Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2022

20-05-2022 | Breast Cancer | Clinical trial

Accuracy of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Model Among Women with LCIS

Authors: Idil Eroglu, Varadan Sevilimedu, Anna Park, Tari A. King, Melissa L. Pilewskie

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) model predicts risk of invasive breast cancer risk based on age, race, family history, breast density, and history of benign breast disease, including lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS). However, validation studies for this model included few women with LCIS. We sought to evaluate the accuracy of the BCSC model among this cohort.

Methods

Women with LCIS diagnosed between 1983 and 2017 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. The BCSC score was calculated; those with prior breast cancer, unknown breast density, age < 35 years or > 74 years, or with history of chemoprevention use were excluded. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate incidence rates. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to analyze the discriminative capacity of the model.

Results

1302 women with LCIS were included. At a median follow-up of 7 years, 152 women (12%) developed invasive cancer (6 with bilateral disease). Cumulative incidences of invasive breast cancer were 7.1% (95% CI 5.6–8.7) and 13.3% (95% CI 10.9–15.6), respectively, and the median BCSC risk scores were 4.9 and 10.4, respectively, at 5 and 10 years. The median 10-year BCSC score was significantly lower than the 10–year Tyrer-Cuzick score (10.4 vs 20.8, p < 0.001). The ROC curve scores (AUC) for BCSC at 5 and 10 years were 0.59 (95% CI 0.52–0.66) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.52–0.64), respectively.

Conclusion

The BCSC model has moderate accuracy in predicting invasive breast cancer risk among women with LCIS with fair discrimination for risk prediction between individuals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al (2005) Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5534–5541CrossRef Chuba PJ, Hamre MR, Yap J et al (2005) Bilateral risk for subsequent breast cancer after lobular carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data. J Clin Oncol 23(24):5534–5541CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM (2013) Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3240–3246CrossRef Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM (2013) Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3240–3246CrossRef
3.
go back to reference King TA, Pilewskie M, Muhsen S et al (2015) Lobular carcinoma in situ: a 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 33(33):3945–3952CrossRef King TA, Pilewskie M, Muhsen S et al (2015) Lobular carcinoma in situ: a 29-year longitudinal experience evaluating clinicopathologic features and breast cancer risk. J Clin Oncol 33(33):3945–3952CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wong SM, King T, Boileau JF, Barry WT, Golshan M (2017) Population-based analysis of breast cancer incidence and survival outcomes in women diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 24(9):2509–2517CrossRef Wong SM, King T, Boileau JF, Barry WT, Golshan M (2017) Population-based analysis of breast cancer incidence and survival outcomes in women diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 24(9):2509–2517CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148(5):337–347CrossRef Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148(5):337–347CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li CS, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K (2015) Breast density and benign breast disease: risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3137–3143CrossRef Tice JA, Miglioretti DL, Li CS, Vachon CM, Gard CC, Kerlikowske K (2015) Breast density and benign breast disease: risk assessment to identify women at high risk of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(28):3137–3143CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23(7):1111–1130CrossRef Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23(7):1111–1130CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Valero MG, Zabor EC, Park A et al (2020) The Tyrer-Cuzick Model inaccurately predicts invasive breast cancer risk in women with LCIS. Ann Surg Oncol 27(3):736–740CrossRef Valero MG, Zabor EC, Park A et al (2020) The Tyrer-Cuzick Model inaccurately predicts invasive breast cancer risk in women with LCIS. Ann Surg Oncol 27(3):736–740CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Boughey JC, Hartmann LC, Anderson SS et al (2010) Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 28(22):3591–3596CrossRef Boughey JC, Hartmann LC, Anderson SS et al (2010) Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia. J Clin Oncol 28(22):3591–3596CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frank RD, Winham SJ, Vierkant RA et al (2018) Evaluation of 2 breast cancer risk models in a benign breast disease cohort. Cancer 124(16):3319–3328CrossRef Frank RD, Winham SJ, Vierkant RA et al (2018) Evaluation of 2 breast cancer risk models in a benign breast disease cohort. Cancer 124(16):3319–3328CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Euhus DM (2020) Why breast cancer risk models fail: the case of lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 27(3):627–629CrossRef Euhus DM (2020) Why breast cancer risk models fail: the case of lobular carcinoma in situ. Ann Surg Oncol 27(3):627–629CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lo LL, Milne RL, Liao Y, Cuzick J, Terry MB, Phillips KA (2018) Validation of the IBIS breast cancer risk evaluator for women with lobular carcinoma in-situ. Br J Cancer 119(1):36–39CrossRef Lo LL, Milne RL, Liao Y, Cuzick J, Terry MB, Phillips KA (2018) Validation of the IBIS breast cancer risk evaluator for women with lobular carcinoma in-situ. Br J Cancer 119(1):36–39CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Cook NR (2007) Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115(7):928–935CrossRef Cook NR (2007) Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation 115(7):928–935CrossRef
15.
go back to reference King TA, Muhsen S, Patil S et al (2013) Is there a role for routine screening MRI in women with LCIS? Breast Cancer Res Treat 142(2):445–453CrossRef King TA, Muhsen S, Patil S et al (2013) Is there a role for routine screening MRI in women with LCIS? Breast Cancer Res Treat 142(2):445–453CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Port ER, Park A, Borgen PI, Morris E, Montgomery LL (2007) Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol 14(3):1051–1057CrossRef Port ER, Park A, Borgen PI, Morris E, Montgomery LL (2007) Results of MRI screening for breast cancer in high-risk patients with LCIS and atypical hyperplasia. Ann Surg Oncol 14(3):1051–1057CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):627–633CrossRef Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136(3):627–633CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Moyer VA (2013) Medications to decrease the risk for breast cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 159(10):698–708PubMed Moyer VA (2013) Medications to decrease the risk for breast cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 159(10):698–708PubMed
19.
go back to reference Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89CrossRef Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W et al (2007) American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57(2):75–89CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Accuracy of the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Model Among Women with LCIS
Authors
Idil Eroglu
Varadan Sevilimedu
Anna Park
Tari A. King
Melissa L. Pilewskie
Publication date
20-05-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06499-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine