Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016

01-01-2016 | Epidemiology

Hormone replacement therapy after menopause and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers: a case–control study

Authors: Joanne Kotsopoulos, Tomasz Huzarski, Jacek Gronwald, Pal Moller, Henry T. Lynch, Susan L. Neuhausen, Leigha Senter, Rochelle Demsky, William D. Foulkes, Charis Eng, Beth Karlan, Nadine Tung, Christian F. Singer, Ping Sun, Jan Lubinski, Steven A. Narod

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 2/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Many BRCA1 mutation carriers undergo elective surgical oophorectomy (often before menopause) to manage their elevated risk of developing ovarian cancer. It is important to clarify whether or not the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) to mitigate the symptoms associated with surgical or natural menopause is safe in women with an inherited BRCA1 mutation and no personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. We conducted a case–control analysis of 432 matched pairs of women with a BRCA1 mutation. Detailed information on HRT use after menopause (duration, type, age at first/last use, formulation) was obtained from a research questionnaire administered at the time of study enrollment. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) associated with HRT use. The mean duration of HRT use after menopause was 4.3 years among the cases and 4.4 years among the controls (P = 0.83). The adjusted OR for breast cancer comparing all women who ever used HRT to those who never used HRT was 0.80 (95 % CI 0.55–1.16; P = 0.24). Findings did not differ by type of menopause (natural vs. surgical), by recency of use, by duration of use, and by formulation type. These findings suggest that a short course of HRT should not be contra-indicated for BRCA1 mutation carriers who have undergone menopause and who have no personal history of cancer.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1997) Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 350(9084):1047–1059CrossRef Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (1997) Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52,705 women with breast cancer and 108,411 women without breast cancer. Lancet 350(9084):1047–1059CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rossouw JE et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3):321–333CrossRefPubMed Rossouw JE et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3):321–333CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Chen WY et al (2004) Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 101(7):1490–1500CrossRefPubMed Chen WY et al (2004) Association of hormone replacement therapy to estrogen and progesterone receptor status in invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 101(7):1490–1500CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Beral V et al (2011) Breast cancer risk in relation to the interval between menopause and starting hormone therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(4):296–305PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Beral V et al (2011) Breast cancer risk in relation to the interval between menopause and starting hormone therapy. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(4):296–305PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Narod SA (2011) Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(11):669–676CrossRefPubMed Narod SA (2011) Hormone replacement therapy and the risk of breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(11):669–676CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Chlebowski RT et al (2013) Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(8):26–35CrossRef Chlebowski RT et al (2013) Estrogen plus progestin and breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 105(8):26–35CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Anderson GL et al (2012) Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13(5):476–486PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Anderson GL et al (2012) Conjugated equine oestrogen and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women with hysterectomy: extended follow-up of the Women’s Health Initiative randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13(5):476–486PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Reeves GK et al (2006) Hormonal therapy for menopause and breast-cancer risk by histological type: a cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7(11):910–918CrossRefPubMed Reeves GK et al (2006) Hormonal therapy for menopause and breast-cancer risk by histological type: a cohort study and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 7(11):910–918CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Clarke CA et al (2006) Recent declines in hormone therapy utilization and breast cancer incidence: clinical and population-based evidence. J Clin Oncol 24(33):e49–e50CrossRefPubMed Clarke CA et al (2006) Recent declines in hormone therapy utilization and breast cancer incidence: clinical and population-based evidence. J Clin Oncol 24(33):e49–e50CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Eheman CR et al (2009) The changing incidence of in situ and invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: United States, 1999–2004. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(6):1763–1769CrossRefPubMed Eheman CR et al (2009) The changing incidence of in situ and invasive ductal and lobular breast carcinomas: United States, 1999–2004. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 18(6):1763–1769CrossRefPubMed
13.
15.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR et al (2005) Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7804–7810CrossRefPubMed Rebbeck TR et al (2005) Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 23(31):7804–7810CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA et al (2015) Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(5):djv033CrossRefPubMed Heemskerk-Gerritsen BA et al (2015) Breast cancer risk after salpingo-oophorectomy in healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: revisiting the evidence for risk reduction. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(5):djv033CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Finch AP et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1547–1553PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Finch AP et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1547–1553PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA et al (2008) International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 122(9):2017–2022PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Metcalfe KA et al (2008) International variation in rates of uptake of preventive options in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Int J Cancer 122(9):2017–2022PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Finch A, Evans G, Narod SA (2012) BRCA carriers, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and menopause: clinical management considerations and recommendations. Women’s Health 8(5):543–555CrossRefPubMed Finch A, Evans G, Narod SA (2012) BRCA carriers, prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and menopause: clinical management considerations and recommendations. Women’s Health 8(5):543–555CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kotsopoulos J et al (2014) Timing of oral contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):579–586CrossRefPubMed Kotsopoulos J et al (2014) Timing of oral contraceptive use and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 143(3):579–586CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Widschwendter M et al (2013) The sex hormone system in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol 14(12):1226–1232CrossRefPubMed Widschwendter M et al (2013) The sex hormone system in carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations: a case-control study. Lancet Oncol 14(12):1226–1232CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Finch AP et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1547–1553PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Finch AP et al (2014) Impact of oophorectomy on cancer incidence and mortality in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 32(15):1547–1553PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Beral V, Million C (2003) Women Study, Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed Beral V, Million C (2003) Women Study, Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Pike MC et al (1993) Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 15(1):17–35PubMed Pike MC et al (1993) Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 15(1):17–35PubMed
25.
go back to reference Horwitz KB et al (2008) Rare steroid receptor-negative basal-like tumorigenic cells in luminal subtype human breast cancer xenografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(15):5774–5779PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Horwitz KB et al (2008) Rare steroid receptor-negative basal-like tumorigenic cells in luminal subtype human breast cancer xenografts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(15):5774–5779PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Horwitz KB, Sartorius CA (2008) Progestins in hormone replacement therapies reactivate cancer stem cells in women with preexisting breast cancers: a hypothesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(9):3295–3298PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Horwitz KB, Sartorius CA (2008) Progestins in hormone replacement therapies reactivate cancer stem cells in women with preexisting breast cancers: a hypothesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93(9):3295–3298PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gonzalez-Suarez E et al (2010) RANK ligand mediates progestin-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis. Nature 468(7320):103–107CrossRefPubMed Gonzalez-Suarez E et al (2010) RANK ligand mediates progestin-induced mammary epithelial proliferation and carcinogenesis. Nature 468(7320):103–107CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Joshi PA et al (2010) Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature 465(7299):803–807CrossRefPubMed Joshi PA et al (2010) Progesterone induces adult mammary stem cell expansion. Nature 465(7299):803–807CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Joshi PA et al (2015) RANK signaling amplifies WNT-responsive mammary progenitors through R-SPONDIN1. Stem Cell Rep 5(1):31–44CrossRef Joshi PA et al (2015) RANK signaling amplifies WNT-responsive mammary progenitors through R-SPONDIN1. Stem Cell Rep 5(1):31–44CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Mavaddat N et al (2012) Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the consortium of investigators of modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(1):134–147PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mavaddat N et al (2012) Pathology of breast and ovarian cancers among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the consortium of investigators of modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(1):134–147PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Kotsopoulos J et al (2005) Changes in body weight and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 7(5):R833–R843PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Kotsopoulos J et al (2005) Changes in body weight and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res 7(5):R833–R843PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kotsopoulos J et al (2005) Age at menarche and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Causes Control 16(6):667–674CrossRefPubMed Kotsopoulos J et al (2005) Age at menarche and the risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Causes Control 16(6):667–674CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kropp S et al (2007) Good agreement between physician and self-reported hormone therapy data in a case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol 60(12):1280–1287CrossRefPubMed Kropp S et al (2007) Good agreement between physician and self-reported hormone therapy data in a case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol 60(12):1280–1287CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Hormone replacement therapy after menopause and risk of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers: a case–control study
Authors
Joanne Kotsopoulos
Tomasz Huzarski
Jacek Gronwald
Pal Moller
Henry T. Lynch
Susan L. Neuhausen
Leigha Senter
Rochelle Demsky
William D. Foulkes
Charis Eng
Beth Karlan
Nadine Tung
Christian F. Singer
Ping Sun
Jan Lubinski
Steven A. Narod
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 2/2016
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-016-3685-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2016

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine