Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2019

01-03-2019 | Original Paper

A phantom based evaluation of vessel lumen area quantification for coronary CT angiography

Authors: Sabee Molloi, Travis Johnson, Jerry Lipinski, Huanjun Ding, Logan Hubbard

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography is a noninvasive method for visualizing coronary artery disease. However, coronary CT angiography is limited in assessment of stenosis severity by the partial volume effect and calcification. Therefore, an accurate method for assessment of stenosis severity is needed. A 10 cm diameter cylindrical Lucite phantom with holes in the range of 0.4–4.5 mm diameter was fitted in a chest phantom. The holes were filled with an iodine solution of 8 mg/mL. To simulate coronary artery disease, different levels of stenosis were created by inserting Lucite rods into the holes with diameter range of 2–4.5 mm. The resulting lumen cross sectional areas ranged from 1.4 to 12.3 mm2. To simulate arterial calcification, calcium hydroxyapatite rods were inserted into the holes with diameter range of 2–4.5 mm. Images of the phantoms were acquired at 100 kVp using a 320-slice CT scanner. A maual and a semi-automated technique based on integrated Hounsfield units was used to calculate vessel cross-sectional area. There was an excellent correlation between the measured and the known cross-sectional area for both normal and stenotic vessels using the manual and the semi-automated techniques. However, the overall measurement error for the manual method was more than twice as compared with the integrated HU technique. Determination of vessel lumen area using the semi-automated integrated Hounsfield unit technique yields more than a factor of two improvement in precision and accuracy as compared to the existing manual technique for vessels with and without stenosis. This technique can also be used to accurately measure arterial cross-sectional area in the presence of coronary calcification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Daniel WG (2001) Noninvasive coronary angiography—an acceptable alternative? N Engl J Med 345(26):1909–1910CrossRefPubMed Achenbach S, Daniel WG (2001) Noninvasive coronary angiography—an acceptable alternative? N Engl J Med 345(26):1909–1910CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Budoff MJ et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(21):1724–1732CrossRefPubMed Budoff MJ et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(21):1724–1732CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS (2010) The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(10):957–965CrossRefPubMed Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS (2010) The present state of coronary computed tomography angiography a process in evolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(10):957–965CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Goldstein JA et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(8):863–871CrossRef Goldstein JA et al (2007) A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol 49(8):863–871CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Meijboom WB et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(8):636–643CrossRefPubMed Meijboom WB et al (2008) Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(8):636–643CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Nissen SE (2008) Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(25):2145–2147CrossRefPubMed Nissen SE (2008) Limitations of computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 52(25):2145–2147CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Marwan M et al (2011) Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(1):113–118CrossRefPubMed Marwan M et al (2011) Coronary vessel and luminal area measurement using dual-source computed tomography in comparison with intravascular ultrasound: effect of window settings on measurement accuracy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35(1):113–118CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jiayin Z et al (2015) Quantification of coronary artery stenosis by area stenosis from cardiac CT angiography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:695–698 Jiayin Z et al (2015) Quantification of coronary artery stenosis by area stenosis from cardiac CT angiography. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2015:695–698
10.
go back to reference Kruk M et al (2014) Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(1):49–58CrossRefPubMed Kruk M et al (2014) Impact of coronary artery calcium characteristics on accuracy of CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 7(1):49–58CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Miller JM et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359(22):2324–2336CrossRefPubMed Miller JM et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359(22):2324–2336CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fuchs A et al (2015) Feasibility of coronary calcium and stent image subtraction using 320-detector row CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(5):393–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fuchs A et al (2015) Feasibility of coronary calcium and stent image subtraction using 320-detector row CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 9(5):393–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Huo Y et al (2012) A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve. J R Soc Interface 9(71):1325–1338CrossRefPubMed Huo Y et al (2012) A validated predictive model of coronary fractional flow reserve. J R Soc Interface 9(71):1325–1338CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Molloi S et al (2017) Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(3):411–419CrossRefPubMed Molloi S et al (2017) Accurate quantification of vessel cross-sectional area using CT angiography: a simulation study. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(3):411–419CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Leber AW et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154CrossRefPubMed Leber AW et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(1):147–154CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vavere AL et al (2011) Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 261(1):100–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Vavere AL et al (2011) Coronary artery stenoses: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 261(1):100–108CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Abdulla J et al (2012) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(4):943–953CrossRefPubMed Abdulla J et al (2012) Influence of coronary calcification on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28(4):943–953CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim HJ et al (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3195–3209CrossRefPubMed Kim HJ et al (2010) Patient-specific modeling of blood flow and pressure in human coronary arteries. Ann Biomed Eng 38(10):3195–3209CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Koo BK et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1989–1997CrossRefPubMed Koo BK et al (2011) Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(19):1989–1997CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A phantom based evaluation of vessel lumen area quantification for coronary CT angiography
Authors
Sabee Molloi
Travis Johnson
Jerry Lipinski
Huanjun Ding
Logan Hubbard
Publication date
01-03-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1452-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 3/2019 Go to the issue