Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016

01-07-2016 | Epidemiology

Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ

Authors: Shi-Yi Wang, Jessica B. Long, Brigid K. Killelea, Suzanne B. Evans, Kenneth B. Roberts, Andrea Silber, Cary P. Gross

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Although preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can detect mammographically occult contralateral breast cancers (CBCs) among women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), the impact of MRI on the incidence of subsequent CBC events is unclear. We examined whether MRI use decreases CBC occurrences and detection of invasive disease among women who develop a CBC. Utilizing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare dataset, we assessed overall, synchronous (<6 months after primary cancer diagnosis), and subsequent (≥6 months after diagnosis, i.e., metachronous) CBC occurrence in women aged 67–94 years diagnosed with DCIS during 2004–2009, with follow-up through 2011. We applied a matched propensity score approach to compare the stage-specific incidence rate of CBC according to MRI use. Our sample consisted of 9166 beneficiaries, 1258 (13.7 %) of whom received preoperative MRI. After propensity score matching, preoperative MRI use was significantly associated with a higher synchronous CBC detection rate (108.6 vs. 29.7 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR] = 3.65; p < .001) with no significant differences in subsequent CBC rate (6.7 vs. 6.8 per 1000 person-years; HR = 0.90; p = .71). The 6-year cumulative incidence of any CBC (in situ plus invasive) remained significantly higher among women undergoing MRI, compared with those not undergoing MRI (9 vs. 4 %, p < .001). Women undergoing MRI also had a higher incidence of invasive CBC (4 vs. 3 %, p = .04). MRI use resulted in an increased detection of synchronous CBC but did not prevent subsequent CBC occurrence, suggesting that many of the undetected CBC lesions may not become clinically evident.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2010) Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009–2010. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, p 4 American Cancer Society (2010) Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009–2010. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, p 4
2.
go back to reference Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM et al (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 185:1–549 Virnig BA, Shamliyan T, Tuttle TM et al (2009) Diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 185:1–549
3.
go back to reference Bijker N, Meijnen P, Peterse JL et al (2006) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853–a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol 24:3381–3387CrossRefPubMed Bijker N, Meijnen P, Peterse JL et al (2006) Breast-conserving treatment with or without radiotherapy in ductal carcinoma-in situ: ten-year results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized phase III trial 10853–a study by the EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group. J Clin Oncol 24:3381–3387CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD et al (2005) Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 11:382–390CrossRefPubMed Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD et al (2005) Determination of the presence and extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J 11:382–390CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB et al (2007) MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet 370:485–492CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wang SY, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM et al (2013) variability of preoperative breast MRI utilization among older women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer. Breast J 19:627–636CrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Virnig BA, Tuttle TM et al (2013) variability of preoperative breast MRI utilization among older women with newly diagnosed early-stage breast cancer. Breast J 19:627–636CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO et al (2009) Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:193–201 Lehman CD, DeMartini W, Anderson BO et al (2009) Indications for breast MRI in the patient with newly diagnosed breast cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 7:193–201
8.
go back to reference Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27:5640–5649CrossRefPubMed Brennan ME, Houssami N, Lord S et al (2009) Magnetic resonance imaging screening of the contralateral breast in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of incremental cancer detection and impact on surgical management. J Clin Oncol 27:5640–5649CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pilewskie M, Olcese C, Eaton A et al (2014) Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1552–1560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pilewskie M, Olcese C, Eaton A et al (2014) Perioperative breast MRI is not associated with lower locoregional recurrence rates in DCIS patients treated with or without radiation. Ann Surg Oncol 21:1552–1560CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Pilewskie M, Kennedy C, Shappell C et al (2013) Effect of MRI on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1522–1529CrossRefPubMed Pilewskie M, Kennedy C, Shappell C et al (2013) Effect of MRI on the management of ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 20:1522–1529CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Davis KL, Barth RJ Jr, Gui J et al (2012) Use of MRI in preoperative planning for women with newly diagnosed DCIS: risk or benefit? Ann Surg Oncol 19:3270–3274CrossRefPubMed Davis KL, Barth RJ Jr, Gui J et al (2012) Use of MRI in preoperative planning for women with newly diagnosed DCIS: risk or benefit? Ann Surg Oncol 19:3270–3274CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kropcho LC, Steen ST, Chung AP et al (2012) Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 18:151–156CrossRefPubMed Kropcho LC, Steen ST, Chung AP et al (2012) Preoperative breast MRI in the surgical treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ. Breast J 18:151–156CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wang SY, Kuntz KM, Tuttle TM et al (2013) The association of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and multiple breast surgeries among older women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138:137–147CrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Kuntz KM, Tuttle TM et al (2013) The association of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and multiple breast surgeries among older women with early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 138:137–147CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2012) Multicentric and contralateral invasive tumors identified with pre-op MRI in patients newly diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J 18:420–427CrossRefPubMed Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG (2012) Multicentric and contralateral invasive tumors identified with pre-op MRI in patients newly diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast J 18:420–427CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Dawood S, Broglio K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2008) Development of new cancers in patients with DCIS: the M.D. Anderson experience. Ann Surg Oncol 15:244–249CrossRefPubMed Dawood S, Broglio K, Gonzalez-Angulo AM et al (2008) Development of new cancers in patients with DCIS: the M.D. Anderson experience. Ann Surg Oncol 15:244–249CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lagios MD, Silverstein MJ (2008) Ductal carcinoma in situ: through a glass, darkly. Ann Surg Oncol 15:16–17CrossRefPubMed Lagios MD, Silverstein MJ (2008) Ductal carcinoma in situ: through a glass, darkly. Ann Surg Oncol 15:16–17CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Seigneurin A, Francois O, Labarere J et al (2011) Overdiagnosis from non-progressive cancer detected by screening mammography: stochastic simulation study with calibration to population based registry data. BMJ 343:d7017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Seigneurin A, Francois O, Labarere J et al (2011) Overdiagnosis from non-progressive cancer detected by screening mammography: stochastic simulation study with calibration to population based registry data. BMJ 343:d7017CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Wang SY, Long JB, Killelea BK et al (2016) Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(4):321–328CrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Long JB, Killelea BK et al (2016) Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 34(4):321–328CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Broet P, de la Rochefordiere A, Scholl SM et al (1995) Contralateral breast cancer: annual incidence and risk parameters. J Clin Oncol 13(7):1578–1583PubMed Broet P, de la Rochefordiere A, Scholl SM et al (1995) Contralateral breast cancer: annual incidence and risk parameters. J Clin Oncol 13(7):1578–1583PubMed
23.
go back to reference Vichapat V, Garmo H, Holmqvist M et al (2012) Tumor stage affects risk and prognosis of contralateral breast cancer: results from a large Swedish-population-based study. J Clin Oncol 30(28):3478–3485CrossRefPubMed Vichapat V, Garmo H, Holmqvist M et al (2012) Tumor stage affects risk and prognosis of contralateral breast cancer: results from a large Swedish-population-based study. J Clin Oncol 30(28):3478–3485CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Bach PB, Guadagnoli E, Schrag D, et al (2002) Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care 40:IV-19-25 Bach PB, Guadagnoli E, Schrag D, et al (2002) Patient demographic and socioeconomic characteristics in the SEER-Medicare database applications and limitations. Med Care 40:IV-19-25
25.
go back to reference Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR et al (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36:8–27CrossRefPubMed Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR et al (1998) Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 36:8–27CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10(2):150–161CrossRefPubMed Austin PC (2011) Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat 10(2):150–161CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28:3083–3107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Austin PC (2010) Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 172:1092–1097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC (2010) Statistical criteria for selecting the optimal number of untreated subjects matched to each treated subject when using many-to-one matching on the propensity score. Am J Epidemiol 172:1092–1097CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Normand ST, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E et al (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398CrossRefPubMed Normand ST, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E et al (2001) Validating recommendations for coronary angiography following acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: a matched analysis using propensity scores. J Clin Epidemiol 54:387–398CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281CrossRefPubMed D’Agostino RB Jr (1998) Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med 17(19):2265–2281CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Gierisch JM, Myers ER, Schmit KM et al (2014) Prioritization of research addressing management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Intern Med 160:484–491CrossRefPubMed Gierisch JM, Myers ER, Schmit KM et al (2014) Prioritization of research addressing management strategies for ductal carcinoma in situ. Ann Intern Med 160:484–491CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 10;32(5):392–401 Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P, et al (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 10;32(5):392–401
34.
go back to reference Fancellu A, Turner RM, Dixon JM, Pinna A, Cottu P, Houssami N (2015) Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Bri J Surg 102(8):883–893CrossRef Fancellu A, Turner RM, Dixon JM, Pinna A, Cottu P, Houssami N (2015) Meta-analysis of the effect of preoperative breast MRI on the surgical management of ductal carcinoma in situ. Bri J Surg 102(8):883–893CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Sun P (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1(7):888–896CrossRefPubMed Narod SA, Iqbal J, Giannakeas V, Sopik V, Sun P (2015) Breast cancer mortality after a diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ. JAMA Oncol 1(7):888–896CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Morrow M, Freedman G (2006) A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14(3):363–378CrossRefPubMed Morrow M, Freedman G (2006) A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14(3):363–378CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging and contralateral breast cancer occurrence among older women with ductal carcinoma in situ
Authors
Shi-Yi Wang
Jessica B. Long
Brigid K. Killelea
Suzanne B. Evans
Kenneth B. Roberts
Andrea Silber
Cary P. Gross
Publication date
01-07-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3858-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine