Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2013

01-02-2013 | Original Paper

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease

Authors: F. Pelliccia, V. Pasceri, A. Evangelista, A. Pergolini, F. Barillà, N. Viceconte, G. Tanzilli, M. Schiariti, C. Greco, C. Gaudio

Published in: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography (CT) scanners is feasible with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. The radiation exposure associated with this technique, however, is high and concerns in the widespread use of CT have arisen. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of coronary angiography using 320-row CT, which avoids exposure-intensive overscanning and overranging. We prospectively studied 118 unselected consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA). All patients had 320-row CT within 1 week of ICA, which, together with quantitative analysis, served as the reference standard. Of the 65 out of 118 patients who were diagnosed as having CAD by ICA, 64 (98 %) were correctly identified at 320-row CT. Noteworthy, 320-row CT correctly detected CAD in 3 patients with atrial fibrillation and ruled out the disease in the other 8 patients. From 151 significant coronary stenoses detected on ICA, 137 (91 %) were correctly identified with 320-row CT. In the per-patient analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 98 and 91 %, respectively. In the per-vessel analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 93 and 95 %, respectively. In the per segment analysis, sensitivity and specificity of 320-row CT were 91 and 99 %, respectively. Diameter stenosis determined with the use of CT showed good correlation with ICA (P < 0.001, R = 0.81) without significant underestimation or overestimation (−3.1 ± 24.4 %; P = 0.08). Comparison of CT with ICA revealed a significantly smaller effective radiation dose (3.1 ± 2.3 vs. 6.5 ± 4.2 mSv; P < 0.05) and amount of contrast agent required (99 ± 51 vs. 65 ± 42 ml, P < 0.05) for 320 row CT. The present study in an unselected population including patients with atrial fibrillation demonstrates that 320-row CT may significantly reduce the radiation dose and amount of contrast agent required compared with ICA while maintaining a very high diagnostic accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336PubMedCrossRef Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 359:2324–2336PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:2135–2144PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRef Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al (2008) Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:1724–1732PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM et al (2011) Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 171:1021–1029PubMed Chow BJ, Freeman MR, Bowen JM et al (2011) Ontario multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography study: field evaluation of diagnostic accuracy. Arch Intern Med 171:1021–1029PubMed
5.
go back to reference Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840–1845PubMedCrossRef Coles DR, Smail MA, Negus IS et al (2006) Comparison of radiation doses from multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and conventional diagnostic angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1840–1845PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef Rybicki FJ, Otero HJ, Steigner ML et al (2008) Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 24:535–546PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, May J, Rogalla P (2009) Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol 19:1148–1155PubMedCrossRef Hein PA, Romano VC, Lembcke A, May J, Rogalla P (2009) Initial experience with a chest pain protocol using 320-slice volume MDCT. Eur Radiol 19:1148–1155PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A et al (2011) Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 261:779–786PubMedCrossRef Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A et al (2011) Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study. Radiology 261:779–786PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M et al (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:328–337PubMedCrossRef Achenbach S, Goroll T, Seltmann M et al (2011) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by low-dose, prospectively ECG-triggered, high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 4:328–337PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gaudio C, Evangelista A, Pasceri V et al (2011) Visualization of coronary arteries and coronary stents by low dose 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 151:e6–e7PubMedCrossRef Gaudio C, Evangelista A, Pasceri V et al (2011) Visualization of coronary arteries and coronary stents by low dose 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography in a patient with atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol 151:e6–e7PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317–323PubMedCrossRef Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S (2007) Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 298:317–323PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44PubMedCrossRef Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al (2003) Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 138:40–44PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Engelken FJ, Lembcke A, Hamm B, Dewey M (2009) Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation. Acad Radiol 16:239–243PubMedCrossRef Engelken FJ, Lembcke A, Hamm B, Dewey M (2009) Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation. Acad Radiol 16:239–243PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dewey M (2008) Examination and reconstruction. In: Dewey M (ed) Coronary CT angiography. Springer, Heidelberg Dewey M (2008) Examination and reconstruction. In: Dewey M (ed) Coronary CT angiography. Springer, Heidelberg
16.
go back to reference Weigold WG, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2011) Standardized medical terminology for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:136–144PubMedCrossRef Weigold WG, Abbara S, Achenbach S et al (2011) Standardized medical terminology for cardiac computed tomography: a report of the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 5:136–144PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40PubMedCrossRef Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al (1975) A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease: report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 51:5–40PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M et al (2004) Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool. Rofo 176:478–483PubMedCrossRef Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M et al (2004) Multislice CT coronary angiography: evaluation of an automatic vessel detection tool. Rofo 176:478–483PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Waters D, Lespérance J, Craven TE, Hudon G, Gillam LD (1993) Advantages and limitations of serial coronary arteriography for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis: implications for clinical trials. Circulation 87(Suppl II):38–47 Waters D, Lespérance J, Craven TE, Hudon G, Gillam LD (1993) Advantages and limitations of serial coronary arteriography for the assessment of progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis: implications for clinical trials. Circulation 87(Suppl II):38–47
20.
go back to reference Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ et al (1985) Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71:280–288PubMedCrossRef Reiber JH, Serruys PW, Kooijman CJ et al (1985) Assessment of short-, medium-, and long-term variations in arterial dimensions from computer-assisted quantitation of coronary cineangiograms. Circulation 71:280–288PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:728–733PubMedCrossRef Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K et al (2009) High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results. Invest Radiol 44:728–733PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lobotessi H, Karoussou A, Neofotistou V, Louisi A, Tsapaki V (2001) Effective dose to a patient undergoing coronary angiography. Radiat Prot Dosim 94:173–176CrossRef Lobotessi H, Karoussou A, Neofotistou V, Louisi A, Tsapaki V (2001) Effective dose to a patient undergoing coronary angiography. Radiat Prot Dosim 94:173–176CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H et al (2011) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 32:1316–1330PubMedCrossRef Genders TS, Steyerberg EW, Alkadhi H et al (2011) A clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: validation, updating, and extension. Eur Heart J 32:1316–1330PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310 Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet i:307–310
26.
go back to reference de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915PubMedCrossRef de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, van Velzen JE et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 31:1908–1915PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867–875PubMedCrossRef Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al (2009) Noninvasive coronary angiography by 320-row computed tomography with lower radiation exposure and maintained diagnostic accuracy: comparison of results with cardiac catheterization in a head-to-head pilot investigation. Circulation 120:867–875PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Nasis A, Leung MC, Antonis PR et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with 320-detector row computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 106:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef Nasis A, Leung MC, Antonis PR et al (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography with 320-detector row computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 106:1429–1435PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, Kroft LJ et al (2011) Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:1–12 van Velzen JE, de Graaf FR, Kroft LJ et al (2011) Performance and efficacy of 320-row computed tomography coronary angiography in patients presenting with acute chest pain: results from a clinical registry. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 26:1–12
30.
go back to reference Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, Xu L, Yu W, Wang R (2011) 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1059–1068PubMedCrossRef Zhang C, Zhang Z, Yan Z, Xu L, Yu W, Wang R (2011) 320-row CT coronary angiography: effect of 100-kV tube voltages on image quality, contrast volume, and radiation dose. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1059–1068PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vanhecke TE, Madder RD, Weber JE, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:490–497PubMedCrossRef Vanhecke TE, Madder RD, Weber JE, Bielak LF, Peyser PA, Chinnaiyan KM (2011) Development and validation of a predictive screening tool for uninterpretable coronary CT angiography results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:490–497PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Pasricha SS, Nandurkar D, Seneviratne SK et al (2009) Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 193:1514–1521CrossRef Pasricha SS, Nandurkar D, Seneviratne SK et al (2009) Image quality of coronary 320-MDCT in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Am J Roentgenol 193:1514–1521CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef Meijboom WB, Mollet NR, Van Mieghem CA et al (2007) 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 50:1469–1475PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: Diagnostic accuracy of 320-row computed tomography as compared with invasive coronary angiography in unselected, consecutive patients with suspected coronary artery disease
Authors
F. Pelliccia
V. Pasceri
A. Evangelista
A. Pergolini
F. Barillà
N. Viceconte
G. Tanzilli
M. Schiariti
C. Greco
C. Gaudio
Publication date
01-02-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1569-5794
Electronic ISSN: 1875-8312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0095-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 2/2013 Go to the issue