Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2019

Open Access 01-01-2019 | Original Paper

CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome

Authors: Pei G. Chew, Laura E. Dobson, Pankaj Garg, Timothy A. Fairbairn, Tarique A. Musa, Akhlaque Uddin, Peter P. Swoboda, James R. Foley, Graham J. Fent, Louise A. E. Brown, Sebastian Onciul, Sven Plein, Daniel J. Blackman, John P. Greenwood

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 1/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Current echocardiographic data reporting the impact of concomitant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcome in patients who undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are conflicting. Using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging, this study aimed to assess the impact of MR severity on cardiac reverse remodeling and patient outcome. 85 patients undergoing TAVR with CMR pre- and 6 m post-TAVR were evaluated. The CMR protocol included cines for left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) volumes, flow assessment, and myocardial scar assessment by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients were dichotomised according to CMR severity of MR fraction at baseline (‘non-significant’ vs ‘significant’) and followed up for a median duration of 3 years. Forty-two (49%) patients had ‘significant MR’ at baseline; they had similar LV and RV size and function compared to the ‘non-significant MR’ group but had greater LV mass at baseline. In those with significant MR at baseline, 77% (n = 32) had a reduction in MR post-TAVR, moving them into the ‘non-significant’ category at 6-months, with an overall reduction in MR fraction from 34 to 17% (p < 0.001). Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable cardiac reverse remodeling when compared with the ‘non-improvers’. Significant MR at baseline was not associated with increased mortality at follow-up. Significant MR is common in patients undergoing TAVR and improves in the majority post-procedure. Improvement in MR was not associated with more favourable LV reverse remodeling and baseline MR severity was not associated with mortality.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
10.
go back to reference Gelfand EVMW (2007) Assessment of valvular heart disease with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Indian J Radiol Imaging 17:120–132CrossRef Gelfand EVMW (2007) Assessment of valvular heart disease with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Indian J Radiol Imaging 17:120–132CrossRef
13.
20.
go back to reference Gelfand E, Hughes S, Yeon S (2006) Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 8:503–507CrossRefPubMed Gelfand E, Hughes S, Yeon S (2006) Severity of mitral and aortic regurgitation as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: optimizing correlation with Doppler echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 8:503–507CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
CMR quantitation of change in mitral regurgitation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): impact on left ventricular reverse remodeling and outcome
Authors
Pei G. Chew
Laura E. Dobson
Pankaj Garg
Timothy A. Fairbairn
Tarique A. Musa
Akhlaque Uddin
Peter P. Swoboda
James R. Foley
Graham J. Fent
Louise A. E. Brown
Sebastian Onciul
Sven Plein
Daniel J. Blackman
John P. Greenwood
Publication date
01-01-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-018-1441-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 1/2019 Go to the issue