Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016

01-11-2016 | Epidemiology

Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States

Authors: Mark Sisco, Alexandra M. Kyrillos, Brittany R. Lapin, Chihsiung E. Wang, Katharine A. Yao

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

For many women, nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) provides aesthetic and quality-of-life outcomes superior to skin-sparing mastectomy. Accumulating data suggest that NSM provides similar oncologic outcomes in select breast cancer patients. This study sought to determine national trends in NSM use.

Methods

Using the National Cancer Data Base, 6254 women with breast cancer who underwent NSM between 2010 and 2013 were identified. NSM rates were determined relative to the number of patients who received a mastectomy with reconstruction (n = 114,849). Associations between patient, tumor, and facility characteristics and NSM were assessed using logistic regression.

Results

The rate of NSM increased from 2.9 to 8.0 % between 2010 and 2013. NSM was most commonly performed in academic (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.43, p < 0.001) and high-volume (OR 1.59, p < 0.001) breast centers. There was up to a 5.8-fold variation in its delivery between geographic census regions (p < 0.001). Of 1231 hospitals, only 491 (39.9 %) reported performing at least one NSM during the study period. Half of all NSMs were performed by the top 6 % (n = 30) of NSM-performing centers. NSM was associated with small tumor size (p < 0.001), lower tumor grades (p < 0.05), and negative nodal status (p < 0.001). However, half of NSM patients had at least one tumor characteristic that diverged from current (2016) NCCN recommendations for the procedure.

Conclusions

The use of therapeutic NSM is increasing dramatically in the United States, despite recommendations that the procedure be used with caution. As NSM becomes increasingly common, efforts are needed to monitor its long-term oncologic outcomes and to ensure equitable access to it.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36(15):1938–1943CrossRefPubMed Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36(15):1938–1943CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, Santillo B, Luini A, Galimberti V, Scaffidi E et al (2009) Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat 118(3):623–633CrossRefPubMed Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, Bedolis R, Rotmensz N, Maldifassi A, Santillo B, Luini A, Galimberti V, Scaffidi E et al (2009) Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat 118(3):623–633CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, Virani S, Narod S, Pal T (2015) Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3324–3330CrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA, Cil TD, Semple JL, Li LD, Bagher S, Zhong T, Virani S, Narod S, Pal T (2015) Long-term psychosocial functioning in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: does preservation of the nipple-areolar complex make a difference? Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3324–3330CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sisco M, Yao KA (2016) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol 113(8):883–890CrossRefPubMed Sisco M, Yao KA (2016) Nipple-sparing mastectomy: a contemporary perspective. J Surg Oncol 113(8):883–890CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer (Version 2013.3) National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer (Version 2013.3)
6.
go back to reference Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Neumayer L, Agarwal JP (2014) Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy: trends based on a national cancer database. Am J Surg 208(1):93–98CrossRefPubMed Agarwal S, Agarwal S, Neumayer L, Agarwal JP (2014) Therapeutic nipple-sparing mastectomy: trends based on a national cancer database. Am J Surg 208(1):93–98CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Esserman LJ (2015) Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol 22(12):3803–3808CrossRefPubMed Amara D, Peled AW, Wang F, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Esserman LJ (2015) Tumor involvement of the nipple in total skin-sparing mastectomy: strategies for management. Ann Surg Oncol 22(12):3803–3808CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, Diaz Z, Robertson Y, Korourian S, Westbrook KC, Henry-Tillman RS, Klimberg VS (2011) Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 212(4):686–693 discussion 693–685 CrossRefPubMed Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, Diaz Z, Robertson Y, Korourian S, Westbrook KC, Henry-Tillman RS, Klimberg VS (2011) Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg 212(4):686–693 discussion 693–685 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the memorial sloan-kettering cancer center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3117–3122CrossRefPubMed de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, Morrow M, Pusic A, Sacchini VS (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the memorial sloan-kettering cancer center experience. Ann Surg Oncol 18(11):3117–3122CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, Rai U, Specht MC, Gadd MA, Colwell AS, Austen WG Jr, Brachtel EF, Smith BL (2016) Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg 222(6):1149–1155CrossRefPubMed Tang R, Coopey SB, Merrill AL, Rai U, Specht MC, Gadd MA, Colwell AS, Austen WG Jr, Brachtel EF, Smith BL (2016) Positive nipple margins in nipple-sparing mastectomies: rates, management, and oncologic safety. J Am Coll Surg 222(6):1149–1155CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM (2015) Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3241–3249CrossRef De La Cruz L, Moody AM, Tappy EE, Blankenship SA, Hecht EM (2015) Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, and nipple-areolar recurrence in the setting of nipple-sparing mastectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 22(10):3241–3249CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, Koerner FC (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27(30):4948–4954CrossRefPubMed Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, Chen LL, Muzikansky A, Smith BL, Koerner FC (2009) Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol 27(30):4948–4954CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg 143(11):1106–1110 discussion 1110 CrossRefPubMed Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, Djohan R (2008) Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg 143(11):1106–1110 discussion 1110 CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6(6):609–613CrossRefPubMed Laronga C, Kemp B, Johnston D, Robb GL, Singletary SE (1999) The incidence of occult nipple-areola complex involvement in breast cancer patients receiving a skin-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 6(6):609–613CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P (1987) Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 113(5):481–487CrossRefPubMed Luttges J, Kalbfleisch H, Prinz P (1987) Nipple involvement and multicentricity in breast cancer. A study on whole organ sections. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 113(5):481–487CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, Inoue K (1985) Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer 55(10):2459–2463CrossRefPubMed Morimoto T, Komaki K, Inui K, Umemoto A, Yamamoto H, Harada K, Inoue K (1985) Involvement of nipple and areola in early breast cancer. Cancer 55(10):2459–2463CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, Viale G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(2):333–338CrossRefPubMed Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Rey P, Martella S, Didier F, Viale G, Veronesi P, Luini A, Galimberti V et al (2009) Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European institute of oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat 117(2):333–338CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2008) Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 95(11):1356–1361CrossRefPubMed Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Othus M, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL (2008) Development and validation of a model predictive of occult nipple involvement in women undergoing mastectomy. Br J Surg 95(11):1356–1361CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9(2):165–168CrossRefPubMed Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, King V, Osborne M (2002) Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol 9(2):165–168CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, Hannan C, Seiboth L, Nahabedian MY (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1005–1014CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, Cocilovo C, Sidawy M, Al-Attar A, Hannan C, Seiboth L, Nahabedian MY (2011) Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(5):1005–1014CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z (2005) Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):240–244CrossRefPubMed Vlajcic Z, Zic R, Stanec S, Lambasa S, Petrovecki M, Stanec Z (2005) Nipple-areola complex preservation: predictive factors of neoplastic nipple-areola complex invasion. Ann Plast Surg 55(3):240–244CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS (1998) Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24(1):15–16CrossRefPubMed Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS (1998) Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 24(1):15–16CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Wang J, Xiao X, Wang J, Iqbal N, Baxter L, Skinner KA, Hicks DG, Hajdu SI, Tang P (2012) Predictors of nipple-areolar complex involvement by breast carcinoma: histopathologic analysis of 787 consecutive therapeutic mastectomy specimens. Ann Surg Oncol 19(4):1174–1180CrossRefPubMed Wang J, Xiao X, Wang J, Iqbal N, Baxter L, Skinner KA, Hicks DG, Hajdu SI, Tang P (2012) Predictors of nipple-areolar complex involvement by breast carcinoma: histopathologic analysis of 787 consecutive therapeutic mastectomy specimens. Ann Surg Oncol 19(4):1174–1180CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Wertheim U, Ozzello L (1980) Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 4(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed Wertheim U, Ozzello L (1980) Neoplastic involvement of nipple and skin flap in carcinoma of the breast. Am J Surg Pathol 4(6):543–549CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ (2008) Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 143(1):38–45CrossRefPubMed Wijayanayagam A, Kumar AS, Foster RD, Esserman LJ (2008) Optimizing the total skin-sparing mastectomy. Arch Surg 143(1):38–45CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, Gadgil PV, Das C, Henry-Tillman R, Ochoa D, Korourian S, Suzanne Klimberg V (2013) Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3294–3302CrossRefPubMed Burdge EC, Yuen J, Hardee M, Gadgil PV, Das C, Henry-Tillman R, Ochoa D, Korourian S, Suzanne Klimberg V (2013) Nipple skin-sparing mastectomy is feasible for advanced disease. Ann Surg Oncol 20(10):3294–3302CrossRefPubMed
27.
28.
go back to reference Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K (2012) Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg 215(5):658–666 discussion 666 CrossRefPubMed Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, Howard MA, Winchester DP, Yao K (2012) Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the national cancer data base. J Am Coll Surg 215(5):658–666 discussion 666 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Facility oncology registry data standards (2016) American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, Chicago Facility oncology registry data standards (2016) American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer, Chicago
30.
go back to reference Allison P (2005) Imputation of categorical variables with PROC MI. In: SUGI 30 Proceedings, vol. paper 113–30, Philadelphia Allison P (2005) Imputation of categorical variables with PROC MI. In: SUGI 30 Proceedings, vol. paper 113–30, Philadelphia
31.
go back to reference National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology: BREAST cancer (Version 2016.1) National comprehensive cancer network clinical practice guidelines in oncology: BREAST cancer (Version 2016.1)
32.
go back to reference Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS (1992) Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326(17):1102–1107CrossRefPubMed Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS (1992) Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 326(17):1102–1107CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Trends and variation in the use of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer in the United States
Authors
Mark Sisco
Alexandra M. Kyrillos
Brittany R. Lapin
Chihsiung E. Wang
Katharine A. Yao
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3975-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine