Skip to main content
Top
Literature
1.
go back to reference Checkoway H, Boffetta P, Mundt DJ, Mundt KA (2012) Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. doi:10.1007/s10552-012-0055-2 Checkoway H, Boffetta P, Mundt DJ, Mundt KA (2012) Critical review and synthesis of the epidemiologic evidence on formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and other lymphohematopoietic malignancies. Cancer Causes Control. doi:10.​1007/​s10552-012-0055-2
2.
go back to reference Zhang L, Tang X, Rothman N, Vermeulen R, Ji Z, Shen M, Qiu C, Guo W, Liu S, Reiss B et al (2010) Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity, and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(1):80–88CrossRef Zhang L, Tang X, Rothman N, Vermeulen R, Ji Z, Shen M, Qiu C, Guo W, Liu S, Reiss B et al (2010) Occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity, and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(1):80–88CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Speit G, Gelbke H-P, Pallapies D, Morfeld P (2010) Letter to the editor: occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:1882–1884, (author response 1884–1885) Speit G, Gelbke H-P, Pallapies D, Morfeld P (2010) Letter to the editor: occupational exposure to formaldehyde, hematotoxicity and leukemia-specific chromosome changes in cultured myeloid progenitor cells. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19:1882–1884, (author response 1884–1885)
5.
go back to reference Schwilk E, Zhang L, Smith MT, Smith AH, Steinmaus C (2010) Formaldehyde and leukemia: an updated meta-analysis and evaluation of bias. J Occup Environ Med 52(9):878–886PubMedCrossRef Schwilk E, Zhang L, Smith MT, Smith AH, Steinmaus C (2010) Formaldehyde and leukemia: an updated meta-analysis and evaluation of bias. J Occup Environ Med 52(9):878–886PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhang L, Steinmaus C, Eastmond DA, Xin XK, Smith MT (2009) Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: a new meta-analysis and potential mechanisms. Mutat Res 681(2–3):150–168PubMed Zhang L, Steinmaus C, Eastmond DA, Xin XK, Smith MT (2009) Formaldehyde exposure and leukemia: a new meta-analysis and potential mechanisms. Mutat Res 681(2–3):150–168PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bachand AM, Mundt KA, Mundt DJ, Montgomery RR (2010) Epidemiological studies of formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and nasopharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Toxicol 40(2):85–100PubMedCrossRef Bachand AM, Mundt KA, Mundt DJ, Montgomery RR (2010) Epidemiological studies of formaldehyde exposure and risk of leukemia and nasopharyngeal cancer: a meta-analysis. Crit Rev Toxicol 40(2):85–100PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Greenland S, Longnecker MP (1992) Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 135(11):1301–1309PubMed Greenland S, Longnecker MP (1992) Methods for trend estimation from summarized dose-response data, with applications to meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol 135(11):1301–1309PubMed
9.
go back to reference Orsini N, Li R, Wolk A, Khudyakov P, Spiegelman D (2012) Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. Am J Epidemiol 175(1):66–73PubMedCrossRef Orsini N, Li R, Wolk A, Khudyakov P, Spiegelman D (2012) Meta-analysis for linear and nonlinear dose-response relations: examples, an evaluation of approximations, and software. Am J Epidemiol 175(1):66–73PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W (2006) Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 25(1):127–141PubMedCrossRef Royston P, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W (2006) Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea. Stat Med 25(1):127–141PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
12.
go back to reference Al Khalaf MM, Thalib L, Doi SAR (2011) Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 64(2):119–123 Al Khalaf MM, Thalib L, Doi SAR (2011) Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses. J Clin Epidemiol 64(2):119–123
13.
go back to reference Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (2011) Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 342:964–967CrossRef Riley RD, Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (2011) Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses. BMJ 342:964–967CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Graham PL, Moran JL (2012) Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries. J Clin Epidemiol 65(5):503–510PubMedCrossRef Graham PL, Moran JL (2012) Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries. J Clin Epidemiol 65(5):503–510PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bolt HM, Morfeld P (2012) New results on formaldehyde: the 2nd international formaldehyde science conference (Madrid, 19–20 April 2012). Arch Toxicol. doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0966-4 Bolt HM, Morfeld P (2012) New results on formaldehyde: the 2nd international formaldehyde science conference (Madrid, 19–20 April 2012). Arch Toxicol. doi:10.​1007/​s00204-012-0966-4
Metadata
Title
Formaldehyde and leukemia: missing evidence!
Author
Peter Morfeld
Publication date
01-01-2013
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 1/2013
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-012-0111-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Cancer Causes & Control 1/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine