Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2020

01-06-2020 | Breast Cancer | Epidemiology

Ovarian removal at or after benign hysterectomy and breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study

Authors: Mathilde Gottschau, Susanne K. Kjær, Annette Settnes, Gitte Lerche Aalborg, Annet Bens, Allan Jensen, Christian Munk, Lene Mellemkjær

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Large-scale population-based registry studies investigating the risk of breast cancer after removal of both ovaries at hysterectomy for benign conditions in women with no known genetic predisposition to cancer are needed. We aimed to perform such a study taking into account the age at surgery status and use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

Methods

Within the female population of Denmark born 1937–1996, we evaluated breast cancer incidence after unilateral or bilateral oophorectomy concomitant with or after benign hysterectomy in comparison with no surgery and with hysterectomy alone using health registry data during 1978–2016. In a subpopulation followed from 1996, the analyses were stratified according to use of HRT.

Results

We found a reduced risk of breast cancer among women aged < 45 years at bilateral oophorectomy compared with women with hysterectomy alone (HR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.66, 0.92), whereas slightly increased risks were seen in women above 50 years. In the subpopulation, non-users of HRT aged ≥ 50 years at oophorectomy had a HR of 0.74 (95% CI 0.56, 0.98) for breast cancer after bilateral oophorectomy compared with hysterectomy alone.

Conclusions

Our large-scale study covering four decades provides evidence that bilateral oophorectomy performed at young age in women with benign indications for hysterectomy is associated with a reduction in breast cancer risk. The finding of a negative association at older ages in women not using HRT deserves further attention.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Topsoee MF, Ibfelt EH, Settnes A (2016) The Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database. Clin Epidemiol 8:515–520CrossRef Topsoee MF, Ibfelt EH, Settnes A (2016) The Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database. Clin Epidemiol 8:515–520CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nielsen SL, Daugbjerg SB, Gimbel H, Settnes A, Steering Committee of Danish Hysterectomy Database (2011) Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:978–984CrossRef Nielsen SL, Daugbjerg SB, Gimbel H, Settnes A, Steering Committee of Danish Hysterectomy Database (2011) Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90:978–984CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Li X, You R, Wang X, Liu C, Xu Z, Zhou J, Yu B, Xu T, Cai H, Zou Q (2016) Effectiveness of prophylactic surgeries in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Cancer Res 22:3971–3981CrossRef Li X, You R, Wang X, Liu C, Xu Z, Zhou J, Yu B, Xu T, Cai H, Zou Q (2016) Effectiveness of prophylactic surgeries in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Clin Cancer Res 22:3971–3981CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, Ikechebelu JI, Ugwu EO, Okonkwo OO (2018) Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Cochrane Database System Rev 8:Cd012464 Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, Ikechebelu JI, Ugwu EO, Okonkwo OO (2018) Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Cochrane Database System Rev 8:Cd012464
5.
go back to reference Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333CrossRef Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:321–333CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Parker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek JS (2005) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 106:219–226CrossRef Parker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek JS (2005) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol 106:219–226CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Parker WH, Feskanich D, Broder MS, Chang E, Shoupe D, Farquhar CM, Berek JS, Manson JE (2013) Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the Nurses’ Health Study. Obstet Gynecol 121:709–716CrossRef Parker WH, Feskanich D, Broder MS, Chang E, Shoupe D, Farquhar CM, Berek JS, Manson JE (2013) Long-term mortality associated with oophorectomy compared with ovarian conservation in the Nurses’ Health Study. Obstet Gynecol 121:709–716CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Laughlin GA, Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D, Von Mühlen D (2000) Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sex hormone levels in older women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:645–651PubMed Laughlin GA, Barrett-Connor E, Kritz-Silverstein D, Von Mühlen D (2000) Hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and endogenous sex hormone levels in older women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:645–651PubMed
9.
go back to reference Davison SL, Bell R, Donath S, Montalto JG, Davis SR (2005) Androgen levels in adult females: changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3847–3853CrossRef Davison SL, Bell R, Donath S, Montalto JG, Davis SR (2005) Androgen levels in adult females: changes with age, menopause, and oophorectomy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90:3847–3853CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clemons M, Goss P (2001) Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 344:276–285CrossRef Clemons M, Goss P (2001) Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 344:276–285CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sood R, Faubion SS, Kuhle CL, Thielen JM, Shuster LT (2014) Prescribing menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence-based approach. Int J Women's Health 6:47–57CrossRef Sood R, Faubion SS, Kuhle CL, Thielen JM, Shuster LT (2014) Prescribing menopausal hormone therapy: an evidence-based approach. Int J Women's Health 6:47–57CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E, Feskanich D, Farquhar C, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Berek JS, Hankinson S, Manson JE (2009) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the Nurses’ Health Study. Obstet Gynecol 113:1027–1037CrossRef Parker WH, Broder MS, Chang E, Feskanich D, Farquhar C, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Berek JS, Hankinson S, Manson JE (2009) Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy and long-term health outcomes in the Nurses’ Health Study. Obstet Gynecol 113:1027–1037CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Jacoby VL, Grady D, Wactawski-Wende J, Manson JE, Allison MA, Kuppermann M, Sarto GE, Robbins J, Phillips L, Martin LW et al (2011) Oophorectomy vs ovarian conservation with hysterectomy: cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, and cancer in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Arch Intern Med 171:760–768CrossRef Jacoby VL, Grady D, Wactawski-Wende J, Manson JE, Allison MA, Kuppermann M, Sarto GE, Robbins J, Phillips L, Martin LW et al (2011) Oophorectomy vs ovarian conservation with hysterectomy: cardiovascular disease, hip fracture, and cancer in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study. Arch Intern Med 171:760–768CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gaudet MM, Gapstur SM, Sun J, Teras LR, Campbell PT, Patel AV (2014) Oophorectomy and hysterectomy and cancer incidence in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort. Obstet Gynecol 123:1247–1255CrossRef Gaudet MM, Gapstur SM, Sun J, Teras LR, Campbell PT, Patel AV (2014) Oophorectomy and hysterectomy and cancer incidence in the Cancer Prevention Study-II Nutrition Cohort. Obstet Gynecol 123:1247–1255CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Mytton J, Evison F, Chilton PJ, Lilford RJ (2017) Removal of all ovarian tissue versus conserving ovarian tissue at time of hysterectomy in premenopausal patients with benign disease: study using routine data and data linkage. BMJ 356:j372CrossRef Mytton J, Evison F, Chilton PJ, Lilford RJ (2017) Removal of all ovarian tissue versus conserving ovarian tissue at time of hysterectomy in premenopausal patients with benign disease: study using routine data and data linkage. BMJ 356:j372CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gjerstorff ML (2011) The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):42–45CrossRef Gjerstorff ML (2011) The Danish Cancer Registry. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):42–45CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Blenstrup LT, Knudsen LB (2011) Danish registers on aspects of reproduction. Scand J of Public Health 39(7 Suppl):79–82CrossRef Blenstrup LT, Knudsen LB (2011) Danish registers on aspects of reproduction. Scand J of Public Health 39(7 Suppl):79–82CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW (2011) Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):91–94CrossRef Jensen VM, Rasmussen AW (2011) Danish education registers. Scand J Public Health 39(7 Suppl):91–94CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2014) The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 29:541–549CrossRef Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2014) The Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol 29:541–549CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2015) The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 7:449–490CrossRef Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sorensen HT (2015) The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 7:449–490CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pottegard A, Schmidt SAJ, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sorensen HT, Hallas J, Schmidt M (2017) Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol 46:798–798fPubMed Pottegard A, Schmidt SAJ, Wallach-Kildemoes H, Sorensen HT, Hallas J, Schmidt M (2017) Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry. Int J Epidemiol 46:798–798fPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zhang P, Li CZ, Jiao GM, Zhang JJ, Zhao HP, Yan F, Jia SF, Hu BS, Wu CT (2017) Effects of ovarian ablation or suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1161–1172CrossRef Zhang P, Li CZ, Jiao GM, Zhang JJ, Zhao HP, Yan F, Jia SF, Hu BS, Wu CT (2017) Effects of ovarian ablation or suppression in premenopausal breast cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1161–1172CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boggs DA, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2014) Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women. Cancer Causes Control 25:507–513CrossRef Boggs DA, Palmer JR, Rosenberg L (2014) Bilateral oophorectomy and risk of cancer in African American women. Cancer Causes Control 25:507–513CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Von Euler-Chelpin M (2011) Breast cancer incidence and use of hormone therapy in Denmark 1978–2007. Cancer Causes Control 22:181–187CrossRef Von Euler-Chelpin M (2011) Breast cancer incidence and use of hormone therapy in Denmark 1978–2007. Cancer Causes Control 22:181–187CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Adelman MR, Sharp HT (2018) Ovarian conservation vs removal at the time of benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:269–279CrossRef Adelman MR, Sharp HT (2018) Ovarian conservation vs removal at the time of benign hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 218:269–279CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ovarian removal at or after benign hysterectomy and breast cancer: a nationwide cohort study
Authors
Mathilde Gottschau
Susanne K. Kjær
Annette Settnes
Gitte Lerche Aalborg
Annet Bens
Allan Jensen
Christian Munk
Lene Mellemkjær
Publication date
01-06-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05628-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2020 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine