Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016

Open Access 01-10-2016 | Epidemiology

Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women

Authors: Lotte E. Elshof, Michael Schaapveld, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Emiel J. Rutgers, Flora E. van Leeuwen, Jelle Wesseling

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effect of different treatment strategies on the risk of subsequent invasive breast cancer (IBC) in women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Methods

Up to 15-year cumulative incidences of ipsilateral IBC (iIBC) and contralateral IBC (cIBC) were assessed among a population-based cohort of 10,090 women treated for DCIS in the Netherlands between 1989 and 2004. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations of treatment with iIBC risk.

Results

Fifteen years after DCIS diagnosis, cumulative incidence of iIBC was 1.9 % after mastectomy, 8.8 % after BCS+RT, and 15.4 % after BCS alone. Patients treated with BCS alone had a higher iIBC risk than those treated with BCS+RT during the first 5 years after treatment. This difference was less pronounced for patients <50 years [hazard ratio (HR) 2.11, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.35–3.29 for women <50, and HR 4.44, 95 % CI 3.11–6.36 for women ≥50, P interaction  < 0.0001]. Beyond 5 years of follow-up, iIBC risk did not differ between patients treated with BCS+RT or BCS alone for women <50. Cumulative incidence of cIBC at 15 years was 6.4 %, compared to 3.4 % in the general population.

Conclusions

We report an interaction of treatment with age and follow-up period on iIBC risk, indicating that the benefit of RT seems to be smaller among younger women, and stressing the importance of clinical studies with long follow-up. Finally, the low cIBC risk does not justify contralateral prophylactic mastectomies for many women with unilateral DCIS.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE et al (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1546–1554CrossRefPubMed Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE et al (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1546–1554CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA et al (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0730-y CrossRefPubMed Vigeland E, Klaasen H, Klingen TA et al (2008) Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County study. Eur Radiol 18:183–191. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-007-0730-y CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bluekens AMJ, Holland R, Karssemeijer N et al (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 265:707–714. doi:10.1148/radiol.12111461 CrossRefPubMed Bluekens AMJ, Holland R, Karssemeijer N et al (2012) Comparison of digital screening mammography and screen-film mammography in the early detection of clinically relevant cancers: a multicenter study. Radiology 265:707–714. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​12111461 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010, National Cancer Institute Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010, National Cancer Institute
11.
go back to reference Boekel NB, Schaapveld M, Gietema JA et al (2014) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:156. doi:10.1093/jnci/dju156 CrossRef Boekel NB, Schaapveld M, Gietema JA et al (2014) Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst 106:156. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​dju156 CrossRef
12.
13.
go back to reference Ripping TM, Verbeek ALM, Fracheboud J et al (2015) Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer 137:921–929. doi:10.1002/ijc.29452 CrossRefPubMed Ripping TM, Verbeek ALM, Fracheboud J et al (2015) Overdiagnosis by mammographic screening for breast cancer studied in birth cohorts in The Netherlands. Int J Cancer 137:921–929. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​29452 CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Schouten van der Velden AP, van Vugt R, Van Dijck JAAM et al (2007) Local recurrences after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in the East Netherlands. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:703–710. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.03.062 CrossRefPubMed Schouten van der Velden AP, van Vugt R, Van Dijck JAAM et al (2007) Local recurrences after different treatment strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in the East Netherlands. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 69:703–710. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2007.​03.​062 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Wong JS, Chen Y-H, Gadd MA et al (2014) Eight-year update of a prospective study of wide excision alone for small low- or intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:343–350. doi:10.1007/s10549-013-2813-6 CrossRefPubMed Wong JS, Chen Y-H, Gadd MA et al (2014) Eight-year update of a prospective study of wide excision alone for small low- or intermediate-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Breast Cancer Res Treat 143:343–350. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-013-2813-6 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Donker M, Litière S, Werutsky G et al (2013) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4054–4059. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.49.5077 CrossRefPubMed Donker M, Litière S, Werutsky G et al (2013) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma in situ: 15-year recurrence rates and outcome after a recurrence, from the EORTC 10853 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 31:4054–4059. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2013.​49.​5077 CrossRefPubMed
26.
28.
go back to reference Casparie M, Tiebosch ATMG, Burger G et al (2007) Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol 29:19–24PubMedPubMedCentral Casparie M, Tiebosch ATMG, Burger G et al (2007) Pathology databanking and biobanking in The Netherlands, a central role for PALGA, the nationwide histopathology and cytopathology data network and archive. Cell Oncol 29:19–24PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:167–180PubMed Holland R, Peterse JL, Millis RR et al (1994) Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification. Semin Diagn Pathol 11:167–180PubMed
30.
go back to reference Fine JPG, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509CrossRef Fine JPG, Gray RJ (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 94:496–509CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ederer F, Heise H (1959) Instructions to Ibm 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Technical end results evaluation section. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda Ederer F, Heise H (1959) Instructions to Ibm 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Technical end results evaluation section. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
32.
35.
go back to reference Vicini FA, Recht A (2002) Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 20:2736–2744CrossRefPubMed Vicini FA, Recht A (2002) Age at diagnosis and outcome for women with ductal carcinoma-in situ of the breast: a critical review of the literature. J Clin Oncol 20:2736–2744CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Pradier C, Cornuau M, Norca J et al (2011) Differences in breast carcinoma in situ between menopausal and premenopausal women. Anticancer Res 31:1783–1788PubMed Pradier C, Cornuau M, Norca J et al (2011) Differences in breast carcinoma in situ between menopausal and premenopausal women. Anticancer Res 31:1783–1788PubMed
44.
go back to reference Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC et al (1999) Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 6:546–552CrossRefPubMed Montgomery LL, Tran KN, Heelan MC et al (1999) Issues of regret in women with contralateral prophylactic mastectomies. Ann Surg Oncol 6:546–552CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I et al (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1692–1702CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I et al (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated by lumpectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:1692–1702CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ—The LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51:1497–1510. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.008 CrossRefPubMed Elshof LE, Tryfonidis K, Slaets L et al (2015) Feasibility of a prospective, randomised, open-label, international multicentre, phase III, non-inferiority trial to assess the safety of active surveillance for low risk ductal carcinoma in situ—The LORD study. Eur J Cancer 51:1497–1510. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejca.​2015.​05.​008 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Subsequent risk of ipsilateral and contralateral invasive breast cancer after treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: incidence and the effect of radiotherapy in a population-based cohort of 10,090 women
Authors
Lotte E. Elshof
Michael Schaapveld
Marjanka K. Schmidt
Emiel J. Rutgers
Flora E. van Leeuwen
Jelle Wesseling
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3973-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 3/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine