Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 11/2014

01-11-2014 | Original paper

Postoperative 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: development of a prognostic model using administrative claims data

Authors: S. de Vries, D. B. Jeffe, N. O. Davidson, A. D. Deshpande, M. Schootman

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 11/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a prognostic model to predict 30-day mortality following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare-linked data and to assess whether race/ethnicity, neighborhood, and hospital characteristics influence model performance.

Methods

We included patients aged 66 years and older from the linked 2000–2005 SEER-Medicare database. Outcome included 30-day mortality, both in-hospital and following discharge. Potential prognostic factors included tumor, treatment, sociodemographic, hospital, and neighborhood characteristics (census-tract-poverty rate). We performed a multilevel logistic regression analysis to account for nesting of CRC patients within hospitals. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discrimination and the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test for calibration.

Results

In a model that included all prognostic factors, important predictors of 30-day mortality included age at diagnosis, cancer stage, and mode of presentation. Race/ethnicity, census-tract-poverty rate, and hospital characteristics were independently associated with 30-day mortality, but they did not influence model performance. Our SEER-Medicare model achieved moderate discrimination (AUC = 0.76), despite suboptimal calibration.

Conclusions

We developed a prognostic model that included tumor, treatment, sociodemographic, hospital, and neighborhood predictors. Race/ethnicity, neighborhood, and hospital characteristics did not improve model performance compared with previously developed models.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA et al (2007) Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg 142:23–31PubMedCrossRef Billingsley KG, Morris AM, Dominitz JA et al (2007) Surgeon and hospital characteristics as predictors of major adverse outcomes following colon cancer surgery: understanding the volume-outcome relationship. Arch Surg 142:23–31PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jorgensen P (2007) Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 9:28–37PubMedCrossRef Iversen LH, Harling H, Laurberg S, Wille-Jorgensen P (2007) Influence of caseload and surgical speciality on outcome following surgery for colorectal cancer: a review of evidence. Part 1: short-term outcome. Colorectal Dis 9:28–37PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rosen L, Stasik JJ Jr, Reed JF 3rd, Olenwine JA, Aronoff JS, Sherman D (1996) Variations in colon and rectal surgical mortality. Comparison of specialties with a state-legislated database. Dis Colon Rectum 39:129–135PubMedCrossRef Rosen L, Stasik JJ Jr, Reed JF 3rd, Olenwine JA, Aronoff JS, Sherman D (1996) Variations in colon and rectal surgical mortality. Comparison of specialties with a state-legislated database. Dis Colon Rectum 39:129–135PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Taylor BA, Copeland GP (1996) Comparison of individual surgeon’s performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system. Dis Colon Rectum 39:654–658PubMedCrossRef Sagar PM, Hartley MN, MacFie J, Taylor BA, Copeland GP (1996) Comparison of individual surgeon’s performance. Risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring system. Dis Colon Rectum 39:654–658PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman PC, May J, Macfie J (1994) Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 81:1492–1494PubMedCrossRef Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Mancey-Jones B, Sedman PC, May J, Macfie J (1994) Comparative audit of colorectal resection with the POSSUM scoring system. Br J Surg 81:1492–1494PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360PubMedCrossRef Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M (1991) POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg 78:355–360PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef Prytherch DR, Whiteley MS, Higgins B, Weaver PC, Prout WG, Powell SJ (1998) POSSUM and Portsmouth POSSUM for predicting mortality. Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity. Br J Surg 85:1217–1220PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM et al (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91:1174–1182PubMedCrossRef Tekkis PP, Prytherch DR, Kocher HM et al (2004) Development of a dedicated risk-adjustment scoring system for colorectal surgery (colorectal POSSUM). Br J Surg 91:1174–1182PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC (2004) Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2015–2024PubMedCrossRef Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC (2004) Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2015–2024PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Richards CH, Leitch FE, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2010) A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1511–1520PubMedCrossRef Richards CH, Leitch FE, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2010) A systematic review of POSSUM and its related models as predictors of post-operative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1511–1520PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2004) POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1435–1441PubMedCrossRef Senagore AJ, Warmuth AJ, Delaney CP, Tekkis PP, Fazio VW (2004) POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1435–1441PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Al-Homoud S, Purkayastha S, Aziz O et al (2004) Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models. Surg Oncol 13:83–92PubMedCrossRef Al-Homoud S, Purkayastha S, Aziz O et al (2004) Evaluating operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: ASA and POSSUM-based predictive models. Surg Oncol 13:83–92PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Teeuwen PH, Bremers AJ, Groenewoud JM, van Laarhoven CJ, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Predictive value of POSSUM and ACPGBI scoring in mortality and morbidity of colorectal resection: a case–control study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:294–303PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Teeuwen PH, Bremers AJ, Groenewoud JM, van Laarhoven CJ, Bleichrodt RP (2011) Predictive value of POSSUM and ACPGBI scoring in mortality and morbidity of colorectal resection: a case–control study. J Gastrointest Surg 15:294–303PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Ferjani AM, Griffin D, Stallard N, Wong LS (2007) A newly devised scoring system for prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:317–322PubMedCrossRef Ferjani AM, Griffin D, Stallard N, Wong LS (2007) A newly devised scoring system for prediction of mortality in patients with colorectal cancer: a prospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:317–322PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fichera A (2005) How accurate is the Cleveland Clinic Foundation model in predicting operative risk in colorectal cancer patients? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2:258–259PubMedCrossRef Fichera A (2005) How accurate is the Cleveland Clinic Foundation model in predicting operative risk in colorectal cancer patients? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2:258–259PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Schneider EB, Haider AH, Hyder O, Efron JE, Lidor AO, Pawlik TM (2013) Assessing short- and long-term outcomes among black vs white Medicare patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 205:402–408 Schneider EB, Haider AH, Hyder O, Efron JE, Lidor AO, Pawlik TM (2013) Assessing short- and long-term outcomes among black vs white Medicare patients undergoing resection of colorectal cancer. Am J Surg 205:402–408
19.
go back to reference Bharathan B, Welfare M, Borowski DW et al (2011) Impact of deprivation on short- and long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 98:854–865PubMedCrossRef Bharathan B, Welfare M, Borowski DW et al (2011) Impact of deprivation on short- and long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 98:854–865PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL et al (2014) Hospital and geographic variability in thirty-day all-cause mortality following colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res 49:1145–1164 Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL et al (2014) Hospital and geographic variability in thirty-day all-cause mortality following colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res 49:1145–1164
22.
go back to reference Alvarez C, Clark C, Zhang S et al (2013) Predicting out of intensive care unit cardiopulmonary arrest or death using electronic medical record data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:28PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Alvarez C, Clark C, Zhang S et al (2013) Predicting out of intensive care unit cardiopulmonary arrest or death using electronic medical record data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:28PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-3–IV-18 Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF (2002) Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-3–IV-18
24.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Virnig B, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J, Warren JL (2002) Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-43–IV-48CrossRef Cooper GS, Virnig B, Klabunde CN, Schussler N, Freeman J, Warren JL (2002) Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery. Med Care 40(8 Suppl):IV-43–IV-48CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 3:Cd005391 Archampong D, Borowski D, Wille-Jorgensen P, Iversen LH (2012) Workload and surgeon’s specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery. Cochrane Database of Syst Rev 3:Cd005391
26.
go back to reference Chien LC, Schootman M, Pruitt SL (2013) The modifying effect of patient location on stage-specific survival following colorectal cancer using geosurvival models. Cancer Causes Control 24:473–484PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Chien LC, Schootman M, Pruitt SL (2013) The modifying effect of patient location on stage-specific survival following colorectal cancer using geosurvival models. Cancer Causes Control 24:473–484PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Kolfschoten NE, Marang van de Mheen PJ, Gooiker GA et al (2011) Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:956–963PubMedCrossRef Kolfschoten NE, Marang van de Mheen PJ, Gooiker GA et al (2011) Variation in case-mix between hospitals treating colorectal cancer patients in the Netherlands. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:956–963PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Morris EJ, Taylor EF, Thomas JD et al (2011) Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut 60:806–813PubMedCrossRef Morris EJ, Taylor EF, Thomas JD et al (2011) Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut 60:806–813PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL (2000) Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1258–1267PubMedCrossRef Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL (2000) Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 53:1258–1267PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b604PubMedCrossRef Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y (2009) Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 338:b604PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. Springer, New YorkCrossRef Steyerberg EW (2009) Clinical prediction models: a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. Springer, New YorkCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Steyerberg EW, Neville BA, Koppert LB et al (2006) Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol 24:4277–4284PubMedCrossRef Steyerberg EW, Neville BA, Koppert LB et al (2006) Surgical mortality in patients with esophageal cancer: development and validation of a simple risk score. J Clin Oncol 24:4277–4284PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16:965–980PubMedCrossRef Hosmer DW, Hosmer T, Le Cessie S, Lemeshow S (1997) A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for the logistic regression model. Stat Med 16:965–980PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB (1996) Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Pencina KM, Janssens AC, Greenland P (2012) Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models. Am J Epidemiol 176:473–481PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Pencina KM, Janssens AC, Greenland P (2012) Interpreting incremental value of markers added to risk prediction models. Am J Epidemiol 176:473–481PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Smulders YM, Thijs A, Twisk JW (2008) New cardiovascular risk determinants do exist and are clinically useful. Eur Heart J 29:436–440PubMedCrossRef Smulders YM, Thijs A, Twisk JW (2008) New cardiovascular risk determinants do exist and are clinically useful. Eur Heart J 29:436–440PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Dogrul AB, Kilic YA, Celebi AE et al (2010) External validation of Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model in a University Clinic in terms of predicting operative mortality. Tech Coloproctol 14:9–12PubMedCrossRef Dogrul AB, Kilic YA, Celebi AE et al (2010) External validation of Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model in a University Clinic in terms of predicting operative mortality. Tech Coloproctol 14:9–12PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Tabak YP, Sun X, Johannes RS, Hyde L, Shorr AF, Lindenauer PK (2013) Development and validation of a mortality risk-adjustment model for patients hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Care 51:597–605 Tabak YP, Sun X, Johannes RS, Hyde L, Shorr AF, Lindenauer PK (2013) Development and validation of a mortality risk-adjustment model for patients hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Care 51:597–605
39.
go back to reference Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1980) Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 9:1043–1069CrossRef Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1980) Goodness of fit tests for the multiple logistic regression model. Commun Stat Theory Methods 9:1043–1069CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Dekker JW, Gooiker GA, van der Geest LG et al (2012) Use of different comorbidity scores for risk-adjustment in the evaluation of quality of colorectal cancer surgery: does it matter? Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1071–1078PubMedCrossRef Dekker JW, Gooiker GA, van der Geest LG et al (2012) Use of different comorbidity scores for risk-adjustment in the evaluation of quality of colorectal cancer surgery: does it matter? Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1071–1078PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Ash AS, Fienberg SE, Louis TA, Normand SL, Stukel TA, Utts J (2011) Statistical issues on assessing hospital performance. The COPSS-CMS White Paper Committee Ash AS, Fienberg SE, Louis TA, Normand SL, Stukel TA, Utts J (2011) Statistical issues on assessing hospital performance. The COPSS-CMS White Paper Committee
Metadata
Title
Postoperative 30-day mortality in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: development of a prognostic model using administrative claims data
Authors
S. de Vries
D. B. Jeffe
N. O. Davidson
A. D. Deshpande
M. Schootman
Publication date
01-11-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 11/2014
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-014-0451-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2014

Cancer Causes & Control 11/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine