Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

01-06-2016 | Epidemiology

An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Authors: Dana Madorsky-Feldman, Miri Sklair-Levy, Tamar Perri, Yael Laitman, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Rita Schmutzler, Kerstin Rhiem, Jenny Lester, Beth Y. Karlan, Christian F. Singer, Tom Van Maerken, Kathleen Claes, Joan Brunet, Angel Izquierdo, Alex Teulé, Jong Won Lee, Sung-Won Kim, Banu Arun, Anna Jakubowska, Jan Lubinski, Katherine Tucker, Nicola K. Poplawski, Liliana Varesco, Luigina Ada Bonelli, Saundra S. Buys, Gillian Mitchell, Marc Tischkowitz, Anne-Marie Gerdes, Caroline Seynaeve, Mark Robson, Ava Kwong, Nadine Tung, Nalven Tessa, Susan M. Domchek, Andrew K. Godwin, Johanna Rantala, Brita Arver, Eitan Friedman

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Female BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and/or ovarian cancer, and are offered enhanced surveillance including screening from a young age and risk-reducing surgery (RRS)—mastectomy (RRM) and/or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). While there are established guidelines for early detection of breast cancer in high-risk women who have not undergone RRM, there are less developed guidelines after RRM. We evaluated the schemes offered before and after RRS in internationally diverse high-risk clinics. An e-mailed survey was distributed to high-risk clinics affiliated with CIMBA. Overall, 22 centers from 16 countries responded. Pre RRS surveillance schemes overwhelmingly included breast imaging (primarily MRI) from 18 to 30 years and clinical breast exam (CBE) at 6–12 month intervals. For ovarian cancer, all but 6 centers offered semiannual/annual gynecological exam, transvaginal ultrasound, and CA 125 measurements. Post RRM, most centers offered only annual CBE while 4 centers offered annual MRI, primarily for substantial residual breast tissue. After RRSO only 4 centers offered specific gynecological surveillance. Existing guidelines for breast/ovarian cancer detection in BRCA carriers are being applied pre RRS but are not globally harmonized, and most centers offer no specific surveillance post RRS. From this comprehensive multinational study it is clear that evidence-based, long-term prospective data on the most effective scheme for BRCA carriers post RRS is needed.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Pappas M, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Okinaka-Hu L, Fu R (2014) Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 160(4):255–266CrossRefPubMed Nelson HD, Pappas M, Zakher B, Mitchell JP, Okinaka-Hu L, Fu R (2014) Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 160(4):255–266CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I, Perniola G, Musella A, Musio D et al (2014) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC Women’s Health 14:150–157. doi:10.1186/s12905-014-0150-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Marchetti C, De Felice F, Palaia I, Perniola G, Musella A, Musio D et al (2014) Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy: a meta-analysis on impact on ovarian cancer risk and all cause mortality in BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 mutation carriers. BMC Women’s Health 14:150–157. doi:10.​1186/​s12905-014-0150-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM, Carter J, Bae Jump VL, Prker LP et al (2015) Society of gynecologic oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer 121:2108–2120. doi:10.1002/cncr.29321 CrossRefPubMed Walker JL, Powell CB, Chen LM, Carter J, Bae Jump VL, Prker LP et al (2015) Society of gynecologic oncology recommendations for the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cancer 121:2108–2120. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​29321 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kramer JL, Velazquez IA, Chen BE, Rosenberg PS, Struewing JP, Greene MH (2005) Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8629–8635CrossRefPubMed Kramer JL, Velazquez IA, Chen BE, Rosenberg PS, Struewing JP, Greene MH (2005) Prophylactic oophorectomy reduces breast cancer penetrance during prospective, long-term follow-up of BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 23(34):8629–8635CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MG, Collée JM, van Doorn HC et al (2015) Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands. Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv033 Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Seynaeve C, van Asperen CJ, Ausems MG, Collée JM, van Doorn HC et al (2015) Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Research Group Netherlands. Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djv033
13.
go back to reference Ponder BA (1994) Setting up and running a familial cancer clinic. Br Med Bull 50(3):732–745PubMed Ponder BA (1994) Setting up and running a familial cancer clinic. Br Med Bull 50(3):732–745PubMed
14.
go back to reference Bancroft EK, Locke I, Ardern-Jones A, D’Mello L, McReynolds K, Lennard F et al (2010) The carrier clinic: an evaluation of a novel clinic dedicated to the follow-up of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers–implications for oncogenetics practice. J Med Genet 47(7):486–491. doi:10.1136/jmg.2009.072728 CrossRefPubMed Bancroft EK, Locke I, Ardern-Jones A, D’Mello L, McReynolds K, Lennard F et al (2010) The carrier clinic: an evaluation of a novel clinic dedicated to the follow-up of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers–implications for oncogenetics practice. J Med Genet 47(7):486–491. doi:10.​1136/​jmg.​2009.​072728 CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pichert G, Jacobs C, Jacobs I, Menon U, Manchanda R, Johnson M et al (2010) Novel one-stop multidisciplinary follow-up clinic significantly improves cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 carriers. Fam Cancer 9(3):313–319. doi:10.1007/s10689-010-9333-x CrossRefPubMed Pichert G, Jacobs C, Jacobs I, Menon U, Manchanda R, Johnson M et al (2010) Novel one-stop multidisciplinary follow-up clinic significantly improves cancer risk management in BRCA1/2 carriers. Fam Cancer 9(3):313–319. doi:10.​1007/​s10689-010-9333-x CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Knuttel FM, Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Gilhuijs KG, Peters NH (2014) Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. J Surg Oncol 110(1):26–31. doi:10.1002/jso.23655 CrossRefPubMed Knuttel FM, Menezes GL, van den Bosch MA, Gilhuijs KG, Peters NH (2014) Current clinical indications for magnetic resonance imaging of the breast. J Surg Oncol 110(1):26–31. doi:10.​1002/​jso.​23655 CrossRefPubMed
17.
18.
go back to reference Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Colin C, Cornford E et al, European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) (2015) The European Breast Cancer Coalition. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol 25(12):3669–3678. doi:10.1007/s00330-015-3807-z Mann RM, Balleyguier C, Baltzer PA, Bick U, Colin C, Cornford E et al, European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) (2015) The European Breast Cancer Coalition. Breast MRI: EUSOBI recommendations for women’s information. Eur Radiol 25(12):3669–3678. doi:10.​1007/​s00330-015-3807-z
19.
go back to reference Cott Chubiz JE, Lee JM, Gilmore ME, Kong CY, Lowry KP, Halpern EF et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Cancer 119(6):1266–1276. doi:10.1002/cncr.27864 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cott Chubiz JE, Lee JM, Gilmore ME, Kong CY, Lowry KP, Halpern EF et al (2013) Cost-effectiveness of alternating magnetic resonance imaging and digital mammography screening in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Cancer 119(6):1266–1276. doi:10.​1002/​cncr.​27864 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295(20):2374–2384CrossRefPubMed Plevritis SK, Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Daniel BL, Ikeda DM, Stockdale FE et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 295(20):2374–2384CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Pijpe A, Andrieu N, Easton DF, Kesminiene A, Cardis E, Noguès C, et al, GENEPSO; EMBRACE; HEBON (2012) Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). BMJ 345:e5660. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5660 Pijpe A, Andrieu N, Easton DF, Kesminiene A, Cardis E, Noguès C, et al, GENEPSO; EMBRACE; HEBON (2012) Exposure to diagnostic radiation and risk of breast cancer among carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: retrospective cohort study (GENE-RAD-RISK). BMJ 345:e5660. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​e5660
23.
go back to reference Giannakeas V, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Moller P, Armel S, Lynch HT et al (2014) Mammography screening and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147(1):113–118. doi:10.1007/s10549-014-3063-y CrossRefPubMed Giannakeas V, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Moller P, Armel S, Lynch HT et al (2014) Mammography screening and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147(1):113–118. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-014-3063-y CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Riedl CC, Luft N, Bernhart C, Weber M, Bernathova M, Tea MK et al (2015) Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. J Clin Oncol 33(10):1128–1135. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8626 CrossRefPubMed Riedl CC, Luft N, Bernhart C, Weber M, Bernathova M, Tea MK et al (2015) Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density. J Clin Oncol 33(10):1128–1135. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​56.​8626 CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Menon U, Ryan A, Kalsi J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Dawnay A, Habib M et al (2015) Risk algorithm using serial biomarker measurements doubles the number of screen-detected cancers compared with a single-threshold rule in the United Kingdom collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 33(18):2062–2071. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.59.4945 CrossRefPubMed Menon U, Ryan A, Kalsi J, Gentry-Maharaj A, Dawnay A, Habib M et al (2015) Risk algorithm using serial biomarker measurements doubles the number of screen-detected cancers compared with a single-threshold rule in the United Kingdom collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 33(18):2062–2071. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2014.​59.​4945 CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK et al (2015) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet S0140–6736(15):1224–1226. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6 Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK et al (2015) Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet S0140–6736(15):1224–1226. doi:10.​1016/​S0140-6736(15)01224-6
27.
go back to reference Greene MH, Piedmonte M, Alberts D, Gail M, Hensley M, Miner Z et al (2008) A prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(3):594–604. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2703 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Greene MH, Piedmonte M, Alberts D, Gail M, Hensley M, Miner Z et al (2008) A prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and longitudinal CA-125 screening among women at increased genetic risk of ovarian cancer: design and baseline characteristics: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17(3):594–604. doi:10.​1158/​1055-9965.​EPI-07-2703 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Jager A, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Koppert LB, Obdeijn IM et al (2013) Substantial breast cancer risk reduction and potential survival benefit after bilateral mastectomy when compared with surveillance in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective analysis. Ann Oncol 24(8):2029–2035. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdt134 CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA, Menke-Pluijmers MB, Jager A, Tilanus-Linthorst MM, Koppert LB, Obdeijn IM et al (2013) Substantial breast cancer risk reduction and potential survival benefit after bilateral mastectomy when compared with surveillance in healthy BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a prospective analysis. Ann Oncol 24(8):2029–2035. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdt134 CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Singer CF, Tea MK, Pristauz G, Hubalek M, Rappaport C, Riedl CC et al (2015) Clinical Practice Guideline for the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in women from HBOC (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) families. Wien Klin Wochenschr 127(23–24):981–986. doi:10.1007/s00508-015-0880-x CrossRefPubMed Singer CF, Tea MK, Pristauz G, Hubalek M, Rappaport C, Riedl CC et al (2015) Clinical Practice Guideline for the prevention and early detection of breast and ovarian cancer in women from HBOC (hereditary breast and ovarian cancer) families. Wien Klin Wochenschr 127(23–24):981–986. doi:10.​1007/​s00508-015-0880-x CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Meindl A, Ditsch N, Kast K, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2011) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108(19):323–330PubMedPubMedCentral Meindl A, Ditsch N, Kast K, Rhiem K, Schmutzler RK (2011) Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: new genes, new treatments, new concepts. Dtsch Arztebl Int 108(19):323–330PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
Authors
Dana Madorsky-Feldman
Miri Sklair-Levy
Tamar Perri
Yael Laitman
Shani Paluch-Shimon
Rita Schmutzler
Kerstin Rhiem
Jenny Lester
Beth Y. Karlan
Christian F. Singer
Tom Van Maerken
Kathleen Claes
Joan Brunet
Angel Izquierdo
Alex Teulé
Jong Won Lee
Sung-Won Kim
Banu Arun
Anna Jakubowska
Jan Lubinski
Katherine Tucker
Nicola K. Poplawski
Liliana Varesco
Luigina Ada Bonelli
Saundra S. Buys
Gillian Mitchell
Marc Tischkowitz
Anne-Marie Gerdes
Caroline Seynaeve
Mark Robson
Ava Kwong
Nadine Tung
Nalven Tessa
Susan M. Domchek
Andrew K. Godwin
Johanna Rantala
Brita Arver
Eitan Friedman
Publication date
01-06-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3805-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine