Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Article

Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Balloon Assisted-Colonoscopy for Colon Examination After Previous Incomplete Standard Colonoscopy

Authors: Ivana Dzeletovic, M. Edwyn Harrison, Shabana F. Pasha, Michael D. Crowell, G. Anton Decker, Suryakanth R. Gurudu, Jonathan A. Leighton

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Colonoscopy fails to achieve cecal intubation in 5–10 % of cases. Many of these cases can be completed using balloon-assisted colonoscopy, either with the single-balloon colonoscopy (SBC) or the double-balloon colonoscopy (DBC) techniques.

Aim

To compare the completion rates of SBC and DBC in patients with previous incomplete conventional colonoscopy.

Methods

Between August 2009 and July 2011 either SBC or DBC was performed in 53 patients in whom previous conventional colonoscopy did not achieve cecal intubation. The medical records of these 53 patients were reviewed retrospectively for details regarding (1) indication for the initial colonoscopy, (2) patient characteristics, (3) data from the initial colonoscopy, and (4) details on both SBC and DBC.

Results

SBC was successful in intubating the cecum in 100 % (26/26) of patients and DBC was successful in 93 % (25/27) of patients. The median (range) time to reach the cecum was 17 (9–43) min in the SBC group and 20 (7–58) min in the DBC group (P = 0.37). The presence of polyps was an entirely new finding in 35 % (9/26) of patients in the SBC group and 30 % (8/27) of patients in DBC group. Therapeutics were performed in 73 % (19/26) of patients in SBC group and 67 % (18/27) of patients in DBC group.

Conclusion

For patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy, SBC and DBC offer high cecal intubation rates as well as detection of additional polyps and therapeutic capability. Either SBC or DBC can be considered after incomplete conventional colonoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:546–557.PubMedCrossRef Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:546–557.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873–885.PubMed Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:873–885.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:518–520.PubMedCrossRef Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:518–520.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, Greenwald BD, Raufman JP. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:721–731.PubMedCrossRef Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A, Greenwald BD, Raufman JP. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:721–731.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:556–560.PubMed Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:556–560.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:558–562.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Messina CR, Cohn W, et al. Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:558–562.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2297–2303.PubMedCrossRef Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology. 2007;132:2297–2303.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB. The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion. 2009;80:267–270.PubMedCrossRef Loffeld RJ, van der Putten AB. The completion rate of colonoscopy in normal daily practice: factors associated with failure. Digestion. 2009;80:267–270.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2784–2787.PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:2784–2787.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1295–1300.PubMedCrossRef Takahashi Y, Tanaka H, Kinjo M, Sakumoto K. Prospective evaluation of factors predicting difficulty and pain during sedation-free colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1295–1300.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marshall JB, Perez RA, Madsen RW. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:838–841.PubMedCrossRef Marshall JB, Perez RA, Madsen RW. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:838–841.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Ct colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403–1412.PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. Ct colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1403–1412.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American college of radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.PubMedCrossRef Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American cancer society, the us multi-society task force on colorectal cancer, and the American college of radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–1595.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Paonessa NJ, Rosen L, Stasik JJ. Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:851–854.PubMedCrossRef Paonessa NJ, Rosen L, Stasik JJ. Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:851–854.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rex DK. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy. 2001;33:60–64.PubMedCrossRef Rex DK. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy. 2001;33:60–64.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Rex DK, Goodwine BW. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1148–1151.PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Goodwine BW. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1148–1151.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:879–883.PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Chen SC, Overhiser AJ. Colonoscopy technique in consecutive patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:879–883.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:80–83.PubMedCrossRef Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:80–83.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy. 2007;39:788–792.PubMedCrossRef Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy. 2007;39:788–792.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:848–853.PubMedCrossRef Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:848–853.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:921–925.PubMedCrossRef Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis. 2006;38:921–925.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38:395–398.PubMedCrossRef May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006;38:395–398.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Teshima CW, Aktas H, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, Mensink PB. Single-balloon-assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1319–1323.PubMedCrossRef Teshima CW, Aktas H, Haringsma J, Kuipers EJ, Mensink PB. Single-balloon-assisted colonoscopy in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1319–1323.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Monkemuller K, Knippig C, Rickes S, Fry LC, Schulze A, Malfertheiner P. Usefulness of the double-balloon enteroscope in colonoscopies performed in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:277–278.PubMedCrossRef Monkemuller K, Knippig C, Rickes S, Fry LC, Schulze A, Malfertheiner P. Usefulness of the double-balloon enteroscope in colonoscopies performed in patients with previously failed colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:277–278.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Keswani RN. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:507–512.PubMedCrossRef Keswani RN. Single-balloon colonoscopy versus repeat standard colonoscopy for previous incomplete colonoscopy: a randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:507–512.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Coppola F, Gaia S, Cosimato M, Recchia S. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:475–477.PubMedCrossRef Coppola F, Gaia S, Cosimato M, Recchia S. Enteroscope without overtube for cecal intubation after an incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:475–477.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. Colonoscopy using a double-balloon endoscope for technical difficult cases. Endoscopy. 2005;37:A53. Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K, et al. Colonoscopy using a double-balloon endoscope for technical difficult cases. Endoscopy. 2005;37:A53.
28.
go back to reference Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A, et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences. Endoscopy. 2008;40:11–15.PubMedCrossRef Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A, et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences. Endoscopy. 2008;40:11–15.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:1004–1017.
30.
go back to reference Delvaux M, Gay G. Novel applications of balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2009;19:509–518.CrossRef Delvaux M, Gay G. Novel applications of balloon endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am. 2009;19:509–518.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Tanaka K, et al. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1112–1116.PubMedCrossRef Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Tanaka K, et al. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1112–1116.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Single- Versus Double-Balloon Assisted-Colonoscopy for Colon Examination After Previous Incomplete Standard Colonoscopy
Authors
Ivana Dzeletovic
M. Edwyn Harrison
Shabana F. Pasha
Michael D. Crowell
G. Anton Decker
Suryakanth R. Gurudu
Jonathan A. Leighton
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2012
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2227-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2012

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2012 Go to the issue