Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017

01-09-2017 | Review

Reassessing risk models for atypical hyperplasia: age may not matter

Authors: Emanuele Mazzola, Suzanne B. Coopey, Molly Griffin, Fernanda Polubriaginof, Julliette M. Buckley, Giovanni Parmigiani, Judy E. Garber, Barbara L. Smith, Michele A. Gadd, Michelle C. Specht, Anthony Guidi, Kevin S. Hughes

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of age at diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia (“atypia”, ductal [ADH], lobular [ALH], or severe ADH) on the risk of developing subsequent invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods

Using standard survival analysis methods, we retrospectively analyzed 1353 women not treated with chemoprevention among a cohort of 2370 women diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia to determine the risk relationship between age at diagnosis and subsequent breast cancer.

Results

For all atypia diagnoses combined, our cohort showed a 5-, 10-, and 15-year risk of invasive breast cancer or DCIS of 0.56, 1.25, and 1.30, respectively, with no significant difference in the (65,75] year age group. For women aged (35,75] years, we observed no significant difference in the 15-year risk of invasive breast cancer or DCIS after atypical hyperplasia, although the baseline risk for a 40-year-old woman is approximately 1/8 the risk of a 70-year-old woman. The risks associated with invasive breast cancer or DCIS for women in our cohort diagnosed with ADH, severe ADH, or ALH, regardless of age, were 7.6% (95% CI 5.9–9.3%) at 5 years, 25.1% (20.7–29.2%) at 10 years, and 40.1% (32.8–46.6%) at 15 years.

Conclusion

In contrast to current risk prediction models (e.g., Gail, Tyrer-Cuzick) which assume that the risk of developing breast cancer increases in relation to age at diagnosis of atypia, we found the 15-year cancer risk in our cohort was not significantly different for women between the ages of 35 (excluded) and 75. This implies that the “hits” received by the breast tissue along the “high-risk pathway” to cancer might possibly supersede other factors such as age.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312(3):146–151CrossRefPubMed Dupont WD, Page DL (1985) Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 312(3):146–151CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2007) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(3):229–237CrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH et al (2007) Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353(3):229–237CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2671–2677CrossRefPubMed Degnim AC, Visscher DW, Berman HK et al (2007) Stratification of breast cancer risk in women with atypia: a Mayo Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 25(19):2671–2677CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Choi DX, Eaton AA, Olcese C et al (2013) Blurry boundaries: do epithelial borderline lesions of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ have similar rates of subsequent invasive cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20:1302–1310CrossRefPubMed Choi DX, Eaton AA, Olcese C et al (2013) Blurry boundaries: do epithelial borderline lesions of the breast and ductal carcinoma in situ have similar rates of subsequent invasive cancer? Ann Surg Oncol 20:1302–1310CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM et al (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia. Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109(2):180–187CrossRefPubMed Collins LC, Baer HJ, Tamimi RM et al (2007) Magnitude and laterality of breast cancer risk according to histologic type of atypical hyperplasia. Results from the Nurses’ Health Study. Cancer 109(2):180–187CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Marshall LM, Hunter DJ, Connolly JL et al (1997) Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 6:297–301 Marshall LM, Hunter DJ, Connolly JL et al (1997) Risk of breast cancer associated with atypical hyperplasia of lobular and ductal types. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 6:297–301
7.
go back to reference Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA et al (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137(7):1053–1060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou WB, Xue DQ, Liu XA et al (2011) The influence of family history and histological stratification on breast cancer risk in women with benign breast disease: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137(7):1053–1060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136:627–633CrossRefPubMed Coopey SB, Mazzola E, Buckley JM et al (2012) The role of chemoprevention in modifying the risk of breast cancer in women with atypical breast lesions. Breast Cancer Res Treat 136:627–633CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC et al (1993) The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(11):892–897CrossRefPubMed Feuer EJ, Wun LM, Boring CC et al (1993) The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 85(11):892–897CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886CrossRefPubMed Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP et al (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23:1111–1130CrossRefPubMed Tyrer J, Duffy SW, Cuzick J (2004) A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors. Stat Med 23:1111–1130CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Radisky DC, Frost MH et al (2014) Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study. Cancer Prev Res 7:211–217CrossRef Hartmann LC, Radisky DC, Frost MH et al (2014) Understanding the premalignant potential of atypical hyperplasia through its natural history: a longitudinal cohort study. Cancer Prev Res 7:211–217CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E et al (2013) Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 31:1–22CrossRef Visvanathan K, Hurley P, Bantug E et al (2013) Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol 31:1–22CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314 Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) A language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5(3):299–314
Metadata
Title
Reassessing risk models for atypical hyperplasia: age may not matter
Authors
Emanuele Mazzola
Suzanne B. Coopey
Molly Griffin
Fernanda Polubriaginof
Julliette M. Buckley
Giovanni Parmigiani
Judy E. Garber
Barbara L. Smith
Michele A. Gadd
Michelle C. Specht
Anthony Guidi
Kevin S. Hughes
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-017-4320-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2017 Go to the issue

Rebuttal Letter

Response Letter

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine