Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017

Open Access 01-01-2017 | Clinical trial

A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PELICAN study

Authors: Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Saupe, Elke Jäger, Marcus Schmidt, Rolf Kreienberg, Lothar Müller, Burkhard Joerg Otremba, Dirk Waldenmaier, Julia Dorn, Mathias Warm, Michael Scholz, Michael Untch, Maike de Wit, Jana Barinoff, Hans-Joachim Lück, Philipp Harter, Doris Augustin, Paul Harnett, Matthias W. Beckmann, Salah-Eddin Al-Batran, On behalf of the PELICAN Investigators

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The PELICAN trial evaluates for the first time efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Methods

This randomized, phase III, open-label, multicenter trial enrolled first-line MBC patients who were ineligible for endocrine or trastuzumab therapy. Cumulative adjuvant anthracyclines of 360 mg/m2 doxorubicin or equivalent were allowed. Left ventricular ejection fraction of >50 % was required. Patients received PLD 50 mg/m2 every 28 days or capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 14 days every 21 days. The primary endpoint was time-to-disease progression (TTP).

Results

210 patients were randomized (n = 105, PLD and n = 105, capecitabine). Adjuvant anthracyclines were given to 37 % (PLD) and 36 % (capecitabine) of patients. No significant difference was observed in TTP [HR = 1.21 (95 % confidence interval, 0.838–1.750)]. Median TTP was 6.0 months for both PLD and capecitabine. Comparing patients with or without prior anthracyclines, no significant difference in TTP was observed in the PLD arm (log-rank P = 0.64). For PLD versus capecitabine, respectively, overall survival (median, 23.3 months vs. 26.8 months) and time-to-treatment failure (median, 4.6 months vs. 3.7 months) were not statistically significantly different. Compared to PLD, patients on capecitabine experienced more serious adverse events (P = 0.015) and more cardiac events among patients who had prior anthracycline exposure (18 vs. 8 %; P = 0.31).

Conclusion

Both PLD and capecitabine are effective first-line agents for MBC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Dimopoulos MA et al (2009) A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:87–99CrossRefPubMed Fountzilas G, Dafni U, Dimopoulos MA et al (2009) A randomized phase III study comparing three anthracycline-free taxane-based regimens, as first line chemotherapy, in metastatic breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:87–99CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Martín M, Ruiz A, Muñoz M et al (2007) Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol 8:219–225CrossRefPubMed Martín M, Ruiz A, Muñoz M et al (2007) Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol 8:219–225CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Joensuu H, Holli K, Heikkinen M et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 16:3720–3730PubMed Joensuu H, Holli K, Heikkinen M et al (1998) Combination chemotherapy versus single-agent therapy as first- and second-line treatment in metastatic breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 16:3720–3730PubMed
4.
go back to reference Carrick S, Parker S, Thornton CE et al (2009) Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.1002/14651858 PubMed Carrick S, Parker S, Thornton CE et al (2009) Single agent versus combination chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. doi:10.​1002/​14651858 PubMed
5.
go back to reference Keller AM, Mennel RG, Georgoulias VA et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3893–3901CrossRefPubMed Keller AM, Mennel RG, Georgoulias VA et al (2004) Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3893–3901CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference O’Brien MER, Wigler N, Inbar M et al (2004) Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX™/Doxil®) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15:440–449CrossRefPubMed O’Brien MER, Wigler N, Inbar M et al (2004) Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX™/Doxil®) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 15:440–449CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Talbot DC, Moiseyenko V, Van Belle S et al (2002) Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Br J Cancer 86:1367–1372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Talbot DC, Moiseyenko V, Van Belle S et al (2002) Randomised, phase II trial comparing oral capecitabine (Xeloda®) with paclitaxel in patients with metastatic/advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Br J Cancer 86:1367–1372CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference O’Shaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V et al (2001) Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 12:1247–1254CrossRef O’Shaughnessy JA, Blum J, Moiseyenko V et al (2001) Randomized, open-label, phase II trial of oral capecitabine (Xeloda) vs. a reference arm of intravenous CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) as first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol 12:1247–1254CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU et al (1999) Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:485–493PubMed Blum JL, Jones SE, Buzdar AU et al (1999) Multicenter phase II study of capecitabine in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 17:485–493PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hanf V, Schütz F, Liedtke C, Thill M (2014) AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Care 9(3):202–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hanf V, Schütz F, Liedtke C, Thill M (2014) AGO recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Care 9(3):202–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34:1274–1281CrossRefPubMed Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M et al (1998) Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer 34:1274–1281CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Nat Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Nat Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:360–376CrossRef Aaronson N, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:360–376CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139–144PubMed Osoba D, Rodrigues G, Myles J et al (1998) Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. J Clin Oncol 16:139–144PubMed
16.
go back to reference Bajetta E, Procopio G, Celio L et al (2005) Safety and efficacy of two different doses of capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in older women. J Clin Oncol 23:2155–2161CrossRefPubMed Bajetta E, Procopio G, Celio L et al (2005) Safety and efficacy of two different doses of capecitabine in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in older women. J Clin Oncol 23:2155–2161CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ranson MR, Carmichael J, O’Byrne K, Stewart S, Smith D, Howell A (1997) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 15:3185–3191PubMed Ranson MR, Carmichael J, O’Byrne K, Stewart S, Smith D, Howell A (1997) Treatment of advanced breast cancer with sterically stabilized liposomal doxorubicin: results of a multicenter phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 15:3185–3191PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lyass O, Uziely B, Ben-Yosef R, Tzemach D, Heshing NI, Lotem M, Brufman G, Gabizon A (2000) Correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 89:1037–1049CrossRefPubMed Lyass O, Uziely B, Ben-Yosef R, Tzemach D, Heshing NI, Lotem M, Brufman G, Gabizon A (2000) Correlation of toxicity with pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) in metastatic breast carcinoma. Cancer 89:1037–1049CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yardley DA, Shipley DM, Greco FA et al (2004) Phase II randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. weekly docetaxel with subsequent crossover as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:S203 Yardley DA, Shipley DM, Greco FA et al (2004) Phase II randomized trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. weekly docetaxel with subsequent crossover as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 88:S203
21.
go back to reference Minea LN, Stanculeanu DL, Cringeanu A, Anghel RM (2004) Capecitabine monotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(14):S797 Minea LN, Stanculeanu DL, Cringeanu A, Anghel RM (2004) Capecitabine monotherapy for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22(14):S797
22.
23.
go back to reference El-Helw L, Coleman RE (2005) Reduced dose capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast 14:368–374CrossRefPubMed El-Helw L, Coleman RE (2005) Reduced dose capecitabine is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Breast 14:368–374CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Smorenburg CH, de Groot SM, van Leeuwen-Stok AE et al (2014) A randomized phase III study comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the OMEGA study of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group BOOG. Ann Oncol 25(3):599–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Smorenburg CH, de Groot SM, van Leeuwen-Stok AE et al (2014) A randomized phase III study comparing pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer: results of the OMEGA study of the Dutch Breast Cancer Research Group BOOG. Ann Oncol 25(3):599–605CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Hamaker ME, Seynaeve C, Wymenga AN et al (2014) Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment is associated with toxicity and survival in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy: results from the OMEGA study of the Dutch breast cancer trialists’ group. Breast 23:81–87CrossRefPubMed Hamaker ME, Seynaeve C, Wymenga AN et al (2014) Baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment is associated with toxicity and survival in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients receiving single-agent chemotherapy: results from the OMEGA study of the Dutch breast cancer trialists’ group. Breast 23:81–87CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Kaufmann M, Maass N, Costa SD et al (2010) First-line therapy with moderate dose capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer is safe and active: results of the MONICA trial. Eur J Cancer 46:3184–3191CrossRefPubMed Kaufmann M, Maass N, Costa SD et al (2010) First-line therapy with moderate dose capecitabine in metastatic breast cancer is safe and active: results of the MONICA trial. Eur J Cancer 46:3184–3191CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus capecitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer: results of the PELICAN study
Authors
Nadia Harbeck
Steffen Saupe
Elke Jäger
Marcus Schmidt
Rolf Kreienberg
Lothar Müller
Burkhard Joerg Otremba
Dirk Waldenmaier
Julia Dorn
Mathias Warm
Michael Scholz
Michael Untch
Maike de Wit
Jana Barinoff
Hans-Joachim Lück
Philipp Harter
Doris Augustin
Paul Harnett
Matthias W. Beckmann
Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
On behalf of the PELICAN Investigators
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-4033-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine