Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018

Open Access 01-11-2018 | Preclinical study

Co-expressed genes enhance precision of receptor status identification in breast cancer patients

Authors: Michael Kenn, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong, Christian F. Singer, Michael Cibena, Heinz Kölbl, Wolfgang Schreiner

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Therapeutic decisions in breast cancer patients crucially depend on the status of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2, obtained by immunohistochemistry (IHC). These are known to be inaccurate sometimes, and we demonstrate how to use gene-expression to increase precision of receptor status.

Methods

We downloaded data from 3241 breast cancer patients out of 36 clinical studies. For each receptor, we modelled the mRNA expression of the receptor gene and a co-gene by logistic regression. For each patient, predictions from logistic regression were merged with information from IHC on a probabilistic basis to arrive at a fused prediction result.

Results

We introduce Sankey diagrams to visualize the step by step increase of precision as information is added from gene expression: IHC-estimates are qualified as ‘confirmed’, ‘rejected’ or ‘corrected’. Additionally, we introduce the category ‘inconclusive’ to spot those patients in need for additional assessments so as to increase diagnostic precision and safety.

Conclusions

We demonstrate a sound mathematical basis for the fusion of information, even if partly contradictive. The concept is extendable to more than three sources of information, as particularly important for OMICS data. The overall number of undecidable cases is reduced as well as those assessed falsely. We outline how decision rules may be extended to also weigh consequences, being different in severity for false-positive and false-negative assessments, respectively. The possible benefit is demonstrated by comparing the disease free survival between patients whose IHC could be confirmed versus those for which it was corrected.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Precision is also called ‘positive predictive value’ according to the terminology of machine learning.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:1134–1150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris LN, Ismaila N, McShane LM, Andre F, Collyar DE, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2016) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:1134–1150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B et al (2008) Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 10:R65CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Singer CF, Tan YY, Fitzal F, Steger GG, Egle D, Reiner A et al (2017) Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab is dependent on HER2/CEP17 ratio in HER2-amplified early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:3676–3683CrossRefPubMed Singer CF, Tan YY, Fitzal F, Steger GG, Egle D, Reiner A et al (2017) Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab is dependent on HER2/CEP17 ratio in HER2-amplified early breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23:3676–3683CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, Gray RJ, Pritchard KI, Chapman JAW et al (2007) Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25:2127–2132CrossRefPubMed Hudis CA, Barlow WE, Costantino JP, Gray RJ, Pritchard KI, Chapman JAW et al (2007) Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials: the STEEP system. J Clin Oncol 25:2127–2132CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Laas E, Mallon P, Duhoux FP, Hamidouche A, Rouzier R, Reyal F (2016) Low concordance between gene expression signatures in ER positive HER2 negative breast carcinoma could impair their clinical application. PLoS ONE 11:e0148957CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Laas E, Mallon P, Duhoux FP, Hamidouche A, Rouzier R, Reyal F (2016) Low concordance between gene expression signatures in ER positive HER2 negative breast carcinoma could impair their clinical application. PLoS ONE 11:e0148957CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Wells CA, Sloane JP, Coleman D, Munt C, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N et al (2004) Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union—an inter-laboratory study. Virchows Arch 445:119–128CrossRefPubMed Wells CA, Sloane JP, Coleman D, Munt C, Amendoeira I, Apostolikas N et al (2004) Consistency of staining and reporting of oestrogen receptor immunocytochemistry within the European Union—an inter-laboratory study. Virchows Arch 445:119–128CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC, Mangu PB, Temin S (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. JOP 6:195–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hammond ME, Hayes DF, Wolff AC, Mangu PB, Temin S (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer. JOP 6:195–197CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Bartlett JM, Campbell FM, Ibrahim M, O’Grady A, Kay E, Faulkes C et al (2011) A UK NEQAS ISH multicenter ring study using the ventana HER2 dual-color ISH assay. Am J Clin Pathol 135:157–162CrossRefPubMed Bartlett JM, Campbell FM, Ibrahim M, O’Grady A, Kay E, Faulkes C et al (2011) A UK NEQAS ISH multicenter ring study using the ventana HER2 dual-color ISH assay. Am J Clin Pathol 135:157–162CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lee M, Lee CS, Tan PH (2013) Hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: postanalytical issues. J Clin Pathol 66:478–484CrossRefPubMed Lee M, Lee CS, Tan PH (2013) Hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: postanalytical issues. J Clin Pathol 66:478–484CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rakha EA, Pinder SE, Bartlett JM, Ibrahim M, Starczynski J, Carder PJ et al (2015) Updated UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 68:93–99CrossRefPubMed Rakha EA, Pinder SE, Bartlett JM, Ibrahim M, Starczynski J, Carder PJ et al (2015) Updated UK recommendations for HER2 assessment in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 68:93–99CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Li Q, Eklund AC, Juul N, Haibe-Kains B, Workman CT, Richardson AL et al (2010) Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status. PLoS ONE 5:e15031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li Q, Eklund AC, Juul N, Haibe-Kains B, Workman CT, Richardson AL et al (2010) Minimising immunohistochemical false negative ER classification using a complementary 23 gene expression signature of ER status. PLoS ONE 5:e15031CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Gong Y, Yan K, Lin F, Anderson K, Sotiriou C, Andre F et al (2007) Determination of oestrogen-receptor status and ERBB2 status of breast carcinoma: a gene-expression profiling study. Lancet Oncol 8:203–211CrossRefPubMed Gong Y, Yan K, Lin F, Anderson K, Sotiriou C, Andre F et al (2007) Determination of oestrogen-receptor status and ERBB2 status of breast carcinoma: a gene-expression profiling study. Lancet Oncol 8:203–211CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bergqvist J, Ohd JF, Smeds J, Klaar S, Isola J, Nordgren H et al (2007) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis and microarray-based RNA expression of HER2 in relation to outcome. Ann Oncol 18:845–850CrossRefPubMed Bergqvist J, Ohd JF, Smeds J, Klaar S, Isola J, Nordgren H et al (2007) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis and microarray-based RNA expression of HER2 in relation to outcome. Ann Oncol 18:845–850CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Witzel ID, Milde-Langosch K, Wirtz RM, Roth C, Ihnen M, Mahner S et al (2010) Comparison of microarray-based RNA expression with ELISA-based protein determination of HER2, uPA and PAI-1 in tumour tissue of patients with breast cancer and relation to outcome. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136:1709–1718CrossRefPubMed Witzel ID, Milde-Langosch K, Wirtz RM, Roth C, Ihnen M, Mahner S et al (2010) Comparison of microarray-based RNA expression with ELISA-based protein determination of HER2, uPA and PAI-1 in tumour tissue of patients with breast cancer and relation to outcome. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136:1709–1718CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chen X, Li J, Gray WH, Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Shyr Y et al (2012) TNBCtype: a subtyping tool for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Inform 11:147–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen X, Li J, Gray WH, Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Shyr Y et al (2012) TNBCtype: a subtyping tool for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Inform 11:147–156CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Kenn M, Schlangen K, Castillo-Tong DC, Singer CF, Cibena M, Koelbl H et al (2017) Gene expression information improves reliability of receptor status in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 8:77341–77359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kenn M, Schlangen K, Castillo-Tong DC, Singer CF, Cibena M, Koelbl H et al (2017) Gene expression information improves reliability of receptor status in breast cancer patients. Oncotarget 8:77341–77359CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Owzar K, Barry WT, Jung SH, Sohn I, George SL (2008) Statistical challenges in pre-processing in microarray experiments in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:5959–5966CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Owzar K, Barry WT, Jung SH, Sohn I, George SL (2008) Statistical challenges in pre-processing in microarray experiments in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 14:5959–5966CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Lin CY, Ström A, Vega VB, Kong SL, Yeo AL, Thomsen JS et al (2004) Discovery of estrogen receptor α target genes and response elements in breast tumor cells. Genome Biol 5:R66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lin CY, Ström A, Vega VB, Kong SL, Yeo AL, Thomsen JS et al (2004) Discovery of estrogen receptor α target genes and response elements in breast tumor cells. Genome Biol 5:R66CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ikeda K, Horie-Inoue K, Inoue S (2015) Identification of estrogen-responsive genes based on the DNA binding properties of estrogen receptors using high-throughput sequencing technology. Acta Pharmacol Sin 36:24–31CrossRefPubMed Ikeda K, Horie-Inoue K, Inoue S (2015) Identification of estrogen-responsive genes based on the DNA binding properties of estrogen receptors using high-throughput sequencing technology. Acta Pharmacol Sin 36:24–31CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. In: Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. In: Monographs on statistics and applied probability, 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London
23.
go back to reference Powers DM (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. 2 edn. pp. 37–63 Powers DM (2011) Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation. 2 edn. pp. 37–63
24.
Metadata
Title
Co-expressed genes enhance precision of receptor status identification in breast cancer patients
Authors
Michael Kenn
Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong
Christian F. Singer
Michael Cibena
Heinz Kölbl
Wolfgang Schreiner
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4920-x

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine