Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Original paper

Demographic, presentation, and treatment factors and racial disparities in ovarian cancer hospitalization outcomes

Authors: Tomi F. Akinyemiju, Gurudatta Naik, Kemi Ogunsina, Daniel T. Dibaba, Neomi Vin-Raviv

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study examines whether racial disparities in hospitalization outcomes persist between African–American and White women with ovarian cancer after matching on demographic, presentation, and treatment factors.

Methods

Using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, 5,164 African–American ovarian cancer patients were sequentially matched with White patients on demographic (e.g., age, income), presentation (e.g., stage, comorbidities), and treatment (e.g., surgery, radiation) factors. Racial differences in-hospital length of stay, post-operative complications, and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using conditional logistic regression models.

Results

White ovarian cancer patients had relatively higher odds of post-operative complications when matched on demographics (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.05, 1.74), and presentation (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.00, 1.65) but not when additionally matched on treatment (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.78, 1.35). African–American patients had longer in-hospital length of stay (6.96 ± 7.21 days) compared with White patients when matched on demographics (6.37 ± 7.07 days), presentation (6.48 ± 7.16 days), and treatment (6.53 ± 7.59 days). Compared with African–American patients, White patients experienced lower odds of in-hospital mortality when matched on demographics (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66, 0.92), but this disparity was no longer significant when additionally matched on presentation (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.75, 1.04) and treatment (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.81, 1.12).

Conclusion

Racial disparities in ovarian cancer hospitalization outcomes persisted after adjusting for demographic and presentation factors; however these differences were eliminated after additionally accounting for treatment factors. More studies are needed to determine the factors driving racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in otherwise similar patient populations.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:1:7–30CrossRef Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2016) Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin 66:1:7–30CrossRef
12.
go back to reference National Cancer Institute (2015) Seer stat fact sheets: ovary cancer. http://Seer.Cancer.Gov/Statfacts/Html/Ovary.Html National Cancer Institute (2015) Seer stat fact sheets: ovary cancer. http://​Seer.​Cancer.​Gov/​Statfacts/​Html/​Ovary.​Html
13.
go back to reference Peterson C, Rauscher G, Johnson T, Kirschner C, Barrett R, Kim S et al (2014) The association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and ovarian cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Causes Control 25(5):633–637CrossRef Peterson C, Rauscher G, Johnson T, Kirschner C, Barrett R, Kim S et al (2014) The association between neighborhood socioeconomic status and ovarian cancer tumor characteristics. Cancer Causes Control 25(5):633–637CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parham G, Phillips JL, Hicks ML, Andrews N, Jones WB, Shingleton HM et al (1997) The national cancer data base report on malignant epithelial ovarian carcinoma in African-American Women. Cancer 80:816–826CrossRef Parham G, Phillips JL, Hicks ML, Andrews N, Jones WB, Shingleton HM et al (1997) The national cancer data base report on malignant epithelial ovarian carcinoma in African-American Women. Cancer 80:816–826CrossRef
25.
go back to reference AHRQ (Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality) R M. Hcup Databases, Healthcare Cost And Utilization Project (Hcup). February 6,2017 Ed: Ahrq (Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality), 2011 AHRQ (Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality) R M. Hcup Databases, Healthcare Cost And Utilization Project (Hcup). February 6,2017 Ed: Ahrq (Agency For Healthcare Research And Quality), 2011
26.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-Cm administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-Cm administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Clark AS, Giantonio BJ, Ross RN, Teng Y et al (2013) Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer. JAMA 310(4):389–397CrossRef Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Clark AS, Giantonio BJ, Ross RN, Teng Y et al (2013) Characteristics associated with differences in survival among black and white women with breast cancer. JAMA 310(4):389–397CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Elit L, Charles C, Gold I et al (2003) Women’s perceptions about treatment decision making for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88(2):89–95CrossRef Elit L, Charles C, Gold I et al (2003) Women’s perceptions about treatment decision making for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 88(2):89–95CrossRef
34.
go back to reference John EM, Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J (1993) Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of seven U.S.case–control studies. Epithelial ovarian cancer in black women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(2):142–147CrossRef John EM, Whittemore AS, Harris R, Itnyre J (1993) Characteristics relating to ovarian cancer risk: collaborative analysis of seven U.S.case–control studies. Epithelial ovarian cancer in black women. Collaborative Ovarian Cancer Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(2):142–147CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Halpern MT et al (2008) Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 63(6):380–381CrossRef Halpern MT et al (2008) Association of insurance status and ethnicity with cancer stage at diagnosis for 12 cancer sites: a retrospective analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 63(6):380–381CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Murphy CC et al (2015) Race and insurance differences in the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(23):2530–2536CrossRef Murphy CC et al (2015) Race and insurance differences in the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among patients with stage III colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(23):2530–2536CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Hoehn RS et al (2015) Does race affect management and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma in the United. States? Surgery 158(5):1244–1251CrossRef Hoehn RS et al (2015) Does race affect management and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma in the United. States? Surgery 158(5):1244–1251CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Fedewa SA et al (2011) Insurance status and racial differences in uterine cancer survival: a study of patients in the national cancer database. Gynecol Oncol 122(1):63–68CrossRef Fedewa SA et al (2011) Insurance status and racial differences in uterine cancer survival: a study of patients in the national cancer database. Gynecol Oncol 122(1):63–68CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Costa LJ, Brill IK, Brown EE (2016) Impact of marital status, insurance status, income, and race/ethnicity on the survival of younger patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in the United States. Cancer 122(20):3183–3190CrossRef Costa LJ, Brill IK, Brown EE (2016) Impact of marital status, insurance status, income, and race/ethnicity on the survival of younger patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in the United States. Cancer 122(20):3183–3190CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cholankeril G et al (2016) Skilled nursing facility placement in hospitalized elderly patients with colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(11):1660–1666CrossRef Cholankeril G et al (2016) Skilled nursing facility placement in hospitalized elderly patients with colon cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(11):1660–1666CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Alhilli MM et al (2013) Risk-scoring model for prediction of non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 217(3):507–515CrossRef Alhilli MM et al (2013) Risk-scoring model for prediction of non-home discharge in epithelial ovarian cancer patients. J Am Coll Surg 217(3):507–515CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Balentine CJ et al (2014) Association of high-volume hospitals with greater likelihood of discharge to home following colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg 149(3):244CrossRef Balentine CJ et al (2014) Association of high-volume hospitals with greater likelihood of discharge to home following colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg 149(3):244CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Joynt KE (2014) Disparities in surgical 30-day readmission rates for medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. Ann Surg 259(6):1086–1090CrossRef Tsai TC, Orav EJ, Joynt KE (2014) Disparities in surgical 30-day readmission rates for medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. Ann Surg 259(6):1086–1090CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Demographic, presentation, and treatment factors and racial disparities in ovarian cancer hospitalization outcomes
Authors
Tomi F. Akinyemiju
Gurudatta Naik
Kemi Ogunsina
Daniel T. Dibaba
Neomi Vin-Raviv
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1010-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Cancer Causes & Control 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine