Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018

Open Access 01-02-2018 | Clinical trial

Ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with de novo HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial

Authors: Joyce O’Shaughnessy, Katarina Petrakova, Gabe S. Sonke, Pierfranco Conte, Carlos L. Arteaga, David A. Cameron, Lowell L. Hart, Cristian Villanueva, Erik Jakobsen, Joseph T. Beck, Deborah Lindquist, Farida Souami, Shoubhik Mondal, Caroline Germa, Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Determine the efficacy and safety of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer.

Methods

Postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2− advanced breast cancer and no prior systemic therapy for advanced disease were enrolled in the Phase III MONALEESA-2 trial (NCT01958021). Patients were randomized to ribociclib (600 mg/day; 3 weeks-on/1 week-off) plus letrozole (2.5 mg/day; continuous) or placebo plus letrozole until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or treatment discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival; predefined subgroup analysis evaluated progression-free survival in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer. Secondary endpoints included safety and overall response rate.

Results

Six hundred and sixty-eight patients were enrolled, of whom 227 patients (34%; ribociclib plus letrozole vs placebo plus letrozole arm: n = 114 vs. n = 113) presented with de novo advanced breast cancer. Median progression-free survival was not reached in the ribociclib plus letrozole arm versus 16.4 months in the placebo plus letrozole arm in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer (hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.27–0.75). The most common Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and leukopenia; incidence rates were similar to those observed in the full MONALEESA-2 population. Ribociclib dose interruptions and reductions in patients with de novo disease occurred at similar frequencies to the overall study population.

Conclusions

Ribociclib plus letrozole improved progression-free survival vs placebo plus letrozole and was well tolerated in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− de novo advanced breast cancer.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hosford SR, Miller TW (2014) Clinical potential of novel therapeutic targets in breast cancer: CDK4/6, src, JAK/STAT, PARP, HDAC, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Pharmgenom Pers Med 7:203–215 Hosford SR, Miller TW (2014) Clinical potential of novel therapeutic targets in breast cancer: CDK4/6, src, JAK/STAT, PARP, HDAC, and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. Pharmgenom Pers Med 7:203–215
4.
go back to reference Miao H, Hartman M, Bhoo-Pathy N et al (2014) Predicting survival of de novo metastatic breast cancer in Asian women: systematic review and validation study. PLOS ONE 9:e93755CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miao H, Hartman M, Bhoo-Pathy N et al (2014) Predicting survival of de novo metastatic breast cancer in Asian women: systematic review and validation study. PLOS ONE 9:e93755CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E et al (2017) 3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 3). Ann Oncol 28:16–33CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E et al (2017) 3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 3). Ann Oncol 28:16–33CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E et al (2017) 3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 3). Breast 31:244–259CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, Costa A, Senkus E et al (2017) 3rd ESO-ESMO international consensus guidelines for advanced breast cancer (ABC 3). Breast 31:244–259CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rugo HS, Rumble RB, Macrae E et al (2016) Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:3069–3103CrossRefPubMed Rugo HS, Rumble RB, Macrae E et al (2016) Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline. J Clin Oncol 34:3069–3103CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Martin M, Lopez-Tarruella S, Gilarranz YJ (2016) Endocrine therapy for hormone treatment-naive advanced breast cancer. Breast 28:161–166CrossRefPubMed Martin M, Lopez-Tarruella S, Gilarranz YJ (2016) Endocrine therapy for hormone treatment-naive advanced breast cancer. Breast 28:161–166CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC et al (2015) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 112:1445–1451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lobbezoo DJ, van Kampen RJ, Voogd AC et al (2015) Prognosis of metastatic breast cancer: are there differences between patients with de novo and recurrent metastatic breast cancer. Br J Cancer 112:1445–1451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2010) Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:2169–2174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dawood S, Broglio K, Ensor J, Hortobagyi GN, Giordano SH (2010) Survival differences among women with de novo stage IV and relapsed breast cancer. Ann Oncol 21:2169–2174CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Brufsky A et al (2014) Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:725–734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yardley DA, Kaufman PA, Brufsky A et al (2014) Treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for patients with de novo versus recurrent HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 145:725–734CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490:61–70CrossRef Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 490:61–70CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Thangavel C, Dean JL, Ertel A et al (2011) Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 18:333–345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thangavel C, Dean JL, Ertel A et al (2011) Therapeutically activating RB: reestablishing cell cycle control in endocrine therapy-resistant breast cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 18:333–345CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Kim S, Loo A, Chopra R et al (2013) LEE011: an orally bioavailable, selective small molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6–reactivating Rb in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 12:Abstract PR02CrossRef Kim S, Loo A, Chopra R et al (2013) LEE011: an orally bioavailable, selective small molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6reactivating Rb in cancer. Mol Cancer Ther 12:Abstract PR02CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA et al (2016) Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1738–1748CrossRefPubMed Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA et al (2016) Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1738–1748CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS et al (2016) Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1925–1936CrossRefPubMed Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS et al (2016) Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1925–1936CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E et al (2016) Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, Phase III trial. Lancet 388:2997–3005CrossRefPubMed Robertson JFR, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E et al (2016) Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, Phase III trial. Lancet 388:2997–3005CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I et al (2016) Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, Phase II randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17:425–439CrossRefPubMed Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I et al (2016) Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, Phase II randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17:425–439CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Finn R, Jiang Y, Rugo H et al (2016) Biomarker analyses from the Phase III PALOMA-2 trial of palbociclib (P) with letrozole (L) compared with placebo (PLB) plus L in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). Ann Oncol 27(suppl 6):Abstract LBA15 Finn R, Jiang Y, Rugo H et al (2016) Biomarker analyses from the Phase III PALOMA-2 trial of palbociclib (P) with letrozole (L) compared with placebo (PLB) plus L in postmenopausal women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (ABC). Ann Oncol 27(suppl 6):Abstract LBA15
25.
go back to reference Asghar U, Witkiewicz AK, Turner NC, Knudsen ES (2015) The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:130–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Asghar U, Witkiewicz AK, Turner NC, Knudsen ES (2015) The history and future of targeting cyclin-dependent kinases in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Drug Discov 14:130–146CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with de novo HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial
Authors
Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Katarina Petrakova
Gabe S. Sonke
Pierfranco Conte
Carlos L. Arteaga
David A. Cameron
Lowell L. Hart
Cristian Villanueva
Erik Jakobsen
Joseph T. Beck
Deborah Lindquist
Farida Souami
Shoubhik Mondal
Caroline Germa
Gabriel N. Hortobagyi
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4518-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine