Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2004

01-12-2004 | Original Contributions

Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model

Authors: Victor W. Fazio, M.B., M.S., Paris P. Tekkis, F.R.C.S., Feza Remzi, M.D., Ian C. Lavery, M.B.B.S.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 12/2004

Login to get access

INTRODUCTION

Predictive models play a pivotal role in the provision of risk-adjusted, operative mortality rates. The purpose of the study was to describe the development of a dedicated prognostic index for quantifying operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected from 5,034 consecutive patients undergoing major surgery in a single center from October 1976 to July 2002. Primary end point was 30-day operative mortality. A multilevel Bayesian logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and accommodate the variability of outcomes between surgeons. The model was internally validated (split-sample) and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis.

RESULTS

The patients’ median age was 66 (range, 18–98) years. Operative mortality was 2.3 percent with no significant variability between surgeons or through time. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio = 1.5 per 10-year increase), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade (odds ratio for ASA II, III, IV–V vs. I = 2.6, 4.3, 6.8), TNM staging (odds ratio for Stage IV vs. I–III = 2.6), mode of surgery (odds ratio for urgent vs. nonurgent = 2.1) no-cancer resection vs. cancer resection (odds ratio = 4.5), and hematocrit level. The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.801) and excellent agreement between observed and model-predicted outcomes over ten major colorectal procedures (P = 0.191).

CONCLUSIONS

The colorectal cancer model provided an accurate means of estimating risk for individual patients in the preoperative setting. It has important implications in everyday practice, because it may be used as an adjunct in the process of informed consent and for monitoring surgical performance through time.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter, DJ, Aylin, P, Best, NG, Evans, SJ, Murray, GD 2002Commissioned analysis of surgical performance by using routine data: lessons from Bristol inquiryJ R Stat Soc A165131 Spiegelhalter, DJ, Aylin, P, Best, NG, Evans, SJ, Murray, GD 2002Commissioned analysis of surgical performance by using routine data: lessons from Bristol inquiryJ R Stat Soc A165131
2.
go back to reference Hadorn DC, Keeler EB, Rogers WH, Brook RH. Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models: RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research; 1993. Hadorn DC, Keeler EB, Rogers WH, Brook RH. Assessing the performance of mortality prediction models: RAND/UCLA/Harvard Center for Health Care Financing Policy Research; 1993.
3.
go back to reference Copeland, GP, Jones, D, Walters, M 1991POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical auditBr J Surg7835560PubMed Copeland, GP, Jones, D, Walters, M 1991POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical auditBr J Surg7835560PubMed
4.
go back to reference Whiteley, MS, Prytherch, DR, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1996An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring systemBr J Surg838125PubMed Whiteley, MS, Prytherch, DR, Higgins, B, Weaver, PC, Prout, WG 1996An evaluation of the POSSUM surgical scoring systemBr J Surg838125PubMed
5.
go back to reference Knaus, WA, Wagner, DP, Draper, EA, et al. 1991The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalised adultsChest100161936PubMed Knaus, WA, Wagner, DP, Draper, EA,  et al. 1991The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalised adultsChest100161936PubMed
6.
go back to reference Khuri, SF, Najjar, SF, Daley, J, et al. 2001Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans AffairsAnn Surg23437082CrossRefPubMed Khuri, SF, Najjar, SF, Daley, J,  et al. 2001Comparison of surgical outcomes between teaching and non-teaching hospitals in the Department of Veterans AffairsAnn Surg23437082CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Khuri, SF, Daley, J, Henderson, W, et al. 1997Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk StudyJ Am Coll Surg18531527CrossRefPubMed Khuri, SF, Daley, J, Henderson, W,  et al. 1997Risk adjustment of the postoperative mortality rate for the comparative assessment of the quality of surgical care: results of the National Veterans Affairs Surgical Risk StudyJ Am Coll Surg18531527CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tekkis, PP, Kessaris, N, Kocher, HM, Poloniecki, JD, Lyttle, J, Windsor, A 2003Evaluation of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgeryBr J Surg903405PubMed Tekkis, PP, Kessaris, N, Kocher, HM, Poloniecki, JD, Lyttle, J, Windsor, A 2003Evaluation of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in patients undergoing colorectal surgeryBr J Surg903405PubMed
9.
go back to reference Hospital Episode Statistics. Main operations 2000/01, Department of Health. Available at: http://www.doh.gov.uk/hes/free_data/index.html. Hospital Episode Statistics. Main operations 2000/01, Department of Health. Available at: http://​www.​doh.​gov.​uk/​hes/​free_​data/​index.​html.​
10.
go back to reference Harrell, FE, Lee, KL, Mark, DB 1996Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errorsStat Med1536187CrossRefPubMed Harrell, FE, Lee, KL, Mark, DB 1996Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errorsStat Med1536187CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. eds. A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: University of London, 2001. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. eds. A user’s guide to MLwiN. London: University of London, 2001.
12.
go back to reference Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S 2000Applied logistic regression2nd edJohn Wiley & SonsNew York Hosmer, DW, Lemeshow, S 2000Applied logistic regression2nd edJohn Wiley & SonsNew York
13.
go back to reference Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ 1982The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1432936PubMed Hanley, JA, McNeil, BJ 1982The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curveRadiology1432936PubMed
14.
go back to reference Birkmemeyer, JD, Siewers, AE, Finlayson, EV, et al. 2002Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United StatesN Engl J Med346112837CrossRefPubMed Birkmemeyer, JD, Siewers, AE, Finlayson, EV,  et al. 2002Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United StatesN Engl J Med346112837CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Aitkin, M, Longford, N 1986Statistical modelling in school effectiveness studiesJ R Stat Soc A149143CrossRef Aitkin, M, Longford, N 1986Statistical modelling in school effectiveness studiesJ R Stat Soc A149143CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goldstein, H, Thomas, S 1996Using examination results as indicators of school and college performanceJ R Stat Soc A15914963 Goldstein, H, Thomas, S 1996Using examination results as indicators of school and college performanceJ R Stat Soc A15914963
17.
go back to reference Goldstein, H, Spiegelhalter, D 1996League tables and their limitationsJ R Stat Soc A15950513 Goldstein, H, Spiegelhalter, D 1996League tables and their limitationsJ R Stat Soc A15950513
18.
go back to reference Marshall, EC, Spiegelhalter, DJ 1998Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth ratesBMJ31617014PubMed Marshall, EC, Spiegelhalter, DJ 1998Reliability of league tables of in vitro fertilisation clinics: retrospective analysis of live birth ratesBMJ31617014PubMed
19.
go back to reference Leyland AH, McLeod A. Mortality in England and Wales, 1979–1992. An introduction to multilevel modelling using MLwiN: MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit. Occasional Paper No 1; 2000. Leyland AH, McLeod A. Mortality in England and Wales, 1979–1992. An introduction to multilevel modelling using MLwiN: MRC Social & Public Health Sciences Unit. Occasional Paper No 1; 2000.
20.
go back to reference Holme, T, Johansson, H, Cedermark, B, Ekelund, G, Rutqvist, LE 1997Influence of hospital and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapyBr J Surg8465763CrossRefPubMed Holme, T, Johansson, H, Cedermark, B, Ekelund, G, Rutqvist, LE 1997Influence of hospital and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapyBr J Surg8465763CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Irvin, TT 1988Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderlyBr J Surg7541921PubMed Irvin, TT 1988Prognosis of colorectal cancer in the elderlyBr J Surg7541921PubMed
22.
go back to reference Hosking, MP, Warner, MA, Lobdell, CM, Offord, KP, Melton, LJ 1989Outcomes of surgery in patients 90 years of age and olderJAMA261190915PubMed Hosking, MP, Warner, MA, Lobdell, CM, Offord, KP, Melton, LJ 1989Outcomes of surgery in patients 90 years of age and olderJAMA261190915PubMed
23.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group2000Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic reviewLancet35696874 Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group2000Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic reviewLancet35696874
24.
go back to reference Stamatakis, JD, Aitken, J, Smith, J, Thompson, MR (2001) “What can we learn from colorectal cancer audits?” In: Taylor, I, Johnson, C (eds.), Recent advances in surgery 24, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh Stamatakis, JD, Aitken, J, Smith, J, Thompson, MR (2001) “What can we learn from colorectal cancer audits?” In: Taylor, I, Johnson, C (eds.), Recent advances in surgery 24, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh
25.
go back to reference Stamatakis, JD, Thompson, MR, Chave, H, Kinsman, R 1998National audit of bowel obstruction due to colorectal cancer April 1998 – March 1999The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and IrelandLondon Stamatakis, JD, Thompson, MR, Chave, H, Kinsman, R 1998National audit of bowel obstruction due to colorectal cancer April 1998 – March 1999The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and IrelandLondon
26.
go back to reference Iezzoni, LI 1997Risk adjustment for measuring healthcare outcomesHealth Administration PressAnn Arbor Iezzoni, LI 1997Risk adjustment for measuring healthcare outcomesHealth Administration PressAnn Arbor
27.
go back to reference Khuri, SF, Daley, J, Henderson, W, et al. 1998The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical careNational VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg228491507 Khuri, SF, Daley, J, Henderson, W,  et al. 1998The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical careNational VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg228491507
28.
go back to reference Copeland, GP 1992Surgical scoring, risk assessment and the surgeonJ R Coll Surg Edinb371458PubMed Copeland, GP 1992Surgical scoring, risk assessment and the surgeonJ R Coll Surg Edinb371458PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sagar, PM, Hartley, MN, MacFie, J, Taylor, BA, Copeland, GP 1996Comparison of individual surgeon’s performance: risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring systemDis Colon Rectum396548PubMed Sagar, PM, Hartley, MN, MacFie, J, Taylor, BA, Copeland, GP 1996Comparison of individual surgeon’s performance: risk-adjusted analysis with POSSUM scoring systemDis Colon Rectum396548PubMed
30.
go back to reference Tekkis, PP, Kocher, HM, Bentley, AJ, et al. 2000Operative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgeryDis Colon Rectum43152834PubMed Tekkis, PP, Kocher, HM, Bentley, AJ,  et al. 2000Operative mortality rates among surgeons: comparison of POSSUM and p-POSSUM scoring systems in gastrointestinal surgeryDis Colon Rectum43152834PubMed
31.
32.
go back to reference Tekkis, PP, Poloniecki, JD, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2003Risk-adjusted post-operative mortality in colorectal cancerBMJ3271196201CrossRefPubMed Tekkis, PP, Poloniecki, JD, Thompson, MR, Stamatakis, JD 2003Risk-adjusted post-operative mortality in colorectal cancerBMJ3271196201CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Prytherch, DR, Beard, JD, Ridler, BF, Earnshaw, JJ 2000Vascular Surgical Society operative outcome study: preoperative physiology predicts outcomeBr J Surg875078CrossRef Prytherch, DR, Beard, JD, Ridler, BF, Earnshaw, JJ 2000Vascular Surgical Society operative outcome study: preoperative physiology predicts outcomeBr J Surg875078CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Fletcher, RD, Dayhoff, RE, Wu, CM, Graves, A, Jones, RE 2001Computerised medical records in the Department of Veterans AffairsCancer9116036CrossRefPubMed Fletcher, RD, Dayhoff, RE, Wu, CM, Graves, A, Jones, RE 2001Computerised medical records in the Department of Veterans AffairsCancer9116036CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of Operative Risk in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The Cleveland Clinic Foundation Colorectal Cancer Model
Authors
Victor W. Fazio, M.B., M.S.
Paris P. Tekkis, F.R.C.S.
Feza Remzi, M.D.
Ian C. Lavery, M.B.B.S.
Publication date
01-12-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 12/2004
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0704-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2004

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 12/2004 Go to the issue