Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2010

01-05-2010 | Review

Can Endoscopic Ultrasound Predict Early Rectal Cancers That Can Be Resected Endoscopically? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Authors: Srinivas R. Puli, Matthew L. Bechtold, Jyotsna B. K. Reddy, Abhishek Choudhary, Mainor R. Antillon

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Rectal cancers that are confined to the mucosa (T0) can be resected endoscopically. This can help the patient avoid transabdominal surgery. The published data on accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to predict T0 stage of rectal cancers has been varied.

Aim

To evaluate the accuracy of EUS in T0 staging of rectal cancers.

Method (Study Selection Criteria)

Only EUS studies confirmed by surgery were selected. T0 was defined as tumor confined to the mucosa.

Data Collection and Extraction

Articles were searched in Medline, PubMed, and CENTRAL.

Statistical Method

Pooling was conducted by both the fixed-effects model and random-effects model.

Results

An initial search identified 3,360 reference articles. Of these, 339 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Eleven studies (N = 1,791) which met the inclusion criteria were included in this analysis. Pooled sensitivity of EUS in diagnosing T0 was 97.3% (95% CI: 93.7–99.1). EUS had a pooled specificity of 96.3% (95% CI: 95.3–97.2). The positive likelihood ratio of EUS was 21.9 (95% CI: 16.3–29.7) and negative likelihood ratio was 0.08 (95% CI: 0.04–0.15). All the pooled estimates, calculated by fixed and random effect models, were similar. The P-value for Chi-squared heterogeneity for all the pooled accuracy estimates was >0.10.

Conclusions

EUS has excellent sensitivity and specificity, this helps accurately diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers. Over the past two decades, the sensitivity and specificity of EUS to diagnose T0 stage of rectal cancers has remained high. This can help physicians offer endoscopic treatment to these patients, therefore EUS should be strongly considered for staging of early rectal cancers.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(10):658–662.PubMedCrossRef Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992;326(10):658–662.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(22):1679–1687.PubMed Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A. Diabetes mellitus and risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(22):1679–1687.PubMed
5.
go back to reference Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(5):327–334.PubMed Giovannucci E, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC. Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122(5):327–334.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Cho E, Smith-Warner SA, Ritz J, et al. Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 cohort studies. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(8):603–613.PubMed Cho E, Smith-Warner SA, Ritz J, et al. Alcohol intake and colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 8 cohort studies. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140(8):603–613.PubMed
7.
8.
go back to reference Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York: Springer; 2002.
12.
go back to reference Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML, Diaz-Arias AA, Ibdah JA, Marshall JB. En Bloc submucosal Dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):332–337. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2007.08.038.CrossRefPubMed Antillon MR, Bartalos CR, Miller ML, Diaz-Arias AA, Ibdah JA, Marshall JB. En Bloc submucosal Dissection of a 14-cm laterally spreading adenoma of the rectum with involvement to the anal canal: expanding the frontiers of endoscopic surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(2):332–337. doi:10.​1016/​j.​gie.​2007.​08.​038.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bailey HR, Huval WV, Max E, Smith KW, Butts DR, Zamora LF. Local excision of carcinoma of the rectum for cure. Surgery. 1992;111(5):555–561.PubMed Bailey HR, Huval WV, Max E, Smith KW, Butts DR, Zamora LF. Local excision of carcinoma of the rectum for cure. Surgery. 1992;111(5):555–561.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kodner IJ, Gilley MT, Shemesh EI, Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Myerson RJ. Radiation therapy as definitive treatment for selected invasive rectal cancer. Surgery. 1993;114(4):850–856.PubMed Kodner IJ, Gilley MT, Shemesh EI, Fleshman JW, Fry RD, Myerson RJ. Radiation therapy as definitive treatment for selected invasive rectal cancer. Surgery. 1993;114(4):850–856.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mendenhall WM, Rout WR, Vauthey JN, Haigh LS, Zlotecki RA, Copeland EM III. Conservative treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with endocavitary irradiation or wide local excision and postoperative irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(10):3241–3248.PubMed Mendenhall WM, Rout WR, Vauthey JN, Haigh LS, Zlotecki RA, Copeland EM III. Conservative treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma with endocavitary irradiation or wide local excision and postoperative irradiation. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(10):3241–3248.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Matsuda T, Saito Y, Uraoka T, et al. Therapeutic strategy for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the colorectum. Syokaki naisikyo. 2006;18:1151–1157. Matsuda T, Saito Y, Uraoka T, et al. Therapeutic strategy for laterally spreading tumors (LSTs) in the colorectum. Syokaki naisikyo. 2006;18:1151–1157.
19.
go back to reference Nakajima K, Shin-ichi M, Aoki T, et al. Result of endoscopic resection and treatment strategy including operation for colorectal adenoma and early cancer of 20 mm or more in diameter. Prog Dig Endosc. 2006;68:67–72. Nakajima K, Shin-ichi M, Aoki T, et al. Result of endoscopic resection and treatment strategy including operation for colorectal adenoma and early cancer of 20 mm or more in diameter. Prog Dig Endosc. 2006;68:67–72.
24.
go back to reference Sleisenger and Fortran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Saunders, 2006. Sleisenger and Fortran’s Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 8th ed. Saunders, 2006.
25.
go back to reference Guinet C, Buy JN, Ghossain MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):385–388.PubMed Guinet C, Buy JN, Ghossain MA, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1990;125(3):385–388.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology. 1989;170(2):319–322.PubMed Rifkin MD, Ehrlich SM, Marks G. Staging of rectal carcinoma: prospective comparison of endorectal US and CT. Radiology. 1989;170(2):319–322.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Koch B, Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(10):863–868. doi:10.1007/BF02051923.CrossRefPubMed Hildebrandt U, Klein T, Feifel G, Schwarz HP, Koch B, Schmitt RM. Endosonography of pararectal lymph nodes. In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33(10):863–868. doi:10.​1007/​BF02051923.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Tio TL, Coene PP, van Delden OM, Tytgat GN. Colorectal carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology. 1991;179(1):165–170.PubMed Tio TL, Coene PP, van Delden OM, Tytgat GN. Colorectal carcinoma: preoperative TNM classification with endosonography. Radiology. 1991;179(1):165–170.PubMed
30.
go back to reference Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1189–1193. doi:10.1007/BF02257780.CrossRefPubMed Thaler W, Watzka S, Martin F, et al. Preoperative staging of rectal cancer by endoluminal ultrasound vs. magnetic resonance imaging. Preliminary results of a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1994;37(12):1189–1193. doi:10.​1007/​BF02257780.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1995;27(7):469–479. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1005751.CrossRefPubMed Meyenberger C, Huch Boni RA, Bertschinger P, Zala GF, Klotz HP, Krestin GP. Endoscopic ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective, comparative study for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1995;27(7):469–479. doi:10.​1055/​s-2007-1005751.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Croat Med J. 2003;44(5):635–638.PubMed Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. The standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy group. Croat Med J. 2003;44(5):635–638.PubMed
37.
go back to reference Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008.CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–2012. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​283.​15.​2008.CrossRefPubMed
38.
39.
go back to reference Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Antillon M, Ibdah JA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(25):4011–4019. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.4011.CrossRefPubMed Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Antillon M, Ibdah JA. How good is endoscopic ultrasound for TNM staging of gastric cancers? A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(25):4011–4019. doi:10.​3748/​wjg.​14.​4011.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Ibdah JA, Antillon M. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(10):1479–1490. doi:10.3748/wjg.14.1479.CrossRefPubMed Puli SR, Reddy JBK, Bechtold ML, Ibdah JA, Antillon M. Staging accuracy of esophageal cancer by endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(10):1479–1490. doi:10.​3748/​wjg.​14.​1479.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen; 1970. Cox DR. The analysis of binary data. London: Methuen; 1970.
43.
go back to reference Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984. Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data. New York: Wiley; 1984.
44.
go back to reference Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001. Deeks JJ. Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, eds. Systematic reviews in health care. Meta-analysis in context. London: BMJ Books; 2001.
45.
go back to reference Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JAC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–3457. doi:10.1002/sim.2380.CrossRef Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JAC. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med. 2005;25(20):3443–3457. doi:10.​1002/​sim.​2380.CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Norton SA, Thomas MG. Staging of rectosigmoid neoplasia with colonoscopic endoluminal ultrasonography. Brit J Surg. 1999;86(7):942–946(5).CrossRef Norton SA, Thomas MG. Staging of rectosigmoid neoplasia with colonoscopic endoluminal ultrasonography. Brit J Surg. 1999;86(7):942–946(5).CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Kaneko K, Boku N, Hosokawa K, et al. Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative rectal cancer staging estimation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996;26(1):30–35.PubMed Kaneko K, Boku N, Hosokawa K, et al. Diagnostic utility of endoscopic ultrasonography for preoperative rectal cancer staging estimation. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1996;26(1):30–35.PubMed
55.
go back to reference Nishimori H, Sasaki K, Hirata K, et al. The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Int Surg. 1998;83(2):157–160.PubMed Nishimori H, Sasaki K, Hirata K, et al. The value of endoscopic ultrasonography in preoperative evaluation of rectal cancer. Int Surg. 1998;83(2):157–160.PubMed
56.
go back to reference Hsieh PS, Changchien CR, Chen JS, et al. Comparing results of preoperative staging of rectal tumor using endorectal ultrasonography and histopathology. Chang Gung Med J. 2003;26(7):474–478.PubMed Hsieh PS, Changchien CR, Chen JS, et al. Comparing results of preoperative staging of rectal tumor using endorectal ultrasonography and histopathology. Chang Gung Med J. 2003;26(7):474–478.PubMed
57.
58.
go back to reference Waizer A, Powsner E, Russo I, et al. Prospective comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(12):1068–1072. doi:10.1007/BF02050063.CrossRefPubMed Waizer A, Powsner E, Russo I, et al. Prospective comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound for preoperative staging and follow-up of rectal cancer. Preliminary report. Dis Colon Rectum. 1991;34(12):1068–1072. doi:10.​1007/​BF02050063.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Can Endoscopic Ultrasound Predict Early Rectal Cancers That Can Be Resected Endoscopically? A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Authors
Srinivas R. Puli
Matthew L. Bechtold
Jyotsna B. K. Reddy
Abhishek Choudhary
Mainor R. Antillon
Publication date
01-05-2010
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-009-0862-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2010 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.