Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2021

Open Access 01-02-2021 | Epidemiology

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and interstitial lung disease in the FDA adverse event reporting system: a pharmacovigilance assessment

Authors: Emanuel Raschi, Michele Fusaroli, Andrea Ardizzoni, Elisabetta Poluzzi, Fabrizio De Ponti

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We assessed pulmonary toxicity of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors by analyzing the publicly available FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Methods

Reports of interstitial lung disease (ILD) were characterized in terms of demographic information, including daily dose, latency, concomitant drugs known to be associated with ILD, and causality assessment (adapted WHO system). Disproportionality analyses were carried out by calculating reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI), accounting for major confounders, including notoriety and competition biases.

Results

ILD reports (N = 161) represented 2.1% and 0.3% of all reports for abemaciclib and palbocilcib/ribociclib, respectively, with negligible proportion of concomitant pneumotoxic drugs. Increased reporting was found for CDK4/6 inhibitors when compared to other drugs (ROR = 1.50; 95%CI = 1.28–1.74), and abemaciclib vs other anticancer agents (4.70; 3.62–5.98). Sensitivity analyses confirmed a strong and consistent disproportionality for abemaciclib. Higher-than-expected reporting emerged for palbociclib (1.38; 1.07–1.77) and ribociclib (2.39; 1.34–3.92) only when removing Japan reports. ILD occurred at recommended daily doses, with median latency ranging from 50 (abemaciclib) to 253 (ribociclib) days. Causality was highly probable in 55% of abemaciclib cases, probable in 68% of palbociclib cases.

Conclusions

Increased reporting of ILD with CDK4/6 inhibitors calls for further comparative population-based studies to characterize and quantify the actual risk, taking into account drug- and patient-related risk factors. These findings strengthen the role of (a) timely pharmacovigilance to detect post-marketing signals through FAERS and other real-world data, (b) clinicians to assess early, on a case-by-case basis, the potential responsibility of CDK4/6 inhibitors when diagnosing a lung injury.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Spring LM, Wander SA, Andre F, Moy B, Turner NC, Bardia A (2020) Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: past, present, and future. Lancet 395:817–827CrossRef Spring LM, Wander SA, Andre F, Moy B, Turner NC, Bardia A (2020) Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: past, present, and future. Lancet 395:817–827CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Guo Q, Lin X, Ye L et al (2019) Comparative efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus aromatase inhibitors versus fulvestrant for the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. Target Oncol 14:139–148CrossRef Guo Q, Lin X, Ye L et al (2019) Comparative efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus aromatase inhibitors versus fulvestrant for the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. Target Oncol 14:139–148CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kwapisz D (2017) Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166:41–54CrossRef Kwapisz D (2017) Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in breast cancer: palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Breast Cancer Res Treat 166:41–54CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thill M, Schmidt M (2018) Management of adverse events during cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor-based treatment in breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 10:1758835918793326CrossRef Thill M, Schmidt M (2018) Management of adverse events during cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor-based treatment in breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 10:1758835918793326CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Raschi E, De Ponti F (2019) Strategies for early prediction and timely recognition of drug-induced liver injury: the case of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Front Pharmacol 10:1235CrossRef Raschi E, De Ponti F (2019) Strategies for early prediction and timely recognition of drug-induced liver injury: the case of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Front Pharmacol 10:1235CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Skeoch S, Weatherley N, Swift AJ et al (2018) Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med 7:356CrossRef Skeoch S, Weatherley N, Swift AJ et al (2018) Drug-induced interstitial lung disease: a systematic review. J Clin Med 7:356CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jazieh KA, Budd GT, Dalpiaz N, Abraham J (2019) Can CDK4/6 inhibitors cause fatal lung injury? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 19:917–919CrossRef Jazieh KA, Budd GT, Dalpiaz N, Abraham J (2019) Can CDK4/6 inhibitors cause fatal lung injury? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 19:917–919CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cazzaniga ME, Danesi R, Girmenia C et al (2019) Management of toxicities associated with targeted therapies for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach is the key to success. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176:483–494CrossRef Cazzaniga ME, Danesi R, Girmenia C et al (2019) Management of toxicities associated with targeted therapies for HR-positive metastatic breast cancer: a multidisciplinary approach is the key to success. Breast Cancer Res Treat 176:483–494CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Raschi E, Mazzarella A, Antonazzo IC et al (2019) Toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors: emerging priorities from disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Target Oncol 14:205–221CrossRef Raschi E, Mazzarella A, Antonazzo IC et al (2019) Toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors: emerging priorities from disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system. Target Oncol 14:205–221CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Raschi E, Poluzzi E, Salvo F et al (2018) Pharmacovigilance of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: what a clinician should know on disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting systems. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 28:533–542CrossRef Raschi E, Poluzzi E, Salvo F et al (2018) Pharmacovigilance of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors: what a clinician should know on disproportionality analysis of spontaneous reporting systems. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 28:533–542CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bate A, Evans SJ (2009) Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18(6):427–436CrossRef Bate A, Evans SJ (2009) Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 18(6):427–436CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, LePendu P et al (2013) Performance of pharmacovigilance signal-detection algorithms for the FDA adverse event reporting system. Clin Pharmacol Ther 93:539–546CrossRef Harpaz R, DuMouchel W, LePendu P et al (2013) Performance of pharmacovigilance signal-detection algorithms for the FDA adverse event reporting system. Clin Pharmacol Ther 93:539–546CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tuccori M, Montagnani S, Capogrosso-Sansone A et al (2015) Adverse reactions to oncologic drugs: spontaneous reporting and signal detection. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 8:61–75CrossRef Tuccori M, Montagnani S, Capogrosso-Sansone A et al (2015) Adverse reactions to oncologic drugs: spontaneous reporting and signal detection. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 8:61–75CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hauben M, Hung E, Wood J, Soitkar A, Reshef D (2017) The impact of database restriction on pharmacovigilance signal detection of selected cancer therapies. Ther Adv Drug Saf 8:145–156CrossRef Hauben M, Hung E, Wood J, Soitkar A, Reshef D (2017) The impact of database restriction on pharmacovigilance signal detection of selected cancer therapies. Ther Adv Drug Saf 8:145–156CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Raschi E, Piccinni C, Poluzzi E, Marchesini G, De Ponti F (2013) The association of pancreatitis with antidiabetic drug use: gaining insight through the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Acta Diabetol 50:569–577CrossRef Raschi E, Piccinni C, Poluzzi E, Marchesini G, De Ponti F (2013) The association of pancreatitis with antidiabetic drug use: gaining insight through the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Acta Diabetol 50:569–577CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Arnaud M, Salvo F, Ahmed I et al (2016) A method for the minimization of competition bias in signal detection from spontaneous reporting databases. Drug Saf 39:251–260CrossRef Arnaud M, Salvo F, Ahmed I et al (2016) A method for the minimization of competition bias in signal detection from spontaneous reporting databases. Drug Saf 39:251–260CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wakao R, Taavola H, Sandberg L et al (2019) Data-driven identification of adverse event reporting patterns for Japan in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports. Drug Saf 42:1487–1498CrossRef Wakao R, Taavola H, Sandberg L et al (2019) Data-driven identification of adverse event reporting patterns for Japan in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports. Drug Saf 42:1487–1498CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Shakir SA, Layton D (2002) Causal association in pharmacovigilance and pharmaco epidemiology: thoughts on the application of the Austin Bradford-Hill criteria. Drug Saf 25:467–471CrossRef Shakir SA, Layton D (2002) Causal association in pharmacovigilance and pharmaco epidemiology: thoughts on the application of the Austin Bradford-Hill criteria. Drug Saf 25:467–471CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Anderson N, Borlak J (2011) Correlation versus causation? Pharmacovigilance of the analgesic flupirtine exemplifies the need for refined spontaneous ADR reporting. PLoS One 6:e25221CrossRef Anderson N, Borlak J (2011) Correlation versus causation? Pharmacovigilance of the analgesic flupirtine exemplifies the need for refined spontaneous ADR reporting. PLoS One 6:e25221CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Chandler RE (2020) Nintedanib and ischemic colitis: signal assessment with the integrated use of two types of real-world evidence, spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions, and observational data from large health-care databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.5022 Chandler RE (2020) Nintedanib and ischemic colitis: signal assessment with the integrated use of two types of real-world evidence, spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions, and observational data from large health-care databases. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​pds.​5022
26.
go back to reference Rugo HS, Huober J, García-Sáenz JA et al (2020) Management of abemaciclib-associated adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: safety analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3. Oncologist. https://doi.org/10.1002/onco.13531 Rugo HS, Huober J, García-Sáenz JA et al (2020) Management of abemaciclib-associated adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: safety analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3. Oncologist. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​onco.​13531
27.
go back to reference Matsumoto K, Nakao S, Hasegawa S et al (2020) Analysis of drug-induced interstitial lung disease using the Japanese adverse drug event report database. SAGE Open Med 8:2050312120918264PubMedPubMedCentral Matsumoto K, Nakao S, Hasegawa S et al (2020) Analysis of drug-induced interstitial lung disease using the Japanese adverse drug event report database. SAGE Open Med 8:2050312120918264PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Michel C, Scosyrev E, Petrin M, Schmouder R (2017) Can disproportionality analysis of post-marketing case reports be used for comparison of drug safety profiles? Clin Drug Investig 37:415–422CrossRef Michel C, Scosyrev E, Petrin M, Schmouder R (2017) Can disproportionality analysis of post-marketing case reports be used for comparison of drug safety profiles? Clin Drug Investig 37:415–422CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gebbia V, Valerio MR, Firenze A, Vigneri P (2020) Abemaciclib: safety and effectiveness of a unique cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19:945–954CrossRef Gebbia V, Valerio MR, Firenze A, Vigneri P (2020) Abemaciclib: safety and effectiveness of a unique cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19:945–954CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Montastruc JL, Sommet A, Bagheri H, Lapeyre-Mestre M (2011) Benefits and strengths of the disproportionality analysis for identification of adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database. Br J Clin Pharmacol 72:905–908CrossRef Montastruc JL, Sommet A, Bagheri H, Lapeyre-Mestre M (2011) Benefits and strengths of the disproportionality analysis for identification of adverse drug reactions in a pharmacovigilance database. Br J Clin Pharmacol 72:905–908CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and interstitial lung disease in the FDA adverse event reporting system: a pharmacovigilance assessment
Authors
Emanuel Raschi
Michele Fusaroli
Andrea Ardizzoni
Elisabetta Poluzzi
Fabrizio De Ponti
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2021
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-06001-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine