Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019

01-04-2019 | Breast Cancer | Epidemiology

BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations and chemotherapy-related hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients

Authors: Alex Friedlaender, Aurélie Vuilleumier, Valeria Viassolo, Aurélie Ayme, Solène De Talhouet, Jean-Damien Combes, Julien Peron, Alexandre Bodmer, Sophie Giraud, Adrien Buisson, Valerie Bonadona, Isabelle Gauchat-Bouchardy, Olivier Tredan, Pierre O. Chappuis, S. Intidhar Labidi-Galy

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

BRCA1 and BRCA2 proteins are central to DNA repair process through homologous recombination. We hypothesize that BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers may exhibit increased hematological toxicity when receiving genotoxic chemotherapy.

Methods

We included women with primary breast cancers screened for BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations and treated with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy in Geneva (Swiss cohort). The primary endpoint was the incidence of febrile neutropenia following the first chemotherapy cycle (C1). Secondary endpoints were the incidence of grade 3–4 neutropenia, grade 4 neutropenia and hospitalization during C1, G-CSF use and chemotherapy dose reduction during the entire chemotherapy regimen. Long-term toxicities (hematological, cardiac and neuropathy) were assessed in the Swiss cohort and a second cohort of patients from Lyon (French cohort).

Results

Overall, 221 patients were assessed for acute hematological toxicity, including 23 BRCA1 and 22 BRCA2 carriers. Following the C1, febrile neutropenia had an incidence of 35% (p = 0.002), 14% (p = 0.562) and 10% among BRCA1, BRCA2 and non-carriers, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was found in 57% of BRCA1 (p < 0.001), 14% of BRCA2 (p = 0.861) and 18% of non-carriers. G-CSF support was necessary in 86% of BRCA1 (p = 0.005), 64% of BRCA2 (p = 0.285) and 51% of non-carriers. For long-term toxicity analysis, 898 patients were included (167 BRCA1-, 91 BRCA2- and 640 non-carriers). There was no difference between the 3 groups.

Conclusions

BRCA1 germline mutations is associated with greater acute hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients. These observations could have implication for primary prophylaxis with G-CSF.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Kuchenbaecker KB et al (2017) Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS. JAMA 317(23):2402–2416CrossRefPubMed Kuchenbaecker KB et al (2017) Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS. JAMA 317(23):2402–2416CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Venkitaraman AR (2002) Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 108(2):171–182CrossRefPubMed Venkitaraman AR (2002) Cancer susceptibility and the functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cell 108(2):171–182CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Moynahan ME, Jasin M (2010) Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(3):196–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Moynahan ME, Jasin M (2010) Mitotic homologous recombination maintains genomic stability and suppresses tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11(3):196–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Prakash R et al (2015) Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(4):a016600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Prakash R et al (2015) Homologous recombination and human health: the roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and associated proteins. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 7(4):a016600CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference De Picciotto N et al (2016) Ovarian cancer: status of homologous recombination pathway as a predictor of drug response. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 101:50–59CrossRefPubMed De Picciotto N et al (2016) Ovarian cancer: status of homologous recombination pathway as a predictor of drug response. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 101:50–59CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Konishi H et al (2011) Mutation of a single allele of the cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 leads to genomic instability in human breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(43):17773–17778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Konishi H et al (2011) Mutation of a single allele of the cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 leads to genomic instability in human breast epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(43):17773–17778CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Sedic M et al (2015) Haploinsufficiency for BRCA1 leads to cell-type-specific genomic instability and premature senescence. Nat Commun 6:7505CrossRefPubMed Sedic M et al (2015) Haploinsufficiency for BRCA1 leads to cell-type-specific genomic instability and premature senescence. Nat Commun 6:7505CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference Pathania S et al (2014) BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells. Nat Commun 5:5496CrossRefPubMed Pathania S et al (2014) BRCA1 haploinsufficiency for replication stress suppression in primary cells. Nat Commun 5:5496CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
go back to reference Huszno J et al (2013) The influence of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations on toxicity related to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients. Oncology 85(5):278–282CrossRefPubMed Huszno J et al (2013) The influence of BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations on toxicity related to chemotherapy and radiotherapy in early breast cancer patients. Oncology 85(5):278–282CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Shanley S et al (2006) Acute chemotherapy-related toxicity is not increased in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers treated for breast cancer in the United Kingdom. Clin Cancer Res 12(23):7033–7038CrossRefPubMed Shanley S et al (2006) Acute chemotherapy-related toxicity is not increased in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers treated for breast cancer in the United Kingdom. Clin Cancer Res 12(23):7033–7038CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Crawford J et al (1991) Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 325(3):164–170CrossRefPubMed Crawford J et al (1991) Reduction by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor of fever and neutropenia induced by chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 325(3):164–170CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lyman GH et al (2010) Risk of mortality in patients with cancer who experience febrile neutropenia. Cancer 116(23):5555–5563CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH et al (2010) Risk of mortality in patients with cancer who experience febrile neutropenia. Cancer 116(23):5555–5563CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lyman GH, Abella E, Pettengell R (2014) Risk factors for febrile neutropenia among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 90(3):190–199CrossRefPubMed Lyman GH, Abella E, Pettengell R (2014) Risk factors for febrile neutropenia among patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 90(3):190–199CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vogel CL et al (2005) First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 23(6):1178–1184CrossRefPubMed Vogel CL et al (2005) First and subsequent cycle use of pegfilgrastim prevents febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer: a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study. J Clin Oncol 23(6):1178–1184CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Labidi-Galy SI et al (2018) Location of mutation in BRCA2 gene and survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24(2):326–333CrossRefPubMed Labidi-Galy SI et al (2018) Location of mutation in BRCA2 gene and survival in patients with ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res 24(2):326–333CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kotsopoulos J et al (2018) BRCA mutation status is not associated with increased hematologic toxicity among patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed Kotsopoulos J et al (2018) BRCA mutation status is not associated with increased hematologic toxicity among patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy for ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 28(1):69–76CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dhawan MS et al (2017) Differential toxicity in patients with and without DNA repair mutations: phase I study of carboplatin and talazoparib in advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 23:6400–6410CrossRefPubMed Dhawan MS et al (2017) Differential toxicity in patients with and without DNA repair mutations: phase I study of carboplatin and talazoparib in advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 23:6400–6410CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Drost R et al (2011) BRCA1 RING function is essential for tumor suppression but dispensable for therapy resistance. Cancer Cell 20(6):797–809CrossRefPubMed Drost R et al (2011) BRCA1 RING function is essential for tumor suppression but dispensable for therapy resistance. Cancer Cell 20(6):797–809CrossRefPubMed
27.
29.
go back to reference Le Deley MC et al (2007) Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, radiotherapy, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: risk factors for leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):292–300CrossRefPubMed Le Deley MC et al (2007) Anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, radiotherapy, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: risk factors for leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome after breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(3):292–300CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Coombs CC et al (2017) Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis in patients with non-hematologic cancers is common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Cell Stem Cell 21(3):374–382 e4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coombs CC et al (2017) Therapy-related clonal hematopoiesis in patients with non-hematologic cancers is common and associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Cell Stem Cell 21(3):374–382 e4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Iqbal J et al (2016) The incidence of leukaemia in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: an International Prospective Cohort Study. Br J Cancer 114(10):1160–1164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Iqbal J et al (2016) The incidence of leukaemia in women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: an International Prospective Cohort Study. Br J Cancer 114(10):1160–1164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Sucheston LE et al (2011) Genetic predictors of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in a SWOG phase III intergroup adjuvant breast cancer treatment trial (S0221). Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(3):993–1002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sucheston LE et al (2011) Genetic predictors of taxane-induced neurotoxicity in a SWOG phase III intergroup adjuvant breast cancer treatment trial (S0221). Breast Cancer Res Treat 130(3):993–1002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Shah A et al (2018) Incidence and disease burden of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in a population-based cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 89(6):636–641CrossRefPubMed Shah A et al (2018) Incidence and disease burden of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in a population-based cohort. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 89(6):636–641CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference D’Argenio V et al (2015) The molecular analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: Next-generation sequencing supersedes conventional approaches. Clin Chim Acta 446:221–225CrossRefPubMed D’Argenio V et al (2015) The molecular analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2: Next-generation sequencing supersedes conventional approaches. Clin Chim Acta 446:221–225CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
BRCA1/BRCA2 germline mutations and chemotherapy-related hematological toxicity in breast cancer patients
Authors
Alex Friedlaender
Aurélie Vuilleumier
Valeria Viassolo
Aurélie Ayme
Solène De Talhouet
Jean-Damien Combes
Julien Peron
Alexandre Bodmer
Sophie Giraud
Adrien Buisson
Valerie Bonadona
Isabelle Gauchat-Bouchardy
Olivier Tredan
Pierre O. Chappuis
S. Intidhar Labidi-Galy
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05127-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2019 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine