Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018

Open Access 01-09-2018 | Clinical trial

Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction

Authors: Rachel L. O’Connell, Komel Khabra, Jeffrey C. Bamber, Nandita deSouza, Farid Meybodi, Peter A. Barry, Jennifer E. Rusby

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Three-dimensional surface imaging (3D-SI) of the breasts enables the measurement of breast volume and shape symmetry. If these measurements were sufficiently accurate and repeatable, they could be used in planning oncological breast surgery and as an objective measure of aesthetic outcome. The aim of this study was to validate the measurements of breast volume and symmetry provided by the Vectra XT imaging system.

Methods

To validate measurements, breast phantom models of true volume between 100 and 1000 cm3 were constructed and varying amounts removed to mimic breast tissue ‘resections’. The volumes of the phantoms were measured using 3D-SI by two observers and compared to a gold standard. For intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility in vivo, 16 patients who had undergone oncological breast surgery had breast volume and symmetry measured three times by two observers.

Results

A mean relative difference of 2.17 and 2.28% for observer 1 and 2 respectively was seen in the phantom measurements compared to the gold standard (n = 45, Bland Altman agreement). Intra-observer variation over ten repeated measurements demonstrated mean coefficients of variation (CV) of 0.58 and 0.49%, respectively. The inter-observer variation demonstrated a mean relative difference of 0.11% between the two observers. In patients, intra-observer variation over three repeated volume measurements for each observer was 3.9 and 3.8% (mean CV); the mean relative difference between observers was 5.78%. For three repeated shape symmetry measurements using RMS projection difference between the two breasts, the intra-observer variations were 8 and 14% (mean CV), the mean relative difference between observers was 0.43 mm for average symmetry values that ranged from about 3.5 to 15.5 mm.

Conclusion

This first validation of breast volume and shape symmetry measurements using the Vectra XT 3D-SI system suggests that these measurements have the potential to assist in pre-operative planning and also as a measure of aesthetic outcome.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burke PH et al (1983) Stereophotographic measurement of change in facial soft tissue morphology following surgery. Br J Oral Surg 21(4):237–245CrossRefPubMed Burke PH et al (1983) Stereophotographic measurement of change in facial soft tissue morphology following surgery. Br J Oral Surg 21(4):237–245CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Burke PH, Beard LF, Stereo-photogrammetry of the face. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc, 1967: 279–293 Burke PH, Beard LF, Stereo-photogrammetry of the face. Rep Congr Eur Orthod Soc, 1967: 279–293
3.
go back to reference O’Connell RL et al (2015) Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Breast 24(4):331–342CrossRefPubMed O’Connell RL et al (2015) Review of three-dimensional (3D) surface imaging for oncoplastic, reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery. Breast 24(4):331–342CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nahabedian MY, Galdino G (2003) Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1582–1590CrossRefPubMed Nahabedian MY, Galdino G (2003) Symmetrical breast reconstruction: is there a role for three-dimensional digital photography? Plast Reconstr Surg 112(6):1582–1590CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference O’Connell RL et al (2016) Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160(1):79–89CrossRefPubMed O’Connell RL et al (2016) Initial experience of the BREAST-Q breast-conserving therapy module. Breast Cancer Res Treat 160(1):79–89CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Singh N, Picha GJ, Murphy DK (2016) Natrelle silicone breast implant follow-up study: demographics, lifestyle, and surgical characteristics of more than 50,000 augmentation subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(1):70–81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Singh N, Picha GJ, Murphy DK (2016) Natrelle silicone breast implant follow-up study: demographics, lifestyle, and surgical characteristics of more than 50,000 augmentation subjects. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(1):70–81CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–410CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–410CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (1999) Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol 25(6):571–573CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (1999) Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol 25(6):571–573CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Waljee JF et al (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3331–3337CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF et al (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26(20):3331–3337CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Heil J et al (2010) Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast 19(6):470–474CrossRefPubMed Heil J et al (2010) Aesthetic and functional results after breast conserving surgery as correlates of quality of life measured by a German version of the Breast Cancer Treatment Outcome Scale (BCTOS). Breast 19(6):470–474CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Henseler H et al (2011) Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(5):577–582CrossRefPubMed Henseler H et al (2011) Investigation into accuracy and reproducibility of a 3D breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(5):577–582CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kovacs L et al (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRefPubMed Kovacs L et al (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cochrane RA et al (2003) Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 90(12):1505–1509CrossRefPubMed Cochrane RA et al (2003) Cosmesis and satisfaction after breast-conserving surgery correlates with the percentage of breast volume excised. Br J Surg 90(12):1505–1509CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(2):313–320CrossRefPubMed Sigurdson LJ, Kirkland SA (2006) Breast volume determination in breast hypertrophy: an accurate method using two anthropomorphic measurements. Plast Reconstr Surg 118(2):313–320CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mailey B et al (2013) Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):84–92CrossRefPubMed Mailey B et al (2013) Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of Portrait 3D Surgical Simulation Platform in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):84–92CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Losken A et al (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRefPubMed Losken A et al (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Onesti MG et al (2004) Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation. Acta Chir Plast 46(1):8–11PubMed Onesti MG et al (2004) Breast asymmetry: a new vision of this malformation. Acta Chir Plast 46(1):8–11PubMed
20.
go back to reference Henseler H et al (2013) Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(5):634–639CrossRefPubMed Henseler H et al (2013) Subjective versus objective assessment of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(5):634–639CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Henseler H et al (2012) Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(9):1209–1215CrossRefPubMed Henseler H et al (2012) Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(9):1209–1215CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Moyer HR et al (2008) Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):227–232CrossRefPubMed Moyer HR et al (2008) Three-dimensional digital evaluation of breast symmetry after breast conservation therapy. J Am Coll Surg 207(2):227–232CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Liu C et al (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2125–2132CrossRefPubMed Liu C et al (2010) The role of three-dimensional scanning technique in evaluation of breast asymmetry in breast augmentation: a 100-case study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2125–2132CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Losken A et al (2005) An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg 55(6):571–575CrossRefPubMed Losken A et al (2005) An objective evaluation of breast symmetry and shape differences using 3-dimensional images. Ann Plast Surg 55(6):571–575CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference O’Connell RL et al (2017) The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT). Breast Cancer Res Treat 164(2):385–393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Connell RL et al (2017) The potential role of three-dimensional surface imaging as a tool to evaluate aesthetic outcome after Breast Conserving Therapy (BCT). Breast Cancer Res Treat 164(2):385–393CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Validation of the Vectra XT three-dimensional imaging system for measuring breast volume and symmetry following oncological reconstruction
Authors
Rachel L. O’Connell
Komel Khabra
Jeffrey C. Bamber
Nandita deSouza
Farid Meybodi
Peter A. Barry
Jennifer E. Rusby
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4843-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine