Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

Open Access 01-04-2019 | Care | Review

National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ

Authors: Anna R. Gagliardi, Frances C. Wright, Nicole J. Look Hong, Gary Groot, Lucy Helyer, Pamela Meiers, May Lynn Quan, Robin Urquhart, Rebecca Warburton

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this research was to generate recommendations on strategies to achieve patient-centered care (PCC) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods

Thirty clinicians (surgeons, medical/radiation oncologists, radiologists, nurses, navigators) who manage DCIS and 32 DCIS survivors aged 18 or older were nominated. Forty-six recommendations to support PCC for DCIS were derived from primary research, and rated in a two-round Delphi process from March to June 2018.

Results

A total of 29 clinicians and 27 women completed Round One, and 28 clinicians and 22 women completed Round Two. The 29 recommendations retained by both women and clinicians reflected the PCC domains of fostering patient–physician relationship (5), exchanging information (5), responding to emotions (1), managing uncertainty (4), making decisions (9), and enabling patient self-management (5). An additional 13 recommendations were retained by women only: fostering patient–physician relationship (1), exchanging information (3), responding to emotions (2), making decisions (3), and enabling patient self-management (4). Some recommendations refer to processes (i.e., ask questions about lifestyle or views about risks/outcomes to understand patient preferences); others to tools (i.e., communication aid). Panelists recommended a separate consensus process to refine the language that clinicians use when describing DCIS.

Conclusions

This is the first study to generate guidance on how to achieve PCC for DCIS. Organizations that deliver or oversee health care can use these recommendations on PCC for DCIS to plan, evaluate, or improve services. Ongoing research is needed to develop communication tools, and establish labels and language for DCIS that optimize communication.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Partridge AH, Elmore JG, Saslow D, McCaskill-Stevens W, Schnitt SJ (2012) Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making. CA Cancer J Clin 2012 62:203–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Partridge AH, Elmore JG, Saslow D, McCaskill-Stevens W, Schnitt SJ (2012) Challenges in ductal carcinoma in situ risk communication and decision-making. CA Cancer J Clin 2012 62:203–210CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Sun P (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1:888–896CrossRefPubMed Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Sun P (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1:888–896CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Raldow AC, Sher D, Chen AB, Recht A, Punglia RS (2016) Cost effectiveness of the Oncotype DX score for guiding treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 34:3963–3968CrossRefPubMed Raldow AC, Sher D, Chen AB, Recht A, Punglia RS (2016) Cost effectiveness of the Oncotype DX score for guiding treatment of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 34:3963–3968CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfeld L, Wallis M, Bartlett JM, Brookes C et al (2015) Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. Eur J Cancer 51:2296–2303CrossRef Francis A, Thomas J, Fallowfeld L, Wallis M, Bartlett JM, Brookes C et al (2015) Addressing overtreatment of screen detected DCIS; the LORIS trial. Eur J Cancer 51:2296–2303CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Skinner VP, Dif N et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ–the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51:1497–1510CrossRef Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L, van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Skinner VP, Dif N et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ–the LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51:1497–1510CrossRef
7.
go back to reference The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists (1998) The management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). CMAJ 158(Suppl3):S27–S34 The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer and Canadian Association of Radiation Oncologists (1998) The management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). CMAJ 158(Suppl3):S27–S34
8.
go back to reference Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (2010) Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:170–178CrossRefPubMed Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (2010) Ductal Carcinoma in Situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst 102:170–178CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kennedy F, Harcourt D, Rumsey N (2009) Perceptions of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) among UK health professionals. Breast 18:89–93CrossRefPubMed Kennedy F, Harcourt D, Rumsey N (2009) Perceptions of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) among UK health professionals. Breast 18:89–93CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Partridge A, Winer JP, Golshan M, Bellon JR, Blood E, Dees EC, Sampson E, Emmons KM, Winer E (2008) Perceptions and management approaches of physicians who care for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer 8:275–280CrossRefPubMed Partridge A, Winer JP, Golshan M, Bellon JR, Blood E, Dees EC, Sampson E, Emmons KM, Winer E (2008) Perceptions and management approaches of physicians who care for women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Clin Breast Cancer 8:275–280CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Fallowfield L, Matthews L, Francis A, Jenkins V, Rea D (2014) Low grade ductal carcinoma in situ: how best to describe it? Breast 23:693–696CrossRefPubMed Fallowfield L, Matthews L, Francis A, Jenkins V, Rea D (2014) Low grade ductal carcinoma in situ: how best to describe it? Breast 23:693–696CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Whitfield R, Kollias J, de Silva P, Turner J, Maddern G (2012) Management of ductal carcinoma in situ according to Van Nuys Prognostic Index in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ J Surg 82:518–523CrossRefPubMed Whitfield R, Kollias J, de Silva P, Turner J, Maddern G (2012) Management of ductal carcinoma in situ according to Van Nuys Prognostic Index in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ J Surg 82:518–523CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ruddy KJ, Meyer ME, Giobbie-Hurder A, Emmons KM, Weeks JC, Winer EP, Partridge AH (2013) Long-term risk perceptions of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncologist 18:362–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ruddy KJ, Meyer ME, Giobbie-Hurder A, Emmons KM, Weeks JC, Winer EP, Partridge AH (2013) Long-term risk perceptions of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Oncologist 18:362–368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Prinjha S, Evans J, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2011) A mastectcomy for something that wasn’t even truly invasive cancer’. Women’s understanding of having a mastectomy for screen-detected DCIS: a qualitative study. J Med Screen 18:34–40CrossRefPubMed Prinjha S, Evans J, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2011) A mastectcomy for something that wasn’t even truly invasive cancer’. Women’s understanding of having a mastectomy for screen-detected DCIS: a qualitative study. J Med Screen 18:34–40CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Davey C, White V, Warne C, Kitchen P, Villaunueva E, Erbas B (2011) Understanding a ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis: patient views and surgeon descriptions. Eur J Cancer Care 20:776–784CrossRef Davey C, White V, Warne C, Kitchen P, Villaunueva E, Erbas B (2011) Understanding a ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis: patient views and surgeon descriptions. Eur J Cancer Care 20:776–784CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Liu Y, Perez M, Schootman M, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Ellis MJ, Jeffe DB (2010) A longitudinal study of factors associated with perceived risk of recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:835–844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu Y, Perez M, Schootman M, Aft RL, Gillanders WE, Ellis MJ, Jeffe DB (2010) A longitudinal study of factors associated with perceived risk of recurrence in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early-stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 124:835–844CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher J (2010) Psychocological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691CrossRefPubMed Lauzier S, Maunsell E, Levesque P, Mondor M, Robert J, Robidoux A, Provencher J (2010) Psychocological distress and physical health in the year after diagnosis of DCIS or invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:685–691CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kim C, Liang L, Wright FC, Hong NJL, Groot G, Helyer L, Meiers P, Quan ML, Urquhart R, Warburton R, Gagliardi AR (2018) Interventions are needed to support patient-provider decision-making for DCIS: a scoping review. Breast Ca Res Treat 168:579–592CrossRef Kim C, Liang L, Wright FC, Hong NJL, Groot G, Helyer L, Meiers P, Quan ML, Urquhart R, Warburton R, Gagliardi AR (2018) Interventions are needed to support patient-provider decision-making for DCIS: a scoping review. Breast Ca Res Treat 168:579–592CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J (2013) Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff 32:223–231CrossRef Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, Sofaer S, Adams K, Bechtel C, Sweeney J (2013) Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff 32:223–231CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing The Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington DC Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing The Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academy Press, Washington DC
21.
go back to reference Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL (1993) Through the patient’s eyes. Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL (1993) Through the patient’s eyes. Understanding and promoting patient-centered care. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
22.
go back to reference Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J (2014) An integrative model of patient-centeredness—a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e107828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Scholl I, Zill JM, Härter M, Dirmaier J (2014) An integrative model of patient-centeredness—a systematic review and concept analysis. PLoS ONE 9:e107828CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Zill JM, Scholl I, Härter M, Dirmaier J (2015) Which dimensions of patient-centeredness matter?—Results of a web-based expert Delphi survey. PLoS ONE 10:e0141978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zill JM, Scholl I, Härter M, Dirmaier J (2015) Which dimensions of patient-centeredness matter?—Results of a web-based expert Delphi survey. PLoS ONE 10:e0141978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
25.
go back to reference McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams-Piehota P, Nadler E, Arora NK, Lawrence W, Street RL (2011) Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med 72:1085–1095CrossRefPubMed McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams-Piehota P, Nadler E, Arora NK, Lawrence W, Street RL (2011) Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med 72:1085–1095CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA (2013) Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 70:351–379CrossRefPubMed Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA (2013) Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 70:351–379CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D (2012) A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3:e001570CrossRef Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D (2012) A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open 3:e001570CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stewart M, Ryan BL, Bodea C (2011) Is patient-centred care associated with lower diagnostic costs? Healthcare Policy 6:27–31PubMedPubMedCentral Stewart M, Ryan BL, Bodea C (2011) Is patient-centred care associated with lower diagnostic costs? Healthcare Policy 6:27–31PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Patient- and family -centered care initiatives in acute care settings: a review. Canadian Association for Drugs & Technology in Health, Ottawa (2015) Patient- and family -centered care initiatives in acute care settings: a review. Canadian Association for Drugs & Technology in Health, Ottawa (2015)
30.
go back to reference Lo AC, Olson R, Feldman-Stewart D, Truong PT, Aquino-Parsons C, Bottorf JL, Carolan H (2017) A patient-centred approach to evaluate the information needs of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Clin Oncol 40:574–681CrossRefPubMed Lo AC, Olson R, Feldman-Stewart D, Truong PT, Aquino-Parsons C, Bottorf JL, Carolan H (2017) A patient-centred approach to evaluate the information needs of women with ductal carcinoma in situ. Am J Clin Oncol 40:574–681CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Robinson JD, Venetis M, Street RL, Kearney T (2016) Breast cancer patients’ information seeking during surgical consultations: a qualitative, videotape-based analysis of patients’ questions. J Surg Oncol 114:922–929CrossRefPubMed Robinson JD, Venetis M, Street RL, Kearney T (2016) Breast cancer patients’ information seeking during surgical consultations: a qualitative, videotape-based analysis of patients’ questions. J Surg Oncol 114:922–929CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Stelfox HT, Straus SE (2013) Measuring quality of care: considering conceptual approaches to quality indicator development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 66:1328–1337CrossRefPubMed Stelfox HT, Straus SE (2013) Measuring quality of care: considering conceptual approaches to quality indicator development and evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol 66:1328–1337CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C (2011) Using and reporting Delphi methods for selecting healthcare quality indicators. PLoS ONE 6:e20476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C (2011) Using and reporting Delphi methods for selecting healthcare quality indicators. PLoS ONE 6:e20476CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Dillman DA, Smyth JD (2007) Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys. Am J Prev Med 32(5 Suppl):S90–S96CrossRef Dillman DA, Smyth JD (2007) Design effects in the transition to web-based surveys. Am J Prev Med 32(5 Suppl):S90–S96CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearly SG (2017) Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 31:684–706CrossRefPubMed Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearly SG (2017) Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med 31:684–706CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Dagenais F (1978) The reliability and convergence of the Delphi technique. J Gen Psychol 98:307–308CrossRefPubMed Dagenais F (1978) The reliability and convergence of the Delphi technique. J Gen Psychol 98:307–308CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Fowler FJ, Gerstein BS, Barry MJ (2013) How patient centered are medical decisions? Results of a national survey. JAMA Intern Med 173:1215–1221CrossRefPubMed Fowler FJ, Gerstein BS, Barry MJ (2013) How patient centered are medical decisions? Results of a national survey. JAMA Intern Med 173:1215–1221CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Blanch-Hartigan D, Chawla N, Moser RP, Finney Rutten LJ, Hesse BW, Arora NK (2016) Trends in cancer survivors’ experience of patient-centered communication: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Cancer Surviv 10:1067–1077CrossRefPubMed Blanch-Hartigan D, Chawla N, Moser RP, Finney Rutten LJ, Hesse BW, Arora NK (2016) Trends in cancer survivors’ experience of patient-centered communication: results from the Health Information National Trends Survey. J Cancer Surviv 10:1067–1077CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Reddy A, Canamucio A, Werner RM (2015) Impact of the patient-centered medical home on veterans’ experience of care. Am J Manag Care 21:413–421PubMed Reddy A, Canamucio A, Werner RM (2015) Impact of the patient-centered medical home on veterans’ experience of care. Am J Manag Care 21:413–421PubMed
41.
go back to reference Ryan J (2016) How high-need patients experience health care in the United States. Findings from the 2016 Commonwealth Fund survey of high-need patients. Commonwealth Fund, Boston Ryan J (2016) How high-need patients experience health care in the United States. Findings from the 2016 Commonwealth Fund survey of high-need patients. Commonwealth Fund, Boston
42.
go back to reference Salzberg CA, Hayes SL, McCarthy D, Radley DC, Abrams MK, Shah T, Anderson GF (2016) Health system performance for the high-need patient: a look at access to care and patient care experiences. Commonwealth Fund, Boston Salzberg CA, Hayes SL, McCarthy D, Radley DC, Abrams MK, Shah T, Anderson GF (2016) Health system performance for the high-need patient: a look at access to care and patient care experiences. Commonwealth Fund, Boston
43.
go back to reference Park M, Giap TT, Lee M, Jeong H, Go Y (2018) Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud 87:69–83CrossRefPubMed Park M, Giap TT, Lee M, Jeong H, Go Y (2018) Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud 87:69–83CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Chin-Lenn L, Craighead P, Bryant HE, Mack L, Temple W, Ghali W, Quan ML (2013) Quality indicators for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: development using a multidisciplinary delphi process and its use in monitoring population-based treatment. J Surg Oncol 108:348–351CrossRefPubMed Chin-Lenn L, Craighead P, Bryant HE, Mack L, Temple W, Ghali W, Quan ML (2013) Quality indicators for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: development using a multidisciplinary delphi process and its use in monitoring population-based treatment. J Surg Oncol 108:348–351CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Omer ZB, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ, Howe R, Ozanne EM (2013) Impact of ductal carcinoma in situ terminology on patient treatment preferences. JAMA Intern Med 173:1830–1831CrossRefPubMed Omer ZB, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ, Howe R, Ozanne EM (2013) Impact of ductal carcinoma in situ terminology on patient treatment preferences. JAMA Intern Med 173:1830–1831CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Nickel B, Moynihan R, Barratt A, Brito JP, McCaffery K (2018) Renaming low risk conditions labelled as cancer. BMJ 362:3322CrossRef Nickel B, Moynihan R, Barratt A, Brito JP, McCaffery K (2018) Renaming low risk conditions labelled as cancer. BMJ 362:3322CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB et al (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001431PubMed Stacey D, Legare F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB et al (2017) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD001431PubMed
50.
go back to reference O’Donnell S, Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, Graham ID, O’Connor AM, Tugwell P (2016) Understanding and overcoming the barriers of implementing patient decision aids in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract 12:174–181CrossRef O’Donnell S, Cranney A, Jacobsen MJ, Graham ID, O’Connor AM, Tugwell P (2016) Understanding and overcoming the barriers of implementing patient decision aids in clinical practice. J Eval Clin Pract 12:174–181CrossRef
Metadata
Title
National consensus recommendations on patient-centered care for ductal carcinoma in situ
Authors
Anna R. Gagliardi
Frances C. Wright
Nicole J. Look Hong
Gary Groot
Lucy Helyer
Pamela Meiers
May Lynn Quan
Robin Urquhart
Rebecca Warburton
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Care
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-019-05132-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine