Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Article

Survey Study on the Practice Patterns of the Evaluation and Management of Incidental Pancreatic Cysts

Authors: Donevan Westerveld, April Goddard, Nieka Harris, Vikas Khullar, Justin Forde, Peter V. Draganov, Chris E. Forsmark, Dennis Yang

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aims

Various gastrointestinal societies have released guidelines on the evaluation of asymptomatic pancreatic cysts (PCs). These guidelines differ on several aspects, which create a conundrum for clinicians. The aim of this study was to evaluate preferences and practice patterns in the management of incidental PCs in light of these societal recommendations.

Methods

An electronic survey distributed to members of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). Main outcomes included practice setting (academic vs. community), preferences for evaluation, management, and surveillance strategies for PCs.

Results

A total of 172 subjects completed the study (52% academic-based endoscopists). Eighty-six (50%) and 138 (80%) of the participants responded that they would recommend EUS surveillance of incidental PCs measuring less than 2 cm and 3 cm, respectively. Nearly half of the endosonographers (42.5% community and 44% academic; p = 1.0) would routinely perform FNA on PCs without any high-risk features. More academic-based endoscopists (57% academic vs. 32% community; p = 0.001) would continue incidental PC surveillance indefinitely.

Conclusions

There is significant variability in the approach of incidental PCs among clinicians, with practice patterns often diverging from the various GI societal guideline recommendations. Most survey respondents would routinely recommend EUS-FNA and indefinite surveillance for incidental PCs without high-risk features. The indiscriminate use of EUS-FNA and indefinite surveillance of all incidental PCs is not cost-effective, exposes the patient to unnecessary testing, and can further perpetuate diagnostic uncertainty. Well-designed studies are needed to improve our diagnostic and risk stratification accuracy in order to formulate a consensus on the management of these incidental PCs.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I. Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2079–2084.CrossRefPubMed Lee KS, Sekhar A, Rofsky NM, Pedrosa I. Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2079–2084.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:796–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Canto MI, Hruban RH, Fishman EK, et al. Frequent detection of pancreatic lesions in asymptomatic high-risk individuals. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:796–804.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1218–1226.CrossRefPubMed Brugge WR, Lauwers GY, Sahani D, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Warshaw AL. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1218–1226.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Khashab MA, Kim K, Lennon AM, et al. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? The incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over CT/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas. 2013;42:717–721.CrossRefPubMed Khashab MA, Kim K, Lennon AM, et al. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? The incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over CT/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas. 2013;42:717–721.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:824–848.e22.CrossRefPubMed Scheiman JM, Hwang JH, Moayyedi P. American gastroenterological association technical review on the diagnosis and management of asymptomatic neoplastic pancreatic cysts. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:824–848.e22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Elta GH, Enestvedt BK, Sauer BG, Lennon AM. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(4):464–479.CrossRefPubMed Elta GH, Enestvedt BK, Sauer BG, Lennon AM. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of pancreatic cysts. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113(4):464–479.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–197.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka M, Fernández-del Castillo C, Adsay V, et al. International consensus guidelines 2012 for the management of IPMN and MCN of the pancreas. Pancreatology. 2012;12:183–197.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lee KH, Kim EY, Cho J, et al. Risk Factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee KH, Kim EY, Cho J, et al. Risk Factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0189347.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Siddiqui AA, Shahid H, Shah A, et al. High risk of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 2015;4:109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Siddiqui AA, Shahid H, Shah A, et al. High risk of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of side branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Endoscopic Ultrasound. 2015;4:109.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Pergolini I, Sahora K, Ferrone CR, et al. Long-term risk of pancreatic malignancy in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a referral center. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:1284.e1–1294.e1.CrossRef Pergolini I, Sahora K, Ferrone CR, et al. Long-term risk of pancreatic malignancy in patients with branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm in a referral center. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:1284.e1–1294.e1.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kwong WT, Hunt GC, Fehmi SM, et al. Low rates of malignancy and mortality in asymptomatic patients with suspected neoplastic pancreatic cysts beyond 5 years of surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:865–871.CrossRefPubMed Kwong WT, Hunt GC, Fehmi SM, et al. Low rates of malignancy and mortality in asymptomatic patients with suspected neoplastic pancreatic cysts beyond 5 years of surveillance. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:865–871.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Han Y, Lee H, Kang JS, et al. Progression of pancreatic branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm associates with cyst size. Gastroenterology. 2017;154:576–584.CrossRefPubMed Han Y, Lee H, Kang JS, et al. Progression of pancreatic branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm associates with cyst size. Gastroenterology. 2017;154:576–584.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lawrence SA, Attiyeh MA, Seier K, et al. Should patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas undergo long-term radiographic surveillance? Ann Surg. 2017;266:536–544.CrossRefPubMed Lawrence SA, Attiyeh MA, Seier K, et al. Should patients with cystic lesions of the pancreas undergo long-term radiographic surveillance? Ann Surg. 2017;266:536–544.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Imbe K, Nagata N, Hisada Y, et al. Validation of the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines on management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: more than 5 years of follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:170–178.CrossRefPubMed Imbe K, Nagata N, Hisada Y, et al. Validation of the American Gastroenterological Association guidelines on management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: more than 5 years of follow-up. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:170–178.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Alkaade S, Chahla E, Levy M. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cyst fluid. Endosc. Ultrasound. 2015;4:299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Alkaade S, Chahla E, Levy M. Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology, viscosity, and carcinoembryonic antigen in pancreatic cyst fluid. Endosc. Ultrasound. 2015;4:299.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330–1336.CrossRefPubMed Brugge WR, Lewandrowski K, Lee-Lewandrowski E, et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:1330–1336.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Samarasena J, Chen C, Chin M, Chang K, Lee J. Successful closure of a cryotherapy-induced bleeding jejunal perforation with the over-the-scope clip system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:451.CrossRefPubMed Samarasena J, Chen C, Chin M, Chang K, Lee J. Successful closure of a cryotherapy-induced bleeding jejunal perforation with the over-the-scope clip system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:451.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Coman RM, Schlachterman A, Esnakula AK, Draganov PV, Yang D. EUS-guided, through-the-needle forceps: clenching down the diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:372–373.CrossRefPubMed Coman RM, Schlachterman A, Esnakula AK, Draganov PV, Yang D. EUS-guided, through-the-needle forceps: clenching down the diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:372–373.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Attili F, Pagliari D, Rimbaș M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided histological diagnosis of a mucinous non-neoplastic pancreatic cyst using a specially designed through-the-needle microforceps. Endoscopy. 2016;48:E188–E189.CrossRefPubMed Attili F, Pagliari D, Rimbaș M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided histological diagnosis of a mucinous non-neoplastic pancreatic cyst using a specially designed through-the-needle microforceps. Endoscopy. 2016;48:E188–E189.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Huelsen A, Cooper C, Saad N, Gupta S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, through-the-needle forceps biopsy in the assessment of an incidental large pancreatic cystic lesion with prior inconclusive fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2017;49:E109–E110.CrossRefPubMed Huelsen A, Cooper C, Saad N, Gupta S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided, through-the-needle forceps biopsy in the assessment of an incidental large pancreatic cystic lesion with prior inconclusive fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2017;49:E109–E110.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mittal C, Obuch JC, Hammad H, et al. Technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety of microforceps biopsies during EUS evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1263–1269.CrossRefPubMed Mittal C, Obuch JC, Hammad H, et al. Technical feasibility, diagnostic yield, and safety of microforceps biopsies during EUS evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87:1263–1269.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Survey Study on the Practice Patterns of the Evaluation and Management of Incidental Pancreatic Cysts
Authors
Donevan Westerveld
April Goddard
Nieka Harris
Vikas Khullar
Justin Forde
Peter V. Draganov
Chris E. Forsmark
Dennis Yang
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5368-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2019 Go to the issue