Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Colonoscopy | Original Article

Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates

Authors: James L. Araujo, Palashkumar Jaiswal, Karthik Ragunathan, Fray M. Arroyo-Mercado, Gurasees S. Chawla, Canny Li, Wajiha Kazmi, Alexander Le, Nikita Gupta, Tanuj Chokshi, Christopher A. Klinger, Sabrin Salim, Raza M. Mirza, Evan Grossman, Shivakumar Vignesh

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

An endoscopist’s adenoma detection rate (ADR) is inversely related to interval colorectal cancer risk and cancer mortality. Previous studies evaluating the impact of gastroenterology fellow participation in colonoscopy on ADR have generated conflicting results.

Aims

We aimed to determine the impact of fellow participation, duration of fellowship training, and physician sex on ADR and advanced ADR (AADR).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed average-risk patients undergoing screening colonoscopy at Veterans Affairs New York Harbor Healthcare System Brooklyn Campus and Kings County Hospital Center. Review of colonoscopy and pathology reports were performed to obtain adenoma-specific details, including the presence of advanced adenoma and adenoma location (right vs. left colon).

Results

There were 893 colonoscopies performed by attending only and 502 performed with fellow participation. Fellow participation improved overall ADR (44.6% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001), right-sided ADR (34.1% vs. 25.2%, p < 0.001), and AADR (15.3% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001); however, these findings were institution-specific. Year of fellowship training did not impact overall ADR or overall AADR, but did significantly improve right-sided AADR (p-value for trend 0.03). Female attending physicians were associated with increased ADR (47.1% vs. 37.0%, p = 0.0037). Fellow sex did not impact ADR.

Conclusions

Fellow participation in colonoscopy improved overall ADR and AADR, and female attending physicians were associated with improved ADR. Year of fellowship training did not impact overall ADR or AADR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977–1981 Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1977–1981
2.
go back to reference Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687–696CrossRef Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O’Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687–696CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298–1306CrossRef Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med 2014;370:1298–1306CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795–1803CrossRef Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795–1803CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:72–90CrossRef Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2015;110:72–90CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Mehrotra A, Dellon ES, Schoen RE et al. Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:e1214 Mehrotra A, Dellon ES, Schoen RE et al. Applying a natural language processing tool to electronic health records to assess performance on colonoscopy quality measures. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:e1214
7.
go back to reference Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013;62:236–241CrossRef Adler A, Wegscheider K, Lieberman D et al. Factors determining the quality of screening colonoscopy: a prospective study on adenoma detection rates, from 12,134 examinations (Berlin colonoscopy project 3, BECOP-3). Gut 2013;62:236–241CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2014;46:203–211CrossRef Lee TJ, Rees CJ, Blanks RG et al. Colonoscopic factors associated with adenoma detection in a national colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2014;46:203–211CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:e775 Mehrotra A, Morris M, Gourevitch RA et al. Physician characteristics associated with higher adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:e775
10.
go back to reference Cadoni S, Falt P, Rondonotti E et al. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2017;49:456–467CrossRef Cadoni S, Falt P, Rondonotti E et al. Water exchange for screening colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 2017;49:456–467CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cohen J, Grunwald D, Grossberg LB, Sawhney MS. The effect of right colon retroflexion on adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017;51:818–824CrossRef Cohen J, Grunwald D, Grossberg LB, Sawhney MS. The effect of right colon retroflexion on adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2017;51:818–824CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Min M, Deng P, Zhang W et al. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:724–730CrossRef Min M, Deng P, Zhang W et al. Comparison of linked color imaging and white-light colonoscopy for detection of colorectal polyps: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;86:724–730CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chalifoux SL, Rao DS, Wani SB et al. Trainee participation and adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopies. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014;48:524–529CrossRef Chalifoux SL, Rao DS, Wani SB et al. Trainee participation and adenoma detection rates during screening colonoscopies. J Clin Gastroenterol 2014;48:524–529CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gianotti RJ, Oza SS, Tapper EB et al. A longitudinal study of adenoma detection rate in gastroenterology fellowship training. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:2831–2837CrossRef Gianotti RJ, Oza SS, Tapper EB et al. A longitudinal study of adenoma detection rate in gastroenterology fellowship training. Dig Dis Sci 2016;61:2831–2837CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB et al. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:439–442CrossRef Peters SL, Hasan AG, Jacobson NB et al. Level of fellowship training increases adenoma detection rates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:439–442CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Qayed E, Shea L, Goebel S et al. Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017;9:204–210CrossRef Qayed E, Shea L, Goebel S et al. Association of trainee participation with adenoma and polyp detection rates. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017;9:204–210CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Friedman M, Arora G, Green J. Fellow involvement during colonoscopy does not reduce adenoma detection rate. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:919CrossRef Friedman M, Arora G, Green J. Fellow involvement during colonoscopy does not reduce adenoma detection rate. Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:919CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Eckardt AJ, Kheder J, Basil A et al. Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up. Endosc Int Open 2020;8:E1732–E1740CrossRef Eckardt AJ, Kheder J, Basil A et al. Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up. Endosc Int Open 2020;8:E1732–E1740CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim YD, Bae WK, Choi YH et al. Difference in adenoma detection rates according to colonoscopic withdrawal times and the level of expertise. Korean J Gastroenterol 2014;64:278–283CrossRef Kim YD, Bae WK, Choi YH et al. Difference in adenoma detection rates according to colonoscopic withdrawal times and the level of expertise. Korean J Gastroenterol 2014;64:278–283CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Takahashi M et al. Trainee participation during colonoscopy adversely affects polyp and adenoma detection rates. Digestion 2011;84:245–246CrossRef Nishizawa T, Suzuki H, Takahashi M et al. Trainee participation during colonoscopy adversely affects polyp and adenoma detection rates. Digestion 2011;84:245–246CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Tonti P et al. Impact of fellow participation on colon adenoma detection rates: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;92:1228–1235CrossRef Facciorusso A, Buccino VR, Tonti P et al. Impact of fellow participation on colon adenoma detection rates: a multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2020;92:1228–1235CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:172–180CrossRef Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR et al. Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:172–180CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shrubsole MJ, Wu H, Ness RM et al. Alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, and risk of colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1050–1058CrossRef Shrubsole MJ, Wu H, Ness RM et al. Alcohol drinking, cigarette smoking, and risk of colorectal adenomatous and hyperplastic polyps. Am J Epidemiol 2008;167:1050–1058CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Laiyemo AO, Doubeni C, Sanderson AK 2nd et al. Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:253–261CrossRef Laiyemo AO, Doubeni C, Sanderson AK 2nd et al. Likelihood of missed and recurrent adenomas in the proximal versus the distal colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:253–261CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Triantafyllou K. Effect of fellow involvement on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2019;51:1079–1085CrossRef Tziatzios G, Gkolfakis P, Triantafyllou K. Effect of fellow involvement on colonoscopy outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2019;51:1079–1085CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533–2541CrossRef Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533–2541CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33–36CrossRef Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33–36CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Impact of Fellow Participation During Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rates
Authors
James L. Araujo
Palashkumar Jaiswal
Karthik Ragunathan
Fray M. Arroyo-Mercado
Gurasees S. Chawla
Canny Li
Wajiha Kazmi
Alexander Le
Nikita Gupta
Tanuj Chokshi
Christopher A. Klinger
Sabrin Salim
Raza M. Mirza
Evan Grossman
Shivakumar Vignesh
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06887-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.