Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 3/2018

Open Access 01-03-2018 | Brief report

Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer

Authors: Rebecca Gilbert, Kate Tilling, Richard M. Martin, J. Athene Lane, Michael Davis, Freddie C. Hamdy, David E. Neal, Jenny L. Donovan, Chris Metcalfe

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To examine whether age-related reference ranges for “normal” prostate-specific antigen (PSA) change (determined in men without prostate cancer) can be used to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer.

Methods

Subjects were men aged 50–69 years with PSA < 10 ng/mL from the UK-based Prostate Testing for cancer and Treatment (ProtecT) study. Men with prostate cancer were categorized as high or low risk of progression (Low risk: Gleason score ≤ 6 and stage T1–T2a; High risk: Gleason score 7–10 or stage T2C). Men without prostate cancer were those with no histological confirmation of prostate cancer. Previously developed longitudinal reference ranges for normal age-related PSA change were used to calculate an age-specific PSA threshold. We compared the ability of our age-specific PSA threshold to discriminate between high- and no/low-risk prostate cancer with that of two existing thresholds: (i) threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages; (ii) National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines dependent on age-group thresholds (age 50–59: PSA = 3 ng/mL; age 60–70: PSA = 4 ng/mL; age ≥ 70: PSA = 5 ng/mL).

Results

We included 823 men with high-risk prostate cancer and 80,721 men with no/low-risk prostate cancer. A threshold of PSA = 3 ng/ml for all ages identified more high-risk prostate cancers, recommending biopsy in 9.8% of men, of which 10.3% (n = 823) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the NICE guidelines as the threshold for biopsy, 6.9% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 11.9% (n = 668) had high-risk prostate cancer. Using the new age-specific threshold for biopsy, 2.3% men were recommended for biopsy, of which 15.2% (n = 290) had high-risk prostate cancer. The age-specific threshold identified fewer high-risk prostate cancers, but fewer men received unnecessary biopsy.

Conclusion

There is no benefit to using reference ranges for “normal” PSA that change with age nor the age-specific thresholds suggested by the NICE guidelines. While the age-varying thresholds are more discriminatory, too many high-risk cancers are missed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cancer Research UK (2014) CancerStats report prostate cancer: UK, Cancer Research UK Cancer Research UK (2014) CancerStats report prostate cancer: UK, Cancer Research UK
2.
go back to reference Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E et al. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1425–1437 Donovan JL, Hamdy FC, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Walsh E et al. Patient-reported outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1425–1437
3.
go back to reference Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1415–1424CrossRef Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, Mason M, Metcalfe C, Holding P et al (2016) 10-year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 375(15):1415–1424CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS et al (2006) Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. JNCI 98(8):529–534CrossRef Thompson IM, Ankerst DP, Chi C, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Lucia MS et al (2006) Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial. JNCI 98(8):529–534CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Oesterling JE (1996) Age-specific reference ranges for serum PSA. N Engl J Med 335(5):345-CrossRef Oesterling JE (1996) Age-specific reference ranges for serum PSA. N Engl J Med 335(5):345-CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lane JA, Donovan JL, Davis M, Walsh E, Down L, Turner EL et al (2014) Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(10):1109–1118CrossRef Lane JA, Donovan JL, Davis M, Walsh E, Down L, Turner EL et al (2014) Active monitoring, radical prostatectomy, or radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer: study design and diagnostic and baseline results of the ProtecT randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15(10):1109–1118CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1994) The new American joint committee on cancer and international union against cancer TNM classification of prostate cancer. Cancer 74(1):104–114CrossRef Ohori M, Wheeler TM, Scardino PT (1994) The new American joint committee on cancer and international union against cancer TNM classification of prostate cancer. Cancer 74(1):104–114CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bosch JLHR., Tilling K, Bohnen AM, Donovan JL (2006) Establishing normal reference ranges for PSA change with age in a population-based study: the Krimpen study. Prostate 66(4):335–343CrossRef Bosch JLHR., Tilling K, Bohnen AM, Donovan JL (2006) Establishing normal reference ranges for PSA change with age in a population-based study: the Krimpen study. Prostate 66(4):335–343CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Luboldt H-J, Schindler JF, Rübben H (2007) Age-specific reference ranges for prostate-specific antigen as a marker for prostate cancer. EAU-EBU Update Series 5(1):38–48CrossRef Luboldt H-J, Schindler JF, Rübben H (2007) Age-specific reference ranges for prostate-specific antigen as a marker for prostate cancer. EAU-EBU Update Series 5(1):38–48CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Heidegger I, Fritz J, Klocker H, Pichler R, Bektic J, Horninger W (2015) Age-adjusted PSA levels in prostate cancer prediction: updated results of the tyrol prostate cancer early detection program. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0134134CrossRef Heidegger I, Fritz J, Klocker H, Pichler R, Bektic J, Horninger W (2015) Age-adjusted PSA levels in prostate cancer prediction: updated results of the tyrol prostate cancer early detection program. PLoS ONE 10(7):e0134134CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Harrison S, Tilling K, Turner E, Lane A, Simpkin A, Davis M et al (2016) Investigating the prostate specific antigen, body mass index and age relationship. Cancer Causes Control 27(12):1465–1474CrossRef Harrison S, Tilling K, Turner E, Lane A, Simpkin A, Davis M et al (2016) Investigating the prostate specific antigen, body mass index and age relationship. Cancer Causes Control 27(12):1465–1474CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Developing new age-specific prostate-specific antigen thresholds for testing for prostate cancer
Authors
Rebecca Gilbert
Kate Tilling
Richard M. Martin
J. Athene Lane
Michael Davis
Freddie C. Hamdy
David E. Neal
Jenny L. Donovan
Chris Metcalfe
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-018-1014-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Cancer Causes & Control 3/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine