Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022

01-01-2022 | Endoscopy | Original Article

Acceptability and Adequacy of a Non-endoscopic Cell Collection Device for Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus: Lessons Learned

Authors: Nicholas J. Shaheen, Srinadh Komanduri, V. Raman Muthusamy, Sachin Wani, Maria O’Donovan, Rajinder Kaushal, John M. Haydek

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is common, costly, and underperformed in at-risk people. A non-endoscopic cell collection device can be used to collect esophageal cells, enabling BE screening.

Aims

This study assessed the acceptability and adequacy of a commercial non-endoscopic cell collection device in a US population.

Methods

Six sites enrolled patients with confirmed BE or heartburn/regurgitation for ≥ 6 months. Patients underwent administration of the device, consisting of a sponge encapsulated in a capsule. The capsule dwelled in the stomach for 7.5 min and was retracted via an attached suture. An adequate sample was ≥ 1 columnar cell by H&E staining. Sample quality was rated using a 0–5 scale, with 0 = no columnar cells and 5 = plentiful groups. Trefoil Factor 3 (TFF3) staining was performed. Accuracy was assessed using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)/biopsy as the gold standard.

Results

Of 191 patients, 99.5% successfully swallowed the device. Overall sample adequacy was 91% (171/188), with 84% (158/188) high quality. The detachment rate was 2/190 (1%). Overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assay with TFF3 staining were 76%, 77%, and 76%. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for ≥ 3 cm BE were 86%, 77%, and 82%. Asked if willing to repeat the procedure, 93% would, and 65% indicated a preference for the device over EGD.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a high rate of sample adequacy and promising acceptability of this non-endoscopic sampling device in a US population. Diagnostic characteristics suggest that non-endoscopic assessment of BE deserves further development as an alternative to endoscopy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pohl H, Sirovich B, Welch HG. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1468–1470CrossRef Pohl H, Sirovich B, Welch HG. Esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence: are we reaching the peak? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1468–1470CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091CrossRef Spechler SJ, Sharma P, Souza RF, Inadomi JM, Shaheen NJ. American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement on the management of Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1084–1091CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Abrams JA, Kapel RC, Lindberg GM et al. Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett’s esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:736–742CrossRef Abrams JA, Kapel RC, Lindberg GM et al. Adherence to biopsy guidelines for Barrett’s esophagus surveillance in the community setting in the United States. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7:736–742CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Montgomery E, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:368–378CrossRef Montgomery E, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR et al. Reproducibility of the diagnosis of dysplasia in Barrett esophagus: a reaffirmation. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:368–378CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ormsby AH, Petras RE, Henricks WH et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of superficial oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2002;51:671–676CrossRef Ormsby AH, Petras RE, Henricks WH et al. Observer variation in the diagnosis of superficial oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Gut. 2002;51:671–676CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012;143:1179–1187CrossRef Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 2012;143:1179–1187CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Acceptability and Adequacy of a Non-endoscopic Cell Collection Device for Diagnosis of Barrett’s Esophagus: Lessons Learned
Authors
Nicholas J. Shaheen
Srinadh Komanduri
V. Raman Muthusamy
Sachin Wani
Maria O’Donovan
Rajinder Kaushal
John M. Haydek
Publication date
01-01-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-06833-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 1/2022 Go to the issue