Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018

01-11-2018 | Epidemiology

Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer

Authors: Gelareh Farshid, David Walters

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Detection of breast cancers by mammographic screening confers a survival advantage of 20–50% compared to symptomatic presentations. The improved prognosis is only partly explained by stage migration. The distribution of the molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer (SDBC) or their HER2 status has not been studied extensively. We wished to address these issues through the study of a large series of SDBC, with other presentations serving as controls.

Design

Deidentified cases of female invasive cancer, diagnosed in Australia and New Zealand during 2005–2015, were retrieved from the BreastSurgANZ Quality Audit (BQA). Method of detection and selected patient, tumour and treatment data were assessed. Immunohistochemical surrogates for molecular subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2−), Luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2+), HER2-enriched (ER−, PR− and HER2+) and basal-like (triple negative). Results were compared with the findings of controls and previous studies.

Result

100983 invasive cancers were diagnosed, including 32493 (32.7%) SDBC and 66907 (67.3%) with other presentations. The biomarker profile for SDBC versus other presentations in the same population was ER 89.3 versus 80.3%, PR 78.8 versus 69.8% and for HER2 11 versus 15.6%. The distribution of molecular subtypes was Luminal A 81.9 versus 70.74%, Luminal B 7.39 versus 9.52%, HER2-enriched 3.63 versus 6.06% and Basal-like 7.08 versus 13.68%. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Molecular profiles of SDBC are significantly different from those of symptomatic cancers, with over-representation of the Luminal A and proportionately lower rates of all other subtypes. We have shown, for the first time, significantly lower rates of HER2 positivity in SDBC. These differences may contribute to the better survival of SDBC and have implications for prognostication, targeted therapy decisions and for laboratory quality assurance programs in setting target ranges for proportions of ER-positive and HER2 results in heavily screened populations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cortesi L, Chiuri VE, Ruscelli S et al (2006) Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based study. BMC Cancer 6:17CrossRef Cortesi L, Chiuri VE, Ruscelli S et al (2006) Prognosis of screen-detected breast cancers: results of a population based study. BMC Cancer 6:17CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gill PG, Farshid G, Luke CG, Roder DM (2004) Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast 13:15–22CrossRef Gill PG, Farshid G, Luke CG, Roder DM (2004) Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast 13:15–22CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Huovinen R et al (2014) Outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant trastuzumab in the Finland Capecitabine Trial (FinXX). Acta Oncol 53:186–194CrossRef Joensuu H, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL, Huovinen R et al (2014) Outcome of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant trastuzumab in the Finland Capecitabine Trial (FinXX). Acta Oncol 53:186–194CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA (2005) Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1195–1203CrossRef Shen Y, Yang Y, Inoue LY, Munsell MF, Miller AB, Berry DA (2005) Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1195–1203CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD et al (2008) Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone? Br J Cancer 98:1741–1744CrossRef Wishart GC, Greenberg DC, Britton PD et al (2008) Screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancer: is improved survival due to stage migration alone? Br J Cancer 98:1741–1744CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Curigliano G, Viale G, Bagnardi V et al (2009) Clinical relevance of HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with small tumor size and node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5693–5699CrossRef Curigliano G, Viale G, Bagnardi V et al (2009) Clinical relevance of HER2 overexpression/amplification in patients with small tumor size and node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:5693–5699CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Joerger M, Thurlimann B, Huober J (2010) Small HER2-positive, node-negative breast cancer: who should receive systemic adjuvant treatment? Ann Oncol 22:17–23CrossRef Joerger M, Thurlimann B, Huober J (2010) Small HER2-positive, node-negative breast cancer: who should receive systemic adjuvant treatment? Ann Oncol 22:17–23CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brunelli M, Manfrin E, Bria E et al (2013) HER2/neu gene determination in women screened for breast carcinoma: how screening programs reduce the skyrocketing cost of targeted therapy. Anticancer Res 33:3705–3710PubMed Brunelli M, Manfrin E, Bria E et al (2013) HER2/neu gene determination in women screened for breast carcinoma: how screening programs reduce the skyrocketing cost of targeted therapy. Anticancer Res 33:3705–3710PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dawson SJ, Duffy SW, Blows FM et al (2009) Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival. Br J Cancer 101:1338–1344CrossRef Dawson SJ, Duffy SW, Blows FM et al (2009) Molecular characteristics of screen-detected vs symptomatic breast cancers and their impact on survival. Br J Cancer 101:1338–1344CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sihto H, Lundin J, Lehtimaki T et al (2008) Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening. Clin Cancer Res 14:4103–4110CrossRef Sihto H, Lundin J, Lehtimaki T et al (2008) Molecular subtypes of breast cancers detected in mammography screening and outside of screening. Clin Cancer Res 14:4103–4110CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ellis C (2005) HER2 amplificaiton status in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 58:710–714CrossRef Ellis C (2005) HER2 amplificaiton status in breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 58:710–714CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bilous M, Morey AL, Armes JE et al (2012) Assessing HER2 amplification in breast cancer: findings from the Australian in situ hybridization program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:617–624CrossRef Bilous M, Morey AL, Armes JE et al (2012) Assessing HER2 amplification in breast cancer: findings from the Australian in situ hybridization program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 134:617–624CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Farshid G, Armes JE, Bell R et al (2010) Establishment of the Australian in situ hybridization program for the assessment of HER2 amplification in breast cancer: a model for the introduction of new biomarkers into clinical practice. Diagn Mol Pathol 19:187–193CrossRef Farshid G, Armes JE, Bell R et al (2010) Establishment of the Australian in situ hybridization program for the assessment of HER2 amplification in breast cancer: a model for the introduction of new biomarkers into clinical practice. Diagn Mol Pathol 19:187–193CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Blows FM, Driver KE, Schmidt MK et al (2010) Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 7:e1000279CrossRef Blows FM, Driver KE, Schmidt MK et al (2010) Subtyping of breast cancer by immunohistochemistry to investigate a relationship between subtype and short and long term survival: a collaborative analysis of data for 10,159 cases from 12 studies. PLoS Med 7:e1000279CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bauer K, Parise C, Caggiano V (2010) Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen Consensus Statement for early breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:228CrossRef Bauer K, Parise C, Caggiano V (2010) Use of ER/PR/HER2 subtypes in conjunction with the 2007 St Gallen Consensus Statement for early breast cancer. BMC Cancer 10:228CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Dawood S, Hu R, Homes MD et al (2011) Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126:185–192CrossRef Dawood S, Hu R, Homes MD et al (2011) Defining breast cancer prognosis based on molecular phenotypes: results from a large cohort study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126:185–192CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Domingo L, Salas D, Zubizarreta R et al (2014) Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain. Breast Cancer Res 16:R3CrossRef Domingo L, Salas D, Zubizarreta R et al (2014) Tumor phenotype and breast density in distinct categories of interval cancer: results of population-based mammography screening in Spain. Breast Cancer Res 16:R3CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genom 7:96CrossRef Hu Z, Fan C, Oh DS et al (2006) The molecular portraits of breast tumors are conserved across microarray platforms. BMC Genom 7:96CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRef Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874CrossRef Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747CrossRef Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thurlimann B, Senn HJ (2011) Strategies for subtypes–dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Independent UK, Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786CrossRef Independent UK, Panel on Breast Cancer Screening (2012) The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 380:1778–1786CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, et al. (2017) De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol 28:1700–1712CrossRef Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, et al. (2017) De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Ann Oncol 28:1700–1712CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Farshid G, Sullivan T, Downey P, Gill PG, Pieterse S (2011) Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases. Br J Cancer 105:1669–1675CrossRef Farshid G, Sullivan T, Downey P, Gill PG, Pieterse S (2011) Independent predictors of breast malignancy in screen-detected microcalcifications: biopsy results in 2545 cases. Br J Cancer 105:1669–1675CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Borgquist S, Zhou W, Jirstrom K et al (2015) The prognostic role of HER2 expression in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS); a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 15:468CrossRef Borgquist S, Zhou W, Jirstrom K et al (2015) The prognostic role of HER2 expression in ductal breast carcinoma in situ (DCIS); a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 15:468CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Hofvind S, Lee CI, Elmore JG (2012) Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:291–299CrossRef Hofvind S, Lee CI, Elmore JG (2012) Stage-specific breast cancer incidence rates among participants and non-participants of a population-based mammographic screening program. Breast Cancer Res Treat 135:291–299CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Duffy SW, Dibden A, Michalopoulos D et al (2016) Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 17:109–114CrossRef Duffy SW, Dibden A, Michalopoulos D et al (2016) Screen detection of ductal carcinoma in situ and subsequent incidence of invasive interval breast cancers: a retrospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 17:109–114CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Crosier M, Scott D, Wilson RG, Griffiths CD, May FE, Westley BR (1999) Differences in Ki67 and c-erbB2 expression between screen-detected and true interval breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res 5:2682–2688PubMed Crosier M, Scott D, Wilson RG, Griffiths CD, May FE, Westley BR (1999) Differences in Ki67 and c-erbB2 expression between screen-detected and true interval breast cancers. Clin Cancer Res 5:2682–2688PubMed
30.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Lehtimaki T, Holli K et al (2004) Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA 292:1064–1073CrossRef Joensuu H, Lehtimaki T, Holli K et al (2004) Risk for distant recurrence of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods. JAMA 292:1064–1073CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Falck AK, Rome A, Ferno M et al (2016) St Gallen molecular subtypes in screening-detected and symptomatic breast cancer in a prospective cohort with long-term follow-up. Br J Surg 103:513–523CrossRef Falck AK, Rome A, Ferno M et al (2016) St Gallen molecular subtypes in screening-detected and symptomatic breast cancer in a prospective cohort with long-term follow-up. Br J Surg 103:513–523CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ et al (2014) Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:103–111CrossRef Drukker CA, Schmidt MK, Rutgers EJ et al (2014) Mammographic screening detects low-risk tumor biology breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 144:103–111CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Wishart GC, Bajdik CD, Dicks E et al (2012) PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2. Br J Cancer 107:800–807CrossRef Wishart GC, Bajdik CD, Dicks E et al (2012) PREDICT Plus: development and validation of a prognostic model for early breast cancer that includes HER2. Br J Cancer 107:800–807CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Candido Dos Reis FJ, Wishart GC, Dicks EM et al (2017) An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation. Breast Cancer Res 19:58CrossRef Candido Dos Reis FJ, Wishart GC, Dicks EM et al (2017) An updated PREDICT breast cancer prognostication and treatment benefit prediction model with independent validation. Breast Cancer Res 19:58CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Molecular subtypes of screen-detected breast cancer
Authors
Gelareh Farshid
David Walters
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4899-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine