Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2017

01-06-2017 | Original Article

Body Mass Index and Clinical Outcomes from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasia

Authors: Donghoon Kang, Sung Eun Ha, Jae Myung Park, Seung Bae Yoon, Han Hee Lee, Chul-Hyun Lim, Jin Su Kim, Yu Kyung Cho, Myung-Gyu Choi

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aim

Association between obesity and endoscopic resection outcomes has not been investigated. We sought to determine the clinical impact of obesity in patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasia.

Methods

A total of 1571 consecutive patients with gastric neoplasia who underwent ESD between December 2010 and March 2016 were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively analyzed 1181 cases that were divided into three groups based upon body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) according to the criteria for Asia-Pacific populations: normal (<23, n = 411), overweight (≥23 and <25, n = 312), and obese (≥25, n = 458). Demographics, endoscopic findings, pathologic results, and clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results

No significant differences were observed between the three BMI groups in the following measures: the en-bloc resection rate, the complete resection rate, lymphovascular involvement or submucosal invasion of tumor cells, and adverse events. However, when comparing the obese and overweight groups with the normal group, mean procedure time was longer (P = 0.001) and the percentage of cases requiring more than 30 min, which was the overall mean procedure time, was greater (60.7, 53.2, and 50.1%, respectively; P = 0.006). The significantly associated factors with procedure durations longer than 30 min were obesity, longitudinal and circumferential location, large resection size (≥4 cm), cancer pathology, and submucosal layer invasion. In multivariate analyses, obesity was an independent predictor of long procedure time for gastric ESD.

Conclusion

Being obese or overweight did not directly affect clinical outcomes in gastric ESD. However, obesity was significantly associated with long procedure time. Our results suggest that gastric ESD can be performed safely and effectively in obese patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bickenbach KA, Denton B, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Impact of obesity on perioperative complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:780–787. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2653-3.CrossRefPubMed Bickenbach KA, Denton B, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Impact of obesity on perioperative complications and long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:780–787. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-012-2653-3.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Hashimoto H, Ayanian JZ. Body mass index and outcomes following gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Japan. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1335–1343. doi:10.1002/bjs.9221.CrossRefPubMed Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Matsuda S, Fushimi K, Hashimoto H, Ayanian JZ. Body mass index and outcomes following gastrointestinal cancer surgery in Japan. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1335–1343. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​9221.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yamada H, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K. Effect of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy—comparison with open distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:997–1004. doi:10.1007/s11605-007-0374-x.CrossRefPubMed Yamada H, Kojima K, Inokuchi M, Kawano T, Sugihara K. Effect of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy—comparison with open distal gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:997–1004. doi:10.​1007/​s11605-007-0374-x.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews B, Kercher K, Sing R, Heniford B. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2003;17:1228–1230.CrossRef Harold KL, Pollinger H, Matthews B, Kercher K, Sing R, Heniford B. Comparison of ultrasonic energy, bipolar thermal energy, and vascular clips for the hemostasis of small-, medium-, and large-sized arteries. Surg Endosc Interv Tech. 2003;17:1228–1230.CrossRef
13.
16.
go back to reference WHO. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia; 2000. WHO. The Asia-Pacific Perspective: Redefining Obesity and Its Treatment. Sydney: Health Communications Australia; 2000.
18.
go back to reference Gotoda T, Iwasaki M, Kusano C, Seewald S, Oda I. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria. Br J Surg. 2010;97:868–871. doi:10.1002/bjs.7033.CrossRefPubMed Gotoda T, Iwasaki M, Kusano C, Seewald S, Oda I. Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer treated by guideline and expanded National Cancer Centre criteria. Br J Surg. 2010;97:868–871. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​7033.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, et al. Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:911–916. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2010.11.046.CrossRefPubMed Ahn JY, Choi KD, Choi JY, et al. Procedure time of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the size and location of early gastric cancers: analysis of 916 dissections performed by 4 experts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:911–916. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gie.​2010.​11.​046.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Body Mass Index and Clinical Outcomes from Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Gastric Neoplasia
Authors
Donghoon Kang
Sung Eun Ha
Jae Myung Park
Seung Bae Yoon
Han Hee Lee
Chul-Hyun Lim
Jin Su Kim
Yu Kyung Cho
Myung-Gyu Choi
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4560-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2017 Go to the issue