Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015

01-11-2015 | Brief Report

Explicating perceived barriers to mammography for the USCREEN project: concerns about breast implants, faith violations, and perceived recommendations

Authors: Jakob D. Jensen, Chelsea Ratcliff, Jeremy Weaver, Melinda M. Krakow, William Payton, Sherrie Loewen

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

In line with the health belief model, perceived barriers have proven to be a key determinant of intentions to screen for breast cancer. The standard measure of perceived barriers to breast cancer screening is an 11 item scale developed by Victoria Champion. However, perceived barriers emerge and change over time, and Champion’s perceived barriers scale was last revised in 1999. Moreover, the original scale did not address barriers which may be more pronounced in particular populations, such as congruity of action with faith. As part of the Utah Screening Project, a sample of women 40–74 (N = 341, Mage = 51.19, SD = 8.11) were recruited from four Utah counties in 2014 to complete a survey. The results revealed that the four new perceived barrier items explained 6.4 % of intentions to screen, above and beyond other predictors. In addition to barriers identified in past research, the current study identified several novel barriers including (a) concerns about negative effects to breast implants, (b) perceived conflict with faith, and the (c) perception that mammography is no longer recommended. The new perceived barriers items are useful to researchers interested in exploring barriers not addressed by the original instrument. The barriers also suggest potential belief-based targets and channels (e.g., plastic surgery clinics, faith-based interventions) for delivering mammography interventions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2013) Breast cancer facts and figures 2013–2014. American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta
2.
3.
go back to reference Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds.) (2013). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/ Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds.) (2013). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 19752011, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. Retrieved from http://​seer.​cancer.​gov/​csr/​1975_​2011/​
4.
go back to reference Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK (2009) Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 151:727–737PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK (2009) Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 151:727–737PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, DeBuono BA, Feldman JP, Smith RA, Kovenock D (1991) A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep 106(4):410PubMedCentralPubMed Fulton JP, Buechner JS, Scott HD, DeBuono BA, Feldman JP, Smith RA, Kovenock D (1991) A study guided by the health belief model of the predictors of breast cancer screening of women ages 40 and older. Public Health Rep 106(4):410PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hyman RB, Baker S, Ephraim R, Moadel A, Philip J (1994) Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization. J Behav Med 17(4):391–406CrossRefPubMed Hyman RB, Baker S, Ephraim R, Moadel A, Philip J (1994) Health Belief Model variables as predictors of screening mammography utilization. J Behav Med 17(4):391–406CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Champion V, Skinner CS (2003) Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. J Women’s Health 12:277–286CrossRef Champion V, Skinner CS (2003) Differences in perceptions of risk, benefits, and barriers by stage of mammography adoption. J Women’s Health 12:277–286CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jensen JD, King AJ, Carcioppolo N, Davis L (2012) Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. J Commun 62(5):851–868PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jensen JD, King AJ, Carcioppolo N, Davis L (2012) Why are tailored messages more effective? A multiple mediation analysis of a breast cancer screening intervention. J Commun 62(5):851–868PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Champion VL (1984) Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci 6(3):73–85CrossRef Champion VL (1984) Instrument development for health belief model constructs. Adv Nurs Sci 6(3):73–85CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Champion V (1995) Development of a benefits and barriers scale for mammography utilization. Cancer Nurs 18(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed Champion V (1995) Development of a benefits and barriers scale for mammography utilization. Cancer Nurs 18(1):53–59CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Menon U, Champion V, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Hui S, Sugg Skinner C (2003) Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. Am J Health Promot 21(4):255–261CrossRef Menon U, Champion V, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Hui S, Sugg Skinner C (2003) Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. Am J Health Promot 21(4):255–261CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Champion V (1999) Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health 22:341–348CrossRefPubMed Champion V (1999) Revised susceptibility, benefits, and barriers scale for mammography screening. Res Nurs Health 22:341–348CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Brown