Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017

Open Access 01-11-2017 | Epidemiology

Tamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with 70-gene signature high and low risk

Authors: Laura J. van ‘t Veer, Christina Yau, Nancy Y. Yu, Christopher C. Benz, Bo Nordenskjöld, Tommy Fornander, Olle Stål, Laura J. Esserman, Linda Sofie Lindström

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Breast cancer molecular prognostic tools that predict recurrence risk have mainly been established on endocrine-treated patients and thus are not optimal for the evaluation of benefit from endocrine therapy. The Stockholm tamoxifen (STO-3) trial which randomized postmenopausal node-negative patients to 2-year tamoxifen (followed by an optional randomization for an additional 3-year tamoxifen vs nil), versus no adjuvant treatment, provides a unique opportunity to evaluate long-term 20-year benefit of endocrine therapy within prognostic risk classes of the 70-gene prognosis signature that was developed on adjuvantly untreated patients.

Methods

We assessed by Kaplan–Meier analysis 20-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 10-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) for 538 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, STO-3 trial patients with retrospectively ascertained 70-gene prognosis classification. Multivariable analysis of long-term (20 years) BCSS by STO-3 trial arm in the 70-gene high-risk and low-risk subgroups was performed using Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusting for classical patient and tumor characteristics.

Results

Tamoxifen-treated, 70-gene low- and high-risk patients had 20-year BCSS of 90 and 83%, as compared to 80 and 65% for untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001). Notably, there is equivalent tamoxifen benefit in both high (HR 0.42 (0.21–0.86), p = 0.018) and low (HR 0.46 (0.25–0.85), p = 0.013) 70-gene risk categories even after adjusting for clinico-pathological factors for BCSS. Limited tamoxifen exposure as given in the STO-3 trial provides persistent benefit for 10–15 years after diagnosis in a time-varying analysis. 10-year DMFS was 93 and 85% for low- and high-risk tamoxifen-treated, versus 83 and 70% for low- and high-risk untreated patients, respectively (log-rank p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Patients with ER-positive breast cancer, regardless of high or low 70-gene risk classification, receive significant survival benefit lasting over 10 years from adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, even when given for a relatively short duration.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN et al (2016) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 34:927–935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Colleoni M, Sun Z, Price KN et al (2016) Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer during 24 years of follow-up: results from the international breast cancer study group trials I to V. J Clin Oncol 34:927–935CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jirstrom K, Ryden L, Anagnostaki L et al (2005) Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomized premenopausal breast cancer trial. J Clin Path 58:1135–1142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jirstrom K, Ryden L, Anagnostaki L et al (2005) Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomized premenopausal breast cancer trial. J Clin Path 58:1135–1142CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Sheppard VB, Faul LA, Luta G et al (2014) Frailty and adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in older women with breast cancer: CALGB protocol 369901. J Clin Oncol 32:2318–2327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sheppard VB, Faul LA, Luta G et al (2014) Frailty and adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in older women with breast cancer: CALGB protocol 369901. J Clin Oncol 32:2318–2327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patters of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patters of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:10869–10874CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486:346–352PubMedPubMedCentral Curtis C, Shah SP, Chin SF et al (2012) The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature 486:346–352PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Eng J Med 360:790–800CrossRef Sotiriou C, Pusztai L (2009) Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Eng J Med 360:790–800CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:2817–2826CrossRefPubMed Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:2817–2826CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J et al (2016) 70-Gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729CrossRefPubMed Cardoso F, van’t Veer LJ, Bogaerts J et al (2016) 70-Gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375:717–729CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef van’t Veer LJ, Dai H, van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature 415:530–536CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jerevall PL, Ma XJ, Li H et al (2011) Prognostic utility of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index in early-stage breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial. Br J Cancer 104:1762–1769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jerevall PL, Ma XJ, Li H et al (2011) Prognostic utility of HOXB13:IL17BR and molecular grade index in early-stage breast cancer patients from the Stockholm trial. Br J Cancer 104:1762–1769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference McShane L, Altman D, Saurerbrei W et al (2006) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235CrossRefPubMed McShane L, Altman D, Saurerbrei W et al (2006) Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Larsson LG, Nystrom L, Wall S et al (1996) The Swedish randomised mammography screening trials: analysis of their effect on the breast cancer related excess mortality. J Med Screen 3:129–132CrossRefPubMed Larsson LG, Nystrom L, Wall S et al (1996) The Swedish randomised mammography screening trials: analysis of their effect on the breast cancer related excess mortality. J Med Screen 3:129–132CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rutqvist LE (1985) Validity of certified causes of death in breast carcinoma patients. Acta Radiol Oncol 24:385–390CrossRefPubMed Rutqvist LE (1985) Validity of certified causes of death in breast carcinoma patients. Acta Radiol Oncol 24:385–390CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talback M (2009) The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 48:27–33CrossRefPubMed Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talback M (2009) The completeness of the Swedish Cancer Register: a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 48:27–33CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Beumer I, Witteveen A, Delahaye L et al (2016) Equivalence of MammaPrint array types in clinical trials and diagnostics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156:279–287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beumer I, Witteveen A, Delahaye L et al (2016) Equivalence of MammaPrint array types in clinical trials and diagnostics. Breast Cancer Res Treat 156:279–287CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
20.
go back to reference Lambert PC, Royston P (2009) Further developments of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. Stata J 9:265–290 Lambert PC, Royston P (2009) Further developments of flexible parametric models for survival analysis. Stata J 9:265–290
21.
go back to reference Royston P, Parmar MK (2002) Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med 21:2175–2197CrossRefPubMed Royston P, Parmar MK (2002) Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med 21:2175–2197CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R et al (2011) A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Research 17:6012–6020CrossRef Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R et al (2011) A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Research 17:6012–6020CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21- gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65CrossRefPubMed Albain KS, Barlow WE, Shak S et al (2010) Prognostic and predictive value of the 21- gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 11:55–65CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomized trials. Lancet 365:1687–1717CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Krop I, Ismaila N, Andre F et al (2017) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.74.0472 PubMed Krop I, Ismaila N, Andre F et al (2017) Use of biomarkers to guide decisions on adjuvant systemic therapy for women with early-stage invasive breast cancer: American Society of Clinical oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2017.​74.​0472 PubMed
Metadata
Title
Tamoxifen therapy benefit for patients with 70-gene signature high and low risk
Authors
Laura J. van ‘t Veer
Christina Yau
Nancy Y. Yu
Christopher C. Benz
Bo Nordenskjöld
Tommy Fornander
Olle Stål
Laura J. Esserman
Linda Sofie Lindström
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4428-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine