Published in:
01-12-2013 | Original Article
Safety Analysis of a Hemostatic Powder in a Porcine Model of Acute Severe Gastric Bleeding
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 12/2013
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding is a common condition that requires prompt lifesaving therapy and traditional endoscopic treatments require high technical proficiency to perform.
Aims
This study was conducted to identify any local or systemic histopathologic effects of a hemostatic powder in a porcine model of active, severe, non-variceal UGI hemorrhage.
Methods
This prospective, non-blinded animal study was performed in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice and Animal Care and Use Guidelines. Six animals underwent gastrotomy and creation of a looped vascular bundle, which was placed into the stomach lumen. The transplanted vascular bundle was punctured with an endoscopic needle–knife to create Forrest grade Ia or Ib bleeding. The hemostatic powder was then applied until hemostasis was achieved.
Results
Initial hemostasis was achieved in all animals. Results of pre- and post-treatment coagulation studies were similar. All animals survived at least 9 days post-procedure. The hemostatic powder was not found in any local, regional, or systemic tissues. Gross and histologic analysis of systemic organs showed no infarct, particulate, or embolic effects. No gross or microscopic necropsy findings were treatment-related.
Conclusions
The hemostatic powder achieved initial hemostasis (even in animals with spurting arterial bleeding) with no bowel obstruction or unintended luminal effects, no local or regional particulate effects, no systemic embolic effects, and no systemic coagulopathic effects.