Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Epidemiology

Risk prediction for local versus regional/metastatic tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis treated by lumpectomy

Authors: Annette M. Molinaro, Jennette D. Sison, Britt-Marie Ljung, Thea D. Tlsty, Karla Kerlikowske

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), we identified factors associated with local invasive cancer (LIC) and regional/metastatic invasive cancer (RMIC) and provide 10-year risks based on clinically relevant factors. We created a retrospective, population-based cohort of 1492 women with an initial diagnosis of DCIS (1983–1996) treated by lumpectomy alone. Histological and molecular markers (Ki67, ER, PR, COX-2, p16, ERBB2) were collected on DCIS cases with a subsequent tumor (DCIS, LIC, or RMIC) and a subsample of frequency-matched controls without subsequent tumors. Competing risks methods were used to identify factors associated with LIC and RMIC and cumulative incidence methods to estimate 10-year risks for combinations of factors. Median follow-up time was 12.6 years (range 0.5–29.5 years). The overall 10-year risk of LIC (11.9 %) was higher than for RMIC (3.8 %). About half of women with initial DCIS lesions are detected by mammography and p16 negative and have a 10-year risk of LIC of 6.2 % (95 % CI 5.8–6.8 %) and RMIC of 1.2 % (95 % CI 1.1–1.3 %). Premenopausal women whose DCIS lesion was p16 positive or p16 negative and detected by palpation had high 10-year risk of LIC of 23.0 % (95 % CI 19.3–27.4 %). Ten-year risk of RMIC was highest at 22.5 % (95 % CI 13.8–48.1 %) for those positive for p16, COX-2, and ERRB2, and negative for ER, but prevalence of this group is low at 3 %. Ten-year risk of LIC and RMIC is low for the majority diagnosed with DCIS. Combinations of molecular markers and method of detection of initial DCIS lesion can differentiate women at low and high risk of LIC and RMIC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts & figures (2013-2014) In: American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts & figures (2013-2014) In: American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta
3.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K et al (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(20):1546–1554CrossRefPubMed Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, Zheng Y, Weaver DL, Cutter G, Yankaskas BC, Rosenberg R, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K et al (2002) Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(20):1546–1554CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (2010) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. JNCI 102(3):170–178CrossRefPubMed Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, Kane RL (2010) Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. JNCI 102(3):170–178CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, Hahn SM, Lee CN, Millon-Underwood S, Pike MC, Reed SD, Saftlas AF, Scarvalone SA et al (2010) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: diagnosis and management of DCIS September 22–24, 2009. JNCI 102(3):161–169CrossRefPubMed Allegra CJ, Aberle DR, Ganschow P, Hahn SM, Lee CN, Millon-Underwood S, Pike MC, Reed SD, Saftlas AF, Scarvalone SA et al (2010) National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: diagnosis and management of DCIS September 22–24, 2009. JNCI 102(3):161–169CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, Ljung BM, Ernster VL, Stewart K, Chew K, Moore DH, Waldman F (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with DCIS treated by lumpectomy. JNCI 95(22):1692–1702CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Molinaro A, Cha I, Ljung BM, Ernster VL, Stewart K, Chew K, Moore DH, Waldman F (2003) Characteristics associated with recurrence among women with DCIS treated by lumpectomy. JNCI 95(22):1692–1702CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R (2000) Mortality among women with DCIS of the breast in the population-based SEER program. Arch Intern Med 160(7):953–958CrossRefPubMed Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Wilkie H, Ballard-Barbash R (2000) Mortality among women with DCIS of the breast in the population-based SEER program. Arch Intern Med 160(7):953–958CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Costantino J, Poller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Margolese R et al (1998) Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 16(2):441–452PubMed Fisher B, Dignam J, Wolmark N, Mamounas E, Costantino J, Poller W, Fisher ER, Wickerham DL, Deutsch M, Margolese R et al (1998) Lumpectomy and radiation therapy for the treatment of intraductal breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-17. J Clin Oncol 16(2):441–452PubMed
10.
go back to reference Welch HG, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM (2008) The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ—the price of screening mammography. JNCI 100(4):228–229CrossRefPubMed Welch HG, Woloshin S, Schwartz LM (2008) The sea of uncertainty surrounding ductal carcinoma in situ—the price of screening mammography. JNCI 100(4):228–229CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Allred DC (2010) Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history. JNCI Monogr 2010(41):134–138CrossRef Allred DC (2010) Ductal carcinoma in situ: terminology, classification, and natural history. JNCI Monogr 2010(41):134–138CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Sanders ME, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Page DL (2005) The natural history of low-grade DCIS of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up. Cancer 103(12):2481–2484CrossRefPubMed Sanders ME, Schuyler PA, Dupont WD, Page DL (2005) The natural history of low-grade DCIS of the breast in women treated by biopsy only revealed over 30 years of long-term follow-up. Cancer 103(12):2481–2484CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Smith BD (2015) When is good enough really good enough? Defining the role of radiation in low-risk DCIS. JCO 33(7):686–691CrossRef Smith BD (2015) When is good enough really good enough? Defining the role of radiation in low-risk DCIS. JCO 33(7):686–691CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, Hankey B, Miller B, Clegg L, Edwards B (2000) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1997. In: Bethesda MD (ed) National Cancer Institute Ries L, Eisner M, Kosary C, Hankey B, Miller B, Clegg L, Edwards B (2000) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973–1997. In: Bethesda MD (ed) National Cancer Institute
15.
go back to reference Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R, Sarma D, Ryser MD, Myers ER, Hwang ES (2015) Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(12):djv263CrossRefPubMed Worni M, Akushevich I, Greenup R, Sarma D, Ryser MD, Myers ER, Hwang ES (2015) Trends in treatment patterns and outcomes for ductal carcinoma in situ. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(12):djv263CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Owen D, Tyldesley S, Alexander C, Speers C, Truong P, Nichol A, Wai ES (2013) Outcomes in patients treated with mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(3):e129–e134CrossRefPubMed Owen D, Tyldesley S, Alexander C, Speers C, Truong P, Nichol A, Wai ES (2013) Outcomes in patients treated with mastectomy for ductal carcinoma in situ. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85(3):e129–e134CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Harris JR, Morrow M (2009) Clinical dilemma of DCIS. JCO 27(32):5303–5305CrossRef Harris JR, Morrow M (2009) Clinical dilemma of DCIS. JCO 27(32):5303–5305CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Partridge A, Adloff K, Blood E, Dees EC, Kaelin C, Golshan M, Ligibel J, de Moor JS, Weeks J, Emmons K et al (2008) Risk perceptions and psychosocial outcomes of women with ductal carcinoma in situ: longitudinal results from a cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(4):243–251CrossRefPubMed Partridge A, Adloff K, Blood E, Dees EC, Kaelin C, Golshan M, Ligibel J, de Moor JS, Weeks J, Emmons K et al (2008) Risk perceptions and psychosocial outcomes of women with ductal carcinoma in situ: longitudinal results from a cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 100(4):243–251CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rakovitch E, Franssen E, Kim J, Ackerman I, Pignol J-P, Paszat L, Pritchard K, Ho C, Redelmeier D (2003) A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 77(3):285–293CrossRefPubMed Rakovitch E, Franssen E, Kim J, Ackerman I, Pignol J-P, Paszat L, Pritchard K, Ho C, Redelmeier D (2003) A comparison of risk perception and psychological morbidity in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and early invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 77(3):285–293CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Silverstein M (2003) The USC/Van Nuys Prognostic Index for DCIS of the breast. Am J Surg 186(4):337–343CrossRefPubMed Silverstein M (2003) The USC/Van Nuys Prognostic Index for DCIS of the breast. Am J Surg 186(4):337–343CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Molinaro AM, Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Waldman F, Bennington J, Sanchez H, Jimenez C, Stewart K, Chew K et al (2010) Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial DCIS diagnosis. JNCI 102(9):627–637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerlikowske K, Molinaro AM, Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Waldman F, Bennington J, Sanchez H, Jimenez C, Stewart K, Chew K et al (2010) Biomarker expression and risk of subsequent tumors after initial DCIS diagnosis. JNCI 102(9):627–637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, Butler SM, Hughes LL, Yoshizawa C, Cherbavaz DB, Shak S, Page DL, Sledge GW et al (2013) A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JNCI 105(10):701–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Solin LJ, Gray R, Baehner FL, Butler SM, Hughes LL, Yoshizawa C, Cherbavaz DB, Shak S, Page DL, Sledge GW et al (2013) A multigene expression assay to predict local recurrence risk for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JNCI 105(10):701–710CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Tamimi R, Baer H, Marotti J, Galan M, Galaburda L, Fu Y, Deitz A, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Colditz G et al (2008) Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tamimi R, Baer H, Marotti J, Galan M, Galaburda L, Fu Y, Deitz A, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Colditz G et al (2008) Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 10(4):R67CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Allred D, Harvey J, Berardo M, Clark G (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168PubMed Allred D, Harvey J, Berardo M, Clark G (1998) Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2):155–168PubMed
25.
go back to reference Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Miller C, Kozakeiwicz K, Chew K, Moore D, Rabban J, Chen YY, Kerlikowske K, Tlsty TD (2007) Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer Cell 12(5):479–491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Miller C, Kozakeiwicz K, Chew K, Moore D, Rabban J, Chen YY, Kerlikowske K, Tlsty TD (2007) Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer Cell 12(5):479–491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Gray R (2014) cmprsk: Subdistribution analysis of competing risks. In: R package version 2.2, 7 edn Gray R (2014) cmprsk: Subdistribution analysis of competing risks. In: R package version 2.2, 7 edn
27.
go back to reference Fine J, Gray R (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. JASA 5:190–207 Fine J, Gray R (1999) A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. JASA 5:190–207
28.
go back to reference Lostritto K, Strawderman RL, Molinaro AM (2012) A partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for creating survival risk groups. Biometrics 68(4):1146–1156CrossRefPubMed Lostritto K, Strawderman RL, Molinaro AM (2012) A partitioning deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for creating survival risk groups. Biometrics 68(4):1146–1156CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Molinaro AM, Lostritto K, van der Laan M (2010) partDSA: deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for partitioning the covariate space in prediction. Bioinformatics 26(10):1357–1363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Molinaro AM, Lostritto K, van der Laan M (2010) partDSA: deletion/substitution/addition algorithm for partitioning the covariate space in prediction. Bioinformatics 26(10):1357–1363CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Pepe MS, Mori M (1993) Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? Stat Med 12(8):737–751CrossRefPubMed Pepe MS, Mori M (1993) Kaplan-Meier, marginal or conditional probability curves in summarizing competing risks failure time data? Stat Med 12(8):737–751CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, Baehner F, Saskin R, Butler S, Tuck A, Sengupta S, Elavathil L, Jani P et al (2015) A population-based validation study of the DCIS score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152(2):389–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rakovitch E, Nofech-Mozes S, Hanna W, Baehner F, Saskin R, Butler S, Tuck A, Sengupta S, Elavathil L, Jani P et al (2015) A population-based validation study of the DCIS score predicting recurrence risk in individuals treated by breast-conserving surgery alone. Breast Cancer Res Treat 152(2):389–398CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Phipps A, Buist DM, Malone K, Barlow W, Porter P, Kerlikowske K, Li C (2011) Family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives and triple-negative breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):671–678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Phipps A, Buist DM, Malone K, Barlow W, Porter P, Kerlikowske K, Li C (2011) Family history of breast cancer in first-degree relatives and triple-negative breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(3):671–678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Li C, Beaber E, Tang M-T, Porter P, Daling J, Malone K (2013) Reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive, triple-negative, and HER2-neu overexpressing breast cancer among women 20–44 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(2):579–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Li C, Beaber E, Tang M-T, Porter P, Daling J, Malone K (2013) Reproductive factors and risk of estrogen receptor positive, triple-negative, and HER2-neu overexpressing breast cancer among women 20–44 years of age. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(2):579–587CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I (2009) Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 302(151):1685–1692CrossRefPubMed Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I (2009) Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA 302(151):1685–1692CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk prediction for local versus regional/metastatic tumors after initial ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosis treated by lumpectomy
Authors
Annette M. Molinaro
Jennette D. Sison
Britt-Marie Ljung
Thea D. Tlsty
Karla Kerlikowske
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3814-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine