Published in:
Open Access
01-04-2011 | Editorial Comment
100 kV versus 120 kV: effective reduction in radiation dose?
Authors:
E. E. van der Wall, J. W. Jukema, J. D. Schuijf, J. J. Bax
Published in:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
|
Issue 4/2011
Login to get access
Excerpt
Over the past few years, computed tomography (CT) angiography has emerged as a reliable non-invasive method for the assessment of coronary anatomy and cardiac function [
1‐
17]. Multiple studies involving over several thousands of patients have established that CT angiography is highly accurate for delineation of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis [
18‐
35]. With its high negative predictive value cardiac CT is optimally suited for the evaluation of patients with a low or intermediate risk of coronary disease, allowing the non-invasive exclusion of coronary disease at relatively low cost and risk [
36‐
48]. However, the appropriate radiation dose remains an important issue in cardiac CT. On one hand, a too low radiation dose may result in a high level of image noise and therefore in non-evaluable images. On the other hand, using higher radiation exposure levels may put patients at unnecessary risk of radiation damage [
49‐
57]. …