Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018

01-06-2018 | Clinical study

Lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly associated with poor prognosis in breast carcinoma

Authors: Anne-Sophie Hamy, Giang-Thanh Lam, Enora Laas, Lauren Darrigues, Thomas Balezeau, Julien Guerin, Alain Livartowski, Benjamin Sadacca, Jean-Yves Pierga, Anne Vincent-Salomon, Florence Coussy, Veronique Becette, Hélène Bonsang-Kitzis, Roman Rouzier, Jean-Guillaume Feron, Gabriel Benchimol, Marick Laé, Fabien Reyal

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Few studies evaluated the prognostic value of the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer (BC).

Methods

The association between LVI and survival was evaluated in a cohort of BC patients treated by NAC between 2002 and 2011. Five post-NAC prognostic scores (ypAJCC, RCB, CPS, CPS + EG and Neo-Bioscore) were evaluated and compared with or without the addition of LVI.

Results

Out of 1033 tumors, LVI was present on surgical specimens in 29.2% and absent in 70.8% of the cases. Post-NAC LVI was associated with impaired disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 2.54; 95% CI 1.96–3.31; P < 0.001), and the magnitude of this effect depended on BC subtype (Pinteraction = 0.003), (luminal BC: HR 1.83; P = 0.003; triple negative BC: HR 3.73; P < 0.001; HER2-positive BC: HR 6.21; P < 0.001). Post-NAC LVI was an independent predictor of local relapse, distant metastasis, and overall survival; and increased the accuracy of all five post-NAC prognostic scoring systems.

Conclusions

Post-NAC LVI is a strong independent prognostic factor that: (i) should be systematically reported in pathology reports; (ii) should be used as stratification factor after NAC to propose inclusion in second-line trials or adjuvant treatment; (iii) should be included in post-NAC scoring systems.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Ravdin PM (1996) A computer program to assist in making breast cancer adjuvant therapy decisions. Semin Oncol 23:43–50PubMed Ravdin PM (1996) A computer program to assist in making breast cancer adjuvant therapy decisions. Semin Oncol 23:43–50PubMed
7.
go back to reference NCCN Evidence Blocks, TM (2016) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) - Breast Cancer., 2016 NCCN Evidence Blocks, TM (2016) NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) - Breast Cancer., 2016
8.
go back to reference Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A et al (2015) Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 26:1533–1546. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv221 CrossRef Coates AS, Winer EP, Goldhirsch A et al (2015) Tailoring therapies–improving the management of early breast cancer: St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2015. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 26:1533–1546. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1093/​annonc/​mdv221 CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, et al (2009) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn Edge S, Byrd D, Compton C, et al (2009) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, 7th edn
15.
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing
24.
Metadata
Title
Lymphovascular invasion after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is strongly associated with poor prognosis in breast carcinoma
Authors
Anne-Sophie Hamy
Giang-Thanh Lam
Enora Laas
Lauren Darrigues
Thomas Balezeau
Julien Guerin
Alain Livartowski
Benjamin Sadacca
Jean-Yves Pierga
Anne Vincent-Salomon
Florence Coussy
Veronique Becette
Hélène Bonsang-Kitzis
Roman Rouzier
Jean-Guillaume Feron
Gabriel Benchimol
Marick Laé
Fabien Reyal
Publication date
01-06-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4610-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine