Top

Published in:

01-06-2009

The cytoskeleton and cancer

Author: Alan Hall

Published in: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews | Issue 1-2/2009

Abstract

Cancer is a disease in which many of the characteristics of normal cell behavior are lost or perturbed. Uncontrolled cell proliferation and inappropriate cell survival are common features of all cancers, but in addition defects in cellular morphogenesis that lead to tissue disruption, the acquisition of inappropriate migratory and invasive characteristics and the generation of genomic instability through defects in mitosis also accompany progression of the disease. This volume is focused on the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons, key players that underpin these cellular processes. Actin and tubulin form highly versatile, dynamic polymers that are capable of organizing cytoplasmic organelles and intracellular compartments, defining cell polarity and generating both pushing and contractile forces. In the cell cycle, these two cytoskeletal structures drive chromosomal separation and cell division. During morphogenesis, they determine cell shape and polarity, and promote stable cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions through their interactions with cadherins and integrins, respectively. Finally, during cell migration they generate protrusive forces at the front and retraction forces at the rear. These are all aspects of cell behavior than often go awry in cancer. This volume brings together those interested in understanding the contribution of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons to the cell biology of cancer.

Hall, A. (1998). Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science, 279, 509–514.PubMedCrossRef

Bishop, A. L., & Hall, A. (2000). Rho GTPases and their effector proteins. Biochemical Journal, 348, 241–255.PubMedCrossRef

Ridley, A. J., & Hall, A. (1992). The small GTP-binding protein Rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell, 70, 389–399.PubMedCrossRef

Ridley, A. J., Paterson, H. F., Johnston, C. L., Diekmann, D., & Hall, A. (1992). The small GTP-binding protein Rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. Cell, 70, 401–410.PubMedCrossRef

Nobes, C. D., & Hall, A. (1995). Rho, Rac and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multi-molecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia and filopodia. Cell, 81, 53–62.PubMedCrossRef

Watanabe, N., Kato, T., Fujita, A., Ishizaki, T., & Narumiya, S. (1999). Cooperation between mDia1 and ROCK in Rho-induced actin reorganization. Nature cell biology, 1, 136–143.PubMedCrossRef

Rohatgi, R., Ma, L., Miki, H., Lopez, M., Kirchhausen, T., & Takenawa, T. (1999). The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly. Cell, 97, 221–231.PubMedCrossRef

Eden, S., Rohatgi, R., Podtelejnikov, A. V., Mann, M., & Kirschner, M. W. (2002). Mechanism of regulation of WAVE1-induced actin nucleation by Rac1 and Nck. Nature, 418, 790–793.PubMedCrossRef

Etienne-Manneville, S., & Hall, A. (2002). Rho GTPases in cell biology. Nature, 420, 629–635.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Ewen, M. E., Sluss, H. K., Sherr, C. J., Matsushime, H., Kato, J., & Livingston, D. M. (1993). Functional interactions of the retinoblastoma protein with mammalian D-type cyclins. Cell, 73, 487–497.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Dynlacht, R. B., Flores, O., Lees, J. A., & Harlow, E. (1994). Differential regulation of E2F transactivation by cyclin/cdk2 complexes. Genes & Development, 8, 1772–1286.CrossRef

12.

Malumbres, M., & Barbacid, M. (2003). RAS oncogenes: the first 30 years. Nature reviews Cancer, 3, 459–465.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Gille, H., & Downward, J. (1994). Multiple Ras effector pathways contribute to G1 cell cycle progression. Journal of biological chemistry, 274, 22033–22040.CrossRef

14.

Fu, J., Bian, M., Jiang, Q., & Zhang, C. (2007). Roles of Aurora kinases in mitosis and tumorigenesis. Mol Cancer Rev, 5, 1–10.CrossRef

15.

Boutros, R., Dozier, C., & Ducommun, B. (2006). The when and wheres of CDC25 phosphatases. Current opinion in chemical biology, 18, 185–191.

16.

Larochelle, S., Merrick, K. A., Terret, M. E., Wohlbold, L., Barboza, N. M., & Zhang, C. (2007). Requirements for Cdk7 in the assembly of Cdk1/cyclinB and activation of Cdk2 revealed by chemical genetics in human cells. Molecular cell, 25, 839–850.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Eckerdt, F., & Strebhardt, K. (2006). Polo-like kinase 1: Target and regulator of Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis. Cancer research, 66, 6895–6898.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Pines, J. (2005). Mitosis: a matter of getting rid of the right protein at the right time. Trends in cell biology, 16, 55–63.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Glotzer, M. (2001). Animal cell cytokinesis. AnnualReveview Cell Developments in biologicals, 17, 351–386.

20.

Kops, G. J. P. L., Weaver, B. A. A., & Cleveland, D. W. (2005). On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nature reviews Cancer, 5, 773–785.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Ganem, N. J., Storchova, Z., & Pellman, D. (2007). Tetraploidy, aneuploidy and cancer. Current opinion in genetics & development, 17, 157–162.CrossRef

22.

Dai, W., Wang, Q., Liu, T., Swamy, M., Fang, Y., & Xie, S. (2004). Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BubR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer research, 64, 440–445.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Rao, C. V., Yang, Y. M., Swamy, V. M., Liu, T., Fang, Y., & Mahmood, R. (2005). Colonic tumorigenesis in BubR1+/-ApcMin/+ compound mutant mice is linked to premature separation of sister chromatids and enhanced genomic instability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 4365–4370.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Yamamoto, M., Marui, N., Sakai, T., & Kozaki, S. (1993). ADP-ribosylation of the RhoA gene product by botulinum C3 exoenzyme causes Swiss 3T3 cells to accumulate in the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Oncogene, 8, 1449–14455.PubMed

25.

Olson, M. F., Ashworth, A., & Hall, A. (1995). An essential role for Rho, Rac and Cdc42 GTPases in cell cycle progression through G1. Science, 269, 1270–1272.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Coleman, M. L., Marshall, C. J., & Olson, M. F. (2004). Ras and Rho GTPases in G1-phase cell cycle regulation. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology, 5, 355–366.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Welsh, C. F., Roovers, K., Villanueva, J., Liu, Y., Schwartz, M. A., & Assoian, R. K. (2001). Timing of cyclin D1 expression within G1 phase is controlled by Rho. Nature cell biology, 3, 950–957.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Croft, D. R., & Olson, M. F. (2006). The Rho GTPase effector ROCK regulates cyclin A, cyclin D1 and p27KIP1 levels by distinct mechanisms. Biol Molecular and cellular biology, 26, 4612–4627.CrossRef

29.

Mammoto, A., Huang, S., Moore, K., Oh, P., & Ingber, D. E. (2004). Role of RhoA, mDia and ROCK in cell shape-dependent control of the Skp-p27^kip1 pathway and the G1/s transition. Journal of biological chemistry, 279, 26323–26330.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Vidal, A., Millard, S. S., Miller, J. P., & Koff, A. (2002). Rho activity can alter the translation of p27 mRNA and is important for RasV12-induced transformation in a manner dependent on p27 status. Journal of biological chemistry, 277, 16433–16440.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rosenblatt, J., Cramer, L. P., Baum, B., & McGee, M. (2004). Myosin II-dependent cortical movement is required for centrosome separation and positioning during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell, 117, 361–372.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Maddox, A. S., & Burridge, K. (2003). RhoA is required for cortical retraction and rigidity during mitotic cell rounding. Journal of cell biology, 160, 255–265.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Yasuda, S., Oceguera-Yanez, F., Kato, T., Okamoto, M., Yonemura, S., & Terada, Y. (2004). Cdc42 and mDia3 regulate microtubule attachment to kinetochores. Nature, 428, 767–771.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Oceguera-Yanez, F., Kimura, K., Yasuda, S., Higashida, C., Kitamura, T., & Hiraoka, Y. (2005). Ect2 and MgcRacGAP regulate activation and function of Cdc42 in mitosis. Journal of cell biology, 168, 221–232.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Bakal, C. J., Finn, D., LaRose, J., Wells, C. D., Gish, G., & Kulkarni, S. (2005). The Rho GTP exchange factor Lfc promotes spindle assembly in early mitosis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 9529–9534.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Betschinger, J., & Knoblich, J. A. (2004). Dare to be different: asymmetric cell division in Drosophila, C. elegans and vertebrates. Current biology, 14, R674–685.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Schonegg, S., & Hyman, A. A. (2006). Cdc42 and Rho-1 coordinate acto-myosin contractility and PAR protein localization during polarity establishment in C. elegans embryos. Development, 133, 3507–3516.PubMedCrossRef

38.

Aceto, D., Beers, M., & Kemphues, K. J. (2006). Interaction of Par-6 with Cdc42 is required for maintenance but not establishment of PAR asymmetry in C. elegans. Developments in biologicals, 299, 386–397.CrossRef

39.

Narumiya, S., & Yasuda, S. (2006). Rho GTPases in animal cell mitosis. Current opinion in chemical biology, 18, 199–205.

40.

Naim, V., Imarisio, S., Di Cunto, F., Gatti, M., & Bonaccorsi, S. (2004). Drosophila citron kinase is required for the final steps of cytokinesis. Molecular biology of the cell, 15, 5053−5063.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Schmidt, A., Durgan, J., Magalhaes, A., & Hall, A. (2007). Rho GTPases regulate PRK2 to control entry into mitosis and exit from mitosis. EMBO Jounal, 26, 1624−1636.

42.

Roh, M. H., & Margolis, B. (2003). Composition and function of PDZ protein complexes during cell polarization. Am J Renal Physiol, 285, F377−387.

43.

Medina, E., Lemmers, C., Lane-Guermonprez, L., & Le Bivic, A. (2002). Role of Crumbs complex in the regulation of junction formation in Drosophila and mammalian epithelial cells. Biology of the cell, 94, 305–313.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Kirby, C., Kusch, M., & Kemphues, K. (1990). Mutations in the par genes of C. elegans affect cytoplasmic reorganization during first cell cycle. Developments in biologicals, 142, 203–215.CrossRef

45.

Etienne-Manneville, S., & Hall, A. (2001). Integrin-mediated activation of Ccd42 controls cell polarity in migrating astrocytes through PKCζ. Cell, 106, 489–498.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Izumi, Y., Hirose, T., Tamai, Y., Hirai, S., Nagashima, Y., & Fujimoto, T. (1998). An atypical PKC directly associates and colocalizes at the epithelial tight junction with ASIP, a mammalian homologue of C. elegans polarity protein Par-3. Journal of cell biology, 143, 95–106.PubMedCrossRef

47.

Shi, S. H., Jan, L. Y., & Jan, Y. N. (2003). Hippocampal neuronal polarity specified by spatially localized mPar3/mPar6 and PI 3-kinase activity. Cell, 112, 63–75.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Macara, I. (2004). Par proteins: partners in polarization. Current biology, 14, 160–162.

49.

Elbert, M., Cohen, D., & Musch, A. (2006). Par1b promotes cell-cell adhesion and inhibits disheveled-mediated transformation of MDCK cells. Molecular biology of the cell, 17, 3345–3355.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Hardie, D. G. (2005). New roles for the LKB1-AMPK pathway. Current opinion in chemical biology, 17, 167–173.

51.

Hemminke, A. (1998). A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature, 391, 184–187.CrossRef

52.

Shaw, R. J., Bardeesy, N., Manning, B. D., Lopez, L., Kosmatka, M., & DePinho, R. A. (2004). The LKB tumor suppressor negatively regulates mTOR signaling. Cancer Cell, 6, 91–99.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Martin, S. G., & St Johnston, D. (2003). A role for Drosophila LKB1 in anterior-posterior axis formation and epithelial polarity. Nature, 421, 379–384.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Baas, A. F., Kuipers, J., van der Wel, N. N., Batle, E., Koerten, H. K., Peters, P. J., et al. (2004). Complete polarization of single intestinal epithelial cells upon activation of LKB1 by STRAD. Cell, 116, 457–466.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Van Aelst, L., & Symons, M. (2002). Role of Rho family GTPases in epithelial morphogenesis. Genes & Development, 16, 1032–1054.CrossRef

56.

Hutterer, A., Betschinegr, J., Petronczki, M., & Knoblich, J. A. (2004). Sequential roles of Cdc42, Par6, aPKC and Lgl in the establishment of epithelial polarity during Drosophila embryogenesis. Developments in cell, 6, 845–854.CrossRef

57.

Sotillos, S., Diaz-Mecco, M. T., Caminero, E., Moscat, J., & Campuzano, S. (2004). DaPKC-dependent phosphorylation of Crumbs is required for epithelial cell polarity in Drosophila. Journal of cell biology, 166, 549–557.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Betschinger, J., Eisenhaber, F., & Knoblich, J. A. (2005). Phosphorylation-induced autoinhibition regulates the cytoskeletal protein Lethal (2) giant larvae. Current biology, 15, 276–282.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Hurd, T. W., Gao, L., Roh, M. H., Macara, I. G., & Margolis, B. (2003). Direct interaction of two polarity complexes implicated in epithelial tight junction assembly. Nature cell biology, 5, 137–142.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Braga, V. M. M., Machesky, L., Hall, A., & Hotchin, N. A. (1997). The small GTPases Rho and Rac are required for the establishment of cadherin-dependent cell-cell contacts. Journal of cell biology, 137, 1421–1431.PubMedCrossRef

61.

Takaishi, K., Sasaki, T., Kotani, H., Nishioka, H., & Takai, Y. (1997). Regulation of cell-cell adhesion by rac and rho small G proteins in MDCK cells. Journal of cell biology, 139, 1047–1059.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Fox, D. T., Homem, C. C., Myster, S. H., Wang, F., Bain, E. E., & Peifer, M. (2005). Rho1 regulates Drosophila adherens junctions independently of p120ctn. Development, 132, 4819–4831.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Vasioukhin, V., Bauer, C., Yin, M., & Fuchs, E. (2000). Directed actin polymerization is the driving force for epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Cell, 100, 209–219.PubMedCrossRef

64.

Ehrlich, J. S., Hansen, M. D., & Nelson, W. J. (2002). Spatio-temporal regulation of Rac1 localization and lamellipodia dynamics in epithelial cell-cell adhesion. Developments in cell, 3, 259–270.CrossRef

65.

Fukuhara, T., Shimizu, K., Kawakatsu, T., Fukuyama, T., Minami, Y., Honda, T., et al. (2004). Activation of Cdc42 by trans interactions of cell adhesion molecules nectins through c-Src, Cdc42-GEF FRG. Journal of cell biology, 166, 393–405.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Yang, J., & Weinberg, R. A. (2008). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Development in Cell, 14, 818–829.CrossRef

67.

Mani, S. A., Guo, W., Liao, M. J., Eaton, E. N., Ayyanan, A., Zhou, A. Y., et al. (2008). The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell, 133, 704–715.PubMedCrossRef

68.

Bilder, D. (2004). Epithelial polarity and proliferation control: links form the Drosophila neoplastic tumor suppressors. Genes & Development, 18, 1909–1925.CrossRef

69.

Pagliarini, R. A., & Xu, T. (2003). A genetic screen in Drosophila for metastatic behavior. Science, 302, 1227–1231.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Humbert, P., Russell, S., & Richardson, H. (2003). Dlg, Scribble and Lgl in cell polarity, cell proliferation and cancer. Bioassays, 25, 542–553.CrossRef

71.

Thomas, M., Massimi, P., Navarro, C., Borg, J. P., & Banks, L. (2005). The hScrib/Dlg apico-basal control complex is differentially targeted by HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 proteins. Oncogene, 24, 6222–6230.PubMedCrossRef

72.

Yuan, B. Z., Miller, M. J., Keck, C. L., Zimonjic, D. B., Thorgeirsson, S. S., & Popescu, N. C. (1998). Cloning, characterization, and chromosomal localization of a gene frequently deleted in human liver cancer (DLC-1) homologous to rat RhoGAP. Cancer research, 58, 2196–2199.PubMed

73.

Xue, W., Krasnitz, A., Lucito, R., Sordella, R., Vanaelst, L., Cordon-Cardo, C., et al. (2008). DLC1 is a chromosome 8p tumor suppressor whose loss promotes hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes & Development, 22, 1439–1444.CrossRef

74.

Brodu, V., & Casanova, J. (2006). The RhoGAP crossveinless-c links trachealess and EGFR signaling to cell shape remodeling in Drosophila tracheal invagination. Genes & Development, 20, 1817–1828.CrossRef

75.

Raftopoulou, M., & Hall, A. (2004). Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Developments in biologicals, 265, 23–32.CrossRef

76.

Lehman, R. (2001). Cell migration in invertebrates: clues from border and distal tip cells. Current opinion in genetics & development, 11, 457–463.CrossRef

77.

Condeelis, J. S., Wyckoff, J., & Segall, J. E. (2000). Imaging of cancer invasion and metastasis using green fluorescent protein. European journal of cancer, 36, 1671–1680.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Stebler, J., Spieler, D., Slanchev, K., Molyneaux, K. A., Richter, U., Cojocaru, V., et al. (2004). Primordial germ cell migration in the chick and mouse embryo: the role of the chemokine SDF-1/CXCL12. Developments in biologicals, 272, 351–361.CrossRef

79.

Schmitz, A. A., Govek, E. E., Bottner, B., & Van Aelst, L. (2000). Rho GTPases: signaling, migration and invasion. Experimental cell research, 261, 1–12.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Pertz, O., Hodgson, L., Klemke, R. L., & Hahn, K. M. (2006). Spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity in migrating cells. Nature, 440, 1069–1072.PubMedCrossRef

81.

Wittmann, T., & Waterman-Storer, C. M. (2001). Cell motility: can Rho GTPases and microtubules point the way. Journal of Cell Science, 114, 3795–3803.PubMed

82.

Tanaka, T., Serneo, F. F., Higgins, C., Gambello, M. J., Wynshaw-Boris, A., & Gleeson, J. G. (2004). Lis1 and doublecortin function with dynein to mediate coupling of the nucleus to the centrosome in neuronal migration. Journal of cell biology, 165, 709–721.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Sahai, E., & Marshall, C. J. (2003). Differing modes of tumour cell invasion have distinct requirements for Rho/ROCK signaling and extracellular proteolysis. Nature cell biology, 5, 711–719.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Pankov, R., Endo, Y., Even-Ram, S., Araki, M., Clark, K., & Cukierman, E. (2005). A Rac switch regulates random versus directionally persistent cell migration. Journal of cell biology, 170, 793–802.PubMedCrossRef

85.

Devreotes, P., & Janetopoulos, C. (2003). Eukaryotic chemotaxis: distinctions between directional sensing and polarization. Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 20445–20448.PubMedCrossRef

86.

Nobes, C. D., & Hall, A. (1999). Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion and adhesion during cell movement. Journal of cell biology, 144, 1235–1244.PubMedCrossRef

87.

Srinivasan, S., Wang, F., Glavas, S., Ott, A., Hofmann, F., & Aktories, K. (2003). Rac and Cdc42 play distinct roles in regulating PI(3,4,5)P3 and polarity during neutrophil chemotaxis. Journal of cell biology, 160, 375–385.PubMedCrossRef

88.

Li, Z., Hannigan, M., Mo, Z., Liu, B., Lu, W., Wu, Y., et al. (2003). Directional sensing requires G beta gamma-mediated PAK1 and PIX-alpha-dependent activation of Cdc42. Cell, 114, 215–227.PubMedCrossRef

89.

Iijima, M., & Devreotes, P. (2002). Tumor suppressor PTEN mediates sensing of chemoattractant gradients. Cell, 109, 599–610.PubMedCrossRef

90.

Van Keymeulen, A., Wong, K., Knight, Z. A., Govaerts, C., Hahn, K. M., & Shokat, K. M. (2006). To stabilize neutrophil polarity, PIP3 and Cdc42 augment RhoA activity at the back as well as signals at the front. Journal of cell biology, 174, 437–445.PubMedCrossRef

91.

Gomes, E. R., Jani, S., & Gundersen, G. G. (2005). Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization. Cell, 121, 451–463.PubMedCrossRef

92.

Tzima, E., Kiosses, W. B., del Pozo, M. A., & Schwartz, M. A. (2003). Localized Cdc42 activation detected using a novel assay, mediates microtubule organizing center positioning in endothelial cells in response to fluid stress. Journal of biological chemistry, 278, 31020–31023.PubMedCrossRef

93.

Etienne-Manneville, S., & Hall, A. (2003). Cdc42 regulates GSK3b and adenomatous polyposis coli to control cell polarity. Nature, 421, 753–756.PubMedCrossRef

94.

Etienne-Manneville, S., Manneville, J. B., Nicholls, S., Ferenczi, M. A., & Hall, A. (2005). Cdc42 and Par6-PKCz regulate the spatially localized association of Dlg1 and APC to control cell polarization. Journal of cell biology, 170, 895–901.PubMedCrossRef

95.

Schlessinger, K., McManus, E. J., & Hall, A. (2007). Cdc42 and non-canonical Wnt signal transduction pathways cooperate to promote cell polarity. Journal of cell biology, 178, 355–361.PubMedCrossRef

96.

Cau, J., & Hall, A. (2005). Cdc42 controls the polarity of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons through two distinct signal transduction pathways. Journal of Cell Science, 118, 2579–2587.PubMedCrossRef

Title: The cytoskeleton and cancer
Author: Alan Hall
Publication date: 01-06-2009
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Cancer and Metastasis Reviews / Issue 1-2/2009
Print ISSN: 0167-7659
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-008-9166-3

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras

Prof. Fabrice Barlesi

Developed by: Springer Medicine

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1-2/2009

Tumor stroma derived biomarkers in cancer

Role of DLC-1, a tumor suppressor protein with RhoGAP activity, in regulation of the cytoskeleton and cell motility

Osteosarcoma treatment: state of the art

The unfolded protein response during prostate cancer development

Targeting group II PAKs in cancer and metastasis

Signal transduction by focal adhesion kinase in cancer

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer