Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 5/2017

01-06-2017 | Research Paper

Portal branch ligation does not counteract the inhibiting effect of temsirolimus on extrahepatic colorectal metastatic growth

Authors: Sebastian Senger, Jens Sperling, Barbara Oberkircher, Martin K. Schilling, Otto Kollmar, Michael D. Menger, Christian Ziemann

Published in: Clinical & Experimental Metastasis | Issue 5/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

The mTor-inhibitor temsirolimus (TEM) has potent anti-tumor activities on extrahepatic colorectal metastases. Treatment of patients with advanced disease may require portal branch ligation (PBL). While PBL can induce intrahepatic tumor growth, the effect of PBL on extrahepatic metastases under TEM treatment is unknown. Therefore, we analyzed the effects of TEM treatment on extrahepatic metastases during PBL-associated liver regeneration. GFP-transfected CT26.WT colorectal cancer cells were implanted into the dorsal skinfold chamber of BALB/c-mice. Mice were randomized to four groups (n = 8). One was treated daily with TEM (1.5 mg/kg), PBS-treated animals served as controls. Another group underwent PBL of the left liver lobe and received daily TEM treatment. Animals with PBL and PBS treatment served as controls. Tumor vascularization and growth as well as tumor cell migration, proliferation and apoptosis were studied over 14 days. In non-PBL animals TEM treatment inhibited tumor cell proliferation as well as vascularization and growth of the extrahepatic metastases. PBL did not influence tumor cell engraftment, vascularization and metastatic growth. Of interest, TEM treatment significantly reduced tumor cell engraftment, neovascularization and metastatic groth also after PBL. PBL does not counteract the inhibiting effect of TEM on extrahepatic colorectal metastatic growth.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K et. al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527PubMed Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K et. al (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527PubMed
4.
go back to reference Aussilhou B, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A et al (2008) Right portal vein ligation is as effective as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 12:297–303CrossRefPubMed Aussilhou B, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A et al (2008) Right portal vein ligation is as effective as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 12:297–303CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Capussotti L, Muratore A, Baracchi F et al (2008) Portal vein ligation as an efficient method of increasing the future liver remnant volume in the surgical treatment of colorectal metastasis. Arch Surg 143:978–982CrossRefPubMed Capussotti L, Muratore A, Baracchi F et al (2008) Portal vein ligation as an efficient method of increasing the future liver remnant volume in the surgical treatment of colorectal metastasis. Arch Surg 143:978–982CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Broering DC, Hillert C, Krupski G et al (2002) Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 6:905–913CrossRefPubMed Broering DC, Hillert C, Krupski G et al (2002) Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg 6:905–913CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sakai N, Clarke CN, Schuster R et al (2010) Portal vein ligation accelerates tumor growth in ligated, but not contralateral lobes. World J Gastroenterol 16:3816–3826CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sakai N, Clarke CN, Schuster R et al (2010) Portal vein ligation accelerates tumor growth in ligated, but not contralateral lobes. World J Gastroenterol 16:3816–3826CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Corsten M, Scheuer C et al (2010) Tumour growth following portal branch ligation in an experimental model of liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:917–926CrossRefPubMed Kollmar O, Corsten M, Scheuer C et al (2010) Tumour growth following portal branch ligation in an experimental model of liver metastases. Br J Surg 97:917–926CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gridelli C, Maione P, Rossi A (2008) The potential role of mTOR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 13:139–147CrossRefPubMed Gridelli C, Maione P, Rossi A (2008) The potential role of mTOR inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 13:139–147CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Guba M, von Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, et. Al (2002) Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med 8:128–135CrossRefPubMed Guba M, von Breitenbuch P, Steinbauer M, et. Al (2002) Rapamycin inhibits primary and metastatic tumor growth by antiangiogenesis: involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med 8:128–135CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rupertus K, Dahlem C, Menger MD et al (2009) Rapamycin inhibits hepatectomy-induced stimulation of metastatic tumor growth by reduction of angiogenesis, microvascular blood perfusion and tumor cell proliferation. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2629–2637CrossRefPubMed Rupertus K, Dahlem C, Menger MD et al (2009) Rapamycin inhibits hepatectomy-induced stimulation of metastatic tumor growth by reduction of angiogenesis, microvascular blood perfusion and tumor cell proliferation. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2629–2637CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Rupertus K, Scheuer C et al (2010) CXCR4 and CXCR7 regulate angiogenesis and CT26.WT tumor growth independent from SDF-1. Int J Cancer 126:1302–1315PubMed Kollmar O, Rupertus K, Scheuer C et al (2010) CXCR4 and CXCR7 regulate angiogenesis and CT26.WT tumor growth independent from SDF-1. Int J Cancer 126:1302–1315PubMed
13.
go back to reference Menger MD, Laschke MW, Vollmar B (2002) Viewing the microcirculation through the window: some twenty years experience with the hamster dorsal skinfold chamber. Eur Surg Res 34:83–91CrossRefPubMed Menger MD, Laschke MW, Vollmar B (2002) Viewing the microcirculation through the window: some twenty years experience with the hamster dorsal skinfold chamber. Eur Surg Res 34:83–91CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kollmar O, Corsten M, Scheuer C et al (2007) Portal branch ligation induces a hepatic arterial buffer response, microvascular remodeling, normoxygenation, and cell proliferation in portal blood-deprived liver tissue. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:1534–1542CrossRef Kollmar O, Corsten M, Scheuer C et al (2007) Portal branch ligation induces a hepatic arterial buffer response, microvascular remodeling, normoxygenation, and cell proliferation in portal blood-deprived liver tissue. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:1534–1542CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Liu HS, Jan MS, Chou CK, Chen PH, Ke NJ (1999) Is green fluorescent protein toxic to the living cells? Biochem Biophys Res Commun 14(260):712–717CrossRef Liu HS, Jan MS, Chou CK, Chen PH, Ke NJ (1999) Is green fluorescent protein toxic to the living cells? Biochem Biophys Res Commun 14(260):712–717CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ansari AM, Ahmed AK, Matsangos AE, Lay F, Born LJ, Marti G, Harmon JW, Sun Z (2016) Cellular GFP toxicity and immunogenicity: potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Rev 12:553–559CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ansari AM, Ahmed AK, Matsangos AE, Lay F, Born LJ, Marti G, Harmon JW, Sun Z (2016) Cellular GFP toxicity and immunogenicity: potential confounders in in vivo cell tracking experiments. Stem Cell Rev 12:553–559CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Skelton D, Satake N, Kohn DB (2001) The enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) is minimally immunogenic in C57BL/6 mice. Gene Ther 8:1813–1814CrossRefPubMed Skelton D, Satake N, Kohn DB (2001) The enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) is minimally immunogenic in C57BL/6 mice. Gene Ther 8:1813–1814CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Gu Y, Scheuer C, Feng D, Menger MD, Laschke MW (2013) Inhibition of angiogenesis: a novel antitumor mechanism of the herbal compound arctigenin. Anticancer Drugs 24:781–791CrossRefPubMed Gu Y, Scheuer C, Feng D, Menger MD, Laschke MW (2013) Inhibition of angiogenesis: a novel antitumor mechanism of the herbal compound arctigenin. Anticancer Drugs 24:781–791CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK et al (2008) Evaluation of long- term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg 247:125–135CrossRefPubMed Rees M, Tekkis PP, Welsh FK et al (2008) Evaluation of long- term survival after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multifactorial model of 929 patients. Ann Surg 247:125–135CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Guba M, Koehl GE, Neppl E et al (2005) Dosing of rapamycin is critical to achieve an optimal antiangiogenic effect against cancer. Transpl Int 18:89–94CrossRefPubMed Guba M, Koehl GE, Neppl E et al (2005) Dosing of rapamycin is critical to achieve an optimal antiangiogenic effect against cancer. Transpl Int 18:89–94CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sperling J, Schäfer T, Benz-Weißer A et al (2013) Hepatic arterial infusion but not systemic application of cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin significantly reduces growth of CC531 colorectal rat liver metastases. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:555–562CrossRefPubMed Sperling J, Schäfer T, Benz-Weißer A et al (2013) Hepatic arterial infusion but not systemic application of cetuximab in combination with oxaliplatin significantly reduces growth of CC531 colorectal rat liver metastases. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:555–562CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sperling J, Ziemann C, Schuld J et al (2012) A comparative evaluation of ablations produced by high-frequency coagulation-, argon plasma coagulation-, and cryotherapy devices in porcine liver. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1229–1235CrossRefPubMed Sperling J, Ziemann C, Schuld J et al (2012) A comparative evaluation of ablations produced by high-frequency coagulation-, argon plasma coagulation-, and cryotherapy devices in porcine liver. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1229–1235CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hurwitz HI, Tebbutt NC, Kabbinavar F et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials. Oncologist 18:1004–1012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hurwitz HI, Tebbutt NC, Kabbinavar F et al (2013) Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis from seven randomized controlled trials. Oncologist 18:1004–1012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Lin KJ, Liao CH, Hsiao IT et al (2009) Improved hepatocyte function of future liver remnant of cirrhotic rats after portal vein ligation: a bonus other than volume shifting. Surgery 145:202–211CrossRefPubMed Lin KJ, Liao CH, Hsiao IT et al (2009) Improved hepatocyte function of future liver remnant of cirrhotic rats after portal vein ligation: a bonus other than volume shifting. Surgery 145:202–211CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Sibert A et al (2011) Selective portal vein ligation and embolization induce different tumoral responses in the rat liver. Surgery 149:496–503CrossRefPubMed Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Sibert A et al (2011) Selective portal vein ligation and embolization induce different tumoral responses in the rat liver. Surgery 149:496–503CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Rozga J, Tanaka N, Jeppsson B et al (1985) Tumor growth in liver atrophy and growth. An experimental study in rats. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21:135–140CrossRefPubMed Rozga J, Tanaka N, Jeppsson B et al (1985) Tumor growth in liver atrophy and growth. An experimental study in rats. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 21:135–140CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamaguchi H et al (2017) Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Surg Today 47:280–283CrossRefPubMed Emoto S, Ishigami H, Yamaguchi H et al (2017) Port-site metastasis after laparoscopic surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Surg Today 47:280–283CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344(8914):58CrossRefPubMed Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF (1994) Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet 344(8914):58CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Delgado S, García-Valdecasas JC et al (1998) Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1039–1042CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Delgado S, García-Valdecasas JC et al (1998) Port site metastases and recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy. A randomized trial. Surg Endosc 12:1039–1042CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185CrossRefPubMed Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) et al (2004) Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163–1185CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Zmora O, Gervaz P, Wexner SD (2001) Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 15:788–793CrossRefPubMed Zmora O, Gervaz P, Wexner SD (2001) Trocar site recurrence in laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 15:788–793CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group et al (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–662CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Faivre S, Kroemer G, Raymond E (2006) Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:671–688CrossRefPubMed Faivre S, Kroemer G, Raymond E (2006) Current development of mTOR inhibitors as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5:671–688CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Schedel F, Pries R, Thode B et al (2011) mTOR inhibitors show promising in vitro activity in bladder cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 25:763–768PubMed Schedel F, Pries R, Thode B et al (2011) mTOR inhibitors show promising in vitro activity in bladder cancer and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep 25:763–768PubMed
39.
go back to reference Frost P, Berlanger E, Hoang B et al (2013) Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors induce tumor cell apoptosis in vivo primarily by inhibiting VEGF expression and angiogenesis. J Oncol 2013:897025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frost P, Berlanger E, Hoang B et al (2013) Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors induce tumor cell apoptosis in vivo primarily by inhibiting VEGF expression and angiogenesis. J Oncol 2013:897025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Yuge R, Kitadai Y, Shinagawa K et al (2015) mTOR and PDGF pathway blockade inhibits liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Am J Pathol 185:399–408CrossRefPubMed Yuge R, Kitadai Y, Shinagawa K et al (2015) mTOR and PDGF pathway blockade inhibits liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by modulating the tumor microenvironment. Am J Pathol 185:399–408CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Sperling J, Ziemann C, Gittler A et al (2015) Tumour growth of colorectal rat liver metastases is inhibited by hepatic arterial infusion of the mTOR-inhibitor temsirolimus after portal branch ligation. Clin Exp Metastasis 32:313–321CrossRefPubMed Sperling J, Ziemann C, Gittler A et al (2015) Tumour growth of colorectal rat liver metastases is inhibited by hepatic arterial infusion of the mTOR-inhibitor temsirolimus after portal branch ligation. Clin Exp Metastasis 32:313–321CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Sperling J, Ziemann C, Gittler A et al (2013) Hepatic arterial infusion of temsirolimus inhibits tumor growth of colorectal rat liver metastases even after a growth stimulating procedure like liver resection. J Surg Res 185:587–594CrossRefPubMed Sperling J, Ziemann C, Gittler A et al (2013) Hepatic arterial infusion of temsirolimus inhibits tumor growth of colorectal rat liver metastases even after a growth stimulating procedure like liver resection. J Surg Res 185:587–594CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Fouraschen SM, de Ruiter PE, Kwekkeboom J et al (2013) mTOR signaling in liver regeneration: Rapamycin combined with growth factor treatment. World J Transpl 3:36–47CrossRef Fouraschen SM, de Ruiter PE, Kwekkeboom J et al (2013) mTOR signaling in liver regeneration: Rapamycin combined with growth factor treatment. World J Transpl 3:36–47CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Portal branch ligation does not counteract the inhibiting effect of temsirolimus on extrahepatic colorectal metastatic growth
Authors
Sebastian Senger
Jens Sperling
Barbara Oberkircher
Martin K. Schilling
Otto Kollmar
Michael D. Menger
Christian Ziemann
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Clinical & Experimental Metastasis / Issue 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0262-0898
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7276
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-017-9852-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2017

Clinical & Experimental Metastasis 5/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine