867–872.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455–463.CrossRef Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455–463.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. New York: Wiley; 2006. Rothstein HR, Sutton AJ, Borenstein M. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. New York: Wiley; 2006.
27.
go back to reference Angsuwatcharakan P, Ahmed O, Lynch PM et al. Management of ampullary adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome: 16 years of experience from a tertiary cancer center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:323–330.CrossRef Angsuwatcharakan P, Ahmed O, Lynch PM et al. Management of ampullary adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome: 16 years of experience from a tertiary cancer center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:323–330.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Cecinato P, Parmeggiani F, Braglia L et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenomas: different outcomes in sporadic tumors and those associated with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:457–466.CrossRef Cecinato P, Parmeggiani F, Braglia L et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary adenomas: different outcomes in sporadic tumors and those associated with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:457–466.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Lee R, Huelsen A, Gupta S, Hourigan LF. Endoscopic ampullectomy for non-invasive ampullary lesions: a single-center 10-year retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2020;25:1–9. Lee R, Huelsen A, Gupta S, Hourigan LF. Endoscopic ampullectomy for non-invasive ampullary lesions: a single-center 10-year retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2020;25:1–9.
30.
go back to reference Laleman W, Verreth A, Topal B et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3865–3876.CrossRef Laleman W, Verreth A, Topal B et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3865–3876.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ma T, Jang EJ, Zukerberg LR et al. Recurrences are common after endoscopic ampullectomy for adenoma in the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2349–2356.CrossRef Ma T, Jang EJ, Zukerberg LR et al. Recurrences are common after endoscopic ampullectomy for adenoma in the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2349–2356.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ismail S, Marianne U, Heikki J et al. Endoscopic papillectomy, single-centre experience. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3234–3239.CrossRef Ismail S, Marianne U, Heikki J et al. Endoscopic papillectomy, single-centre experience. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3234–3239.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Spigelman AD, Talbot IC, Penna C et al. Evidence for adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group (Upper Gastrointestinal Committee). J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:709–10.CrossRef Spigelman AD, Talbot IC, Penna C et al. Evidence for adenoma-carcinoma sequence in the duodenum of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. The Leeds Castle Polyposis Group (Upper Gastrointestinal Committee). J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:709–10.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Winter JM, Cameron JL, Olino K et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of ampullary neoplasms in 450 patients: implications for surgical strategy and long-term prognosis. Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:379–387.CrossRef Winter JM, Cameron JL, Olino K et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of ampullary neoplasms in 450 patients: implications for surgical strategy and long-term prognosis. Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:379–387.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ceppa EP, Burbridge RA, Rialon KL et al. Endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy: an algorithm to treat disease of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 2013;257:315–322.CrossRef Ceppa EP, Burbridge RA, Rialon KL et al. Endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy: an algorithm to treat disease of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 2013;257:315–322.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Spadaccini M, Fugazza A, Frazzoni L et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: a systematic review with pooled analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:44–51.CrossRef Spadaccini M, Fugazza A, Frazzoni L et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for neoplastic ampullary lesions: a systematic review with pooled analysis. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2020;8:44–51.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ridtitid W, Tan D, Schmidt SE et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:289–296.CrossRef Ridtitid W, Tan D, Schmidt SE et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: risk factors for incomplete resection and recurrence during long-term follow-up. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:289–296.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Poley JW, Campos S. Methods and outcome of the endoscopic treatment of ampullary tumors. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;13:2631774519899786.PubMedPubMedCentral Poley JW, Campos S. Methods and outcome of the endoscopic treatment of ampullary tumors. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;13:2631774519899786.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Bhatt A, Mankaney G, Burke CA. Approach to resection of adenomas of the papilla: should familial adenomatous polyposis change the approach? Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:331–333.CrossRef Bhatt A, Mankaney G, Burke CA. Approach to resection of adenomas of the papilla: should familial adenomatous polyposis change the approach? Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92:331–333.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:367–370.CrossRef Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:367–370.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Endoscopic Management of Ampullary Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome: A Systematic Review with Pooled Analysis
Authors
Daryl Ramai
Antonio Facciorusso
Jameel Singh
Olivia W. Brooks
Houman Mirtorabi
Mohamed Barakat
Andrew Ofosu
Stephanie Mcdonough
Douglas G. Adler, MD
Publication date
12-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07132-w

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2022 Go to the issue