Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2015

01-12-2015 | Original Paper

Subtraction coronary computed tomography in patients with severe calcification

Authors: Makoto Amanuma, Takeshi Kondo, Tomonari Sano, Takako Sekine, Tomoya Takayanagi, Hideyuki Matsutani, Takehiro Arai, Hitomi Morita, Kazumasa Ishizaka, Kazumasa Arakita, Akiko Iwasa, Shinichi Takase

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

To investigate the clinical usefulness of subtraction coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) in patients with severe calcification. A 320-row area detector CT system was used in this study. The subjects were 78 patients (47 men and 31 women, 739 years of age) with an Agatston score of >300 who were able to undergo prospective one-beat scanning during a single breath-hold. The CCTA findings were compared against invasive coronary angiography. The diagnostic capabilities of CCTA for the severely calcified segments with and without the additional information provided by subtraction CCTA were compared. Severe calcification was observed in 174 (31.9 %) of the 546 segments, and non-assessable regions were observed in 74 (13.6 %) of the segments. The addition of subtraction CCTA information improved the diagnostic accuracy for segments with severe calcification from 67.8 to 82.8 % on a per-segment basis and from 70.1 to 82.1 % on a per-patient basis, with non-assessable segments considered to be stenotic. When non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis, the diagnostic accuracy was improved from 48.3 to 75.9 % on a per-segment basis and from 43.3 to 79.1 % on a per-patient basis. In addition, when evaluation was limited to non-assessable segments, subtraction CCTA provided a diagnostic accuracy of 81.1 % when non-assessable segments were considered to be stenotic or 66.2 % when non-assessable segments were considered to be an incorrect diagnosis. Subtraction CCTA improves the diagnostic capabilities of CCTA in patients with severe calcification.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bastarrika G, Lee YS, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2009) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 253:317–338CrossRefPubMed Bastarrika G, Lee YS, Huda W, Ruzsics B, Costello P, Schoepf UJ (2009) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 253:317–338CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Dewey M (2011) Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT—the role of CT angiography. Radiology 258:329–339CrossRefPubMed Dewey M (2011) Coronary CT versus MR angiography: pro CT—the role of CT angiography. Radiology 258:329–339CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864–1894CrossRefPubMed Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM et al (2010) ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 appropriate use criteria for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1864–1894CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, Schmid FT, Lieberknecht M, Schulze R et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478CrossRefPubMed Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, Schmid FT, Lieberknecht M, Schulze R et al (2005) Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 293:2471–2478CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Palumbo AA, Maffei E, Martini C, Tarantini G, Di Tanna GL, Berti E et al (2009) Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: per-segment and per-patient analysis. Eur Radiol 19:2127–2135CrossRefPubMed Palumbo AA, Maffei E, Martini C, Tarantini G, Di Tanna GL, Berti E et al (2009) Coronary calcium score as gatekeeper for 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with chest pain: per-segment and per-patient analysis. Eur Radiol 19:2127–2135CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ahn SJ, Kang DK, Sun JS, Yoon MH (2013) Accuracy and predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary heart disease in patients with an Agatston calcium score above 400. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(3):387–394CrossRefPubMed Ahn SJ, Kang DK, Sun JS, Yoon MH (2013) Accuracy and predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography for the detection of obstructive coronary heart disease in patients with an Agatston calcium score above 400. J Comput Assist Tomogr 37(3):387–394CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K (2012) Subtraction coronary CT angiography for calcified lesions. Cardiol Clin 30:93–102CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K (2012) Subtraction coronary CT angiography for calcified lesions. Cardiol Clin 30:93–102CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Muranaka K (2013) Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:75–81CrossRefPubMed Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Muranaka K (2013) Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:75–81CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I et al (2011) Coronary artery stenosis: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 261:100–108PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Vavere AL, Arbab-Zadeh A, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, Niinuma H, Gottlieb I et al (2011) Coronary artery stenosis: accuracy of 64-detector row CT angiography in segments with mild, moderate, or severe calcification—a subanalysis of the CORE-64 trial. Radiology 261:100–108PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Amanuma M, Kondo T, Arai T, Morita H, Matsutani H, Sekine T et al (2015) Segmental distribution of calcifications and non-assessable lesions on coronary computed tomographic angiography: evaluation in symptomatic patients. Jpn J Radiol 33:122–130CrossRefPubMed Amanuma M, Kondo T, Arai T, Morita H, Matsutani H, Sekine T et al (2015) Segmental distribution of calcifications and non-assessable lesions on coronary computed tomographic angiography: evaluation in symptomatic patients. Jpn J Radiol 33:122–130CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler C, Dill T, Fischbach R, Knez A et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of β-adrenergic receptor blockage to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257:614–623CrossRefPubMed Mahabadi AA, Achenbach S, Burgstahler C, Dill T, Fischbach R, Knez A et al (2010) Safety, efficacy, and indications of β-adrenergic receptor blockage to reduce heart rate prior to coronary CT angiography. Radiology 257:614–623CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR, Viamonte M Jr, Detrano R (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15:827–832CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Taguchi K, Oda S, Shimonobo T, Yamashita Y (2014) Automatic exposure control at single- and dual-heartbeat CTCA on a 320-MDCT volume scanner: effect of heart rate, exposure phase window setting, and reconstruction algorithm. Phys Med 30:385–390CrossRefPubMed Funama Y, Utsunomiya D, Taguchi K, Oda S, Shimonobo T, Yamashita Y (2014) Automatic exposure control at single- and dual-heartbeat CTCA on a 320-MDCT volume scanner: effect of heart rate, exposure phase window setting, and reconstruction algorithm. Phys Med 30:385–390CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, Kumamaru KK, Schultz K, Mather RT et al (2013) Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1167–1175PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chen MY, Steigner ML, Leung SW, Kumamaru KK, Schultz K, Mather RT et al (2013) Simulated 50 % radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29:1167–1175PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Mayer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated Radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507CrossRefPubMed Hausleiter J, Mayer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated Radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Razeto M, Matthews J, Masood S, Steel J, Arakita K. Accurate registration of coronary arteries for volumetric CT digital subtraction angiography. ICGIP 2012 Proc SPIE, vol 8768, p 876834-1 Razeto M, Matthews J, Masood S, Steel J, Arakita K. Accurate registration of coronary arteries for volumetric CT digital subtraction angiography. ICGIP 2012 Proc SPIE, vol 8768, p 876834-1
17.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40CrossRefPubMed Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, Gensini GG, Gott VL, Griffith LS et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2012) Use of 3 × 2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies. BMJ 24(345):e6717CrossRef Schuetz GM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M (2012) Use of 3 × 2 tables with an intention to diagnose approach to assess clinical performance of diagnostic tests: meta-analytical evaluation of coronary CT angiography studies. BMJ 24(345):e6717CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K, Sasaki T, Ueda T, Chiba T, Takeda K, Sugawara T (2015) Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(Suppl 1):51–58CrossRefPubMed Yoshioka K, Tanaka R, Muranaka K, Sasaki T, Ueda T, Chiba T, Takeda K, Sugawara T (2015) Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 31(Suppl 1):51–58CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E, Ueno E (2015) Current and novel imaging techniques in coronary CT. Radiographics 35:991–1010CrossRefPubMed Machida H, Tanaka I, Fukui R, Shen Y, Ishikawa T, Tate E, Ueno E (2015) Current and novel imaging techniques in coronary CT. Radiographics 35:991–1010CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Sano T, Matsutani H, Kondo T, Fujimoto S, Takamura K, Sekine T et al (2013) Prrospective electrocardiogram gated coronary 320-row area detector computed tomography angiography using low tube current scanning with full reconstruction. Jpn J Radiat Technol 69:244–250CrossRef Sano T, Matsutani H, Kondo T, Fujimoto S, Takamura K, Sekine T et al (2013) Prrospective electrocardiogram gated coronary 320-row area detector computed tomography angiography using low tube current scanning with full reconstruction. Jpn J Radiat Technol 69:244–250CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753CrossRefPubMed Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA, Curry CA, Lane JL, Jennings RS et al (2008) Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology 246:742–753CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Subtraction coronary computed tomography in patients with severe calcification
Authors
Makoto Amanuma
Takeshi Kondo
Tomonari Sano
Takako Sekine
Tomoya Takayanagi
Hideyuki Matsutani
Takehiro Arai
Hitomi Morita
Kazumasa Ishizaka
Kazumasa Arakita
Akiko Iwasa
Shinichi Takase
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-015-0746-3

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 8/2015 Go to the issue