Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2018

01-12-2018 | Editorial

Overlap Between Gastric and Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Contractual Arrangement?

Authors: Mohammad Bashashati, Reza A. Hejazi

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 12/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Disorders of gut–brain interaction [DGBI, also termed functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (FGIDs)] and motility disorders are two common GI conditions in which there is no endoscopic evidence of mucosal disease [1]. Whereas the diagnosis of DGBI is currently based on the Rome IV criteria [1], motility disorders are diagnosed with physiological tests including manometry and scintigraphy. The Chicago classification, which is based on high-resolution manometry (HRM), is applied to diagnose esophageal motility disorders that based on new definitions include achalasia, distal esophageal spasm (DES), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO), ‘jackhammer’ esophagus, absent peristalsis, ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and fragmented peristalsis [2]. In the stomach, motility disorders are categorized based on a standardized radiographic measure, 4-h gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). More than 60 and 10% retention of the solid egg-based radiolabeled meal at 2 and 4 h, respectively, is considered evidence of gastroparesis (GP), whereas < 35% retention at 1 h and < 20% at 2 h suggest rapid emptying or dumping syndrome [3]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV-functional GI disorders: disorders of gut–brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1257–1261.CrossRef Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV-functional GI disorders: disorders of gut–brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1257–1261.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–174.CrossRef Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. The Chicago classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:160–174.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:753–763.CrossRef Abell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:753–763.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Schmulson M. How to use Rome IV criteria in the evaluation of esophageal disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018;34:258–265.CrossRef Schmulson M. How to use Rome IV criteria in the evaluation of esophageal disorders. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2018;34:258–265.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tack J, Carbone F. Functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33:446–454.CrossRef Tack J, Carbone F. Functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2017;33:446–454.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aziz I, Palsson OS, Tornblom H, et al. The prevalence and impact of overlapping Rome IV-diagnosed functional gastrointestinal disorders on somatization, quality of life, and healthcare utilization: a cross-sectional general population study in three countries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:86–96.CrossRef Aziz I, Palsson OS, Tornblom H, et al. The prevalence and impact of overlapping Rome IV-diagnosed functional gastrointestinal disorders on somatization, quality of life, and healthcare utilization: a cross-sectional general population study in three countries. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018;113:86–96.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parkman HP, Yates K, Hasler WL, et al. Clinical features of idiopathic gastroparesis vary with sex, body mass, symptom onset, delay in gastric emptying, and gastroparesis severity. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:101–115.CrossRef Parkman HP, Yates K, Hasler WL, et al. Clinical features of idiopathic gastroparesis vary with sex, body mass, symptom onset, delay in gastric emptying, and gastroparesis severity. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:101–115.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Triadafilopoulos G, Nguyen L, Clarke JO. Patients with symptoms of delayed gastric emptying have a high prevalence of oesophageal dysmotility, irrespective of scintigraphic evidence of gastroparesis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017;4:e000169.CrossRef Triadafilopoulos G, Nguyen L, Clarke JO. Patients with symptoms of delayed gastric emptying have a high prevalence of oesophageal dysmotility, irrespective of scintigraphic evidence of gastroparesis. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2017;4:e000169.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tavakkoli A, Sayed BA, Talley NJ, et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy: Is gastroparesis a factor? World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6193–6198.CrossRef Tavakkoli A, Sayed BA, Talley NJ, et al. Acid and non-acid reflux in patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy: Is gastroparesis a factor? World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6193–6198.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gourcerol G, Benanni Y, Boueyre E, et al. Influence of gastric emptying on gastro-esophageal reflux: a combined pH-impedance study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:800e634. Gourcerol G, Benanni Y, Boueyre E, et al. Influence of gastric emptying on gastro-esophageal reflux: a combined pH-impedance study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013;25:800e634.
Metadata
Title
Overlap Between Gastric and Esophageal Motility Disorders: A Contractual Arrangement?
Authors
Mohammad Bashashati
Reza A. Hejazi
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 12/2018
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5258-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2018

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2018 Go to the issue