W, Pakenham KI (2004) Mammography screening distress and pain: changes over time and relations with breast symptoms, implants and cancer detection concerns. Psychol Health Med 9(4):403–410CrossRef Brown W, Pakenham KI (2004) Mammography screening distress and pain: changes over time and relations with breast symptoms, implants and cancer detection concerns. Psychol Health Med 9(4):403–410CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Benjamins MR, Trinitapoli J, Ellison CG (2006) Religious attendance, health maintenance beliefs, and mammography utilization: findings from a nationwide survey of Presbyterian women. J Sci Study Relig 45(4):597–607CrossRef Benjamins MR, Trinitapoli J, Ellison CG (2006) Religious attendance, health maintenance beliefs, and mammography utilization: findings from a nationwide survey of Presbyterian women. J Sci Study Relig 45(4):597–607CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Fox SA, Pitkin K, Paul C, Carson S, Duan N (1998) Breast cancer screening adherence: does church attendance matter? Health Educ Behav 25(6):742–758CrossRefPubMed Fox SA, Pitkin K, Paul C, Carson S, Duan N (1998) Breast cancer screening adherence: does church attendance matter? Health Educ Behav 25(6):742–758CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Katz ML, Kauffman RM, Tatum CM, Paskett ED (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47:227–236PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Katz ML, Kauffman RM, Tatum CM, Paskett ED (2008) Influence of church attendance and spirituality in a randomized controlled trial to increase mammography use among a low-income, tri-racial, rural community. J Relig Health 47:227–236PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Krakow MM, Jensen JD, Carcioppolo N, Weaver J, Liu M, Guntzviller LM (2015) Psychosocial predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination intentions for young women 18–26: religiosity, morality, promiscuity, and cancer worry. Women’s Health Issues 25(2):105–111CrossRefPubMed Krakow MM, Jensen JD, Carcioppolo N, Weaver J, Liu M, Guntzviller LM (2015) Psychosocial predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination intentions for young women 18–26: religiosity, morality, promiscuity, and cancer worry. Women’s Health Issues 25(2):105–111CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mitchell J, Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Swanson MS (2002) Religious beliefs and breast cancer screening. J Women’s Health 11(10):907–915CrossRef Mitchell J, Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Swanson MS (2002) Religious beliefs and breast cancer screening. J Women’s Health 11(10):907–915CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Howard DH, Adams EK (2012) Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendation. Prev Med 55(5):485–487CrossRefPubMed Howard DH, Adams EK (2012) Mammography rates after the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force screening recommendation. Prev Med 55(5):485–487CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL (2013) Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer 119(14):2518–2523CrossRefPubMed Pace LE, He Y, Keating NL (2013) Trends in mammography screening rates after publication of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Cancer 119(14):2518–2523CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Finney Rutten LJ, Ebbert JO, Jacobson DJ, Squiers LB, Fan C, Breitkopf CR, Roger VL, St. Sauver JL (2014) Changes in U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: effect on mammography screening in Olmsted County, MN 2004–2013. Prev Med 69:235–238CrossRefPubMed Finney Rutten LJ, Ebbert JO, Jacobson DJ, Squiers LB, Fan C, Breitkopf CR, Roger VL, St. Sauver JL (2014) Changes in U.S. preventive services task force recommendations: effect on mammography screening in Olmsted County, MN 2004–2013. Prev Med 69:235–238CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Finney Rutten LJ, Ebbert JO, Jacobsen DJ, Squiers LB, Fan C, Breitkopf CR, Roger VL, Sauver JL (2014) Changes in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations: effects on mammography screening in Olmsted County, MN 2004–2013. Prev Med 69:235–238CrossRefPubMed Finney Rutten LJ, Ebbert JO, Jacobsen DJ, Squiers LB, Fan C, Breitkopf CR, Roger VL, Sauver JL (2014) Changes in U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations: effects on mammography screening in Olmsted County, MN 2004–2013. Prev Med 69:235–238CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Evans A, Ureda J (2006) Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Education Behav 33(2):233–251CrossRef Tolma EL, Reininger BM, Evans A, Ureda J (2006) Examining the theory of planned behavior and the construct of self-efficacy to predict mammography intention. Health Education Behav 33(2):233–251CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Menon U, Champion V, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Hui S, Skinner CS (2007) Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. Am J Health Promot 21(4):255–261PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Menon U, Champion V, Monahan PO, Daggy J, Hui S, Skinner CS (2007) Health belief model variables as predictors of progression in stage of mammography adoption. Am J Health Promot 21(4):255–261PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Gail MH, Costantino JP, Pee D, Bondy M, Newman L, Selvam M, Bernstein L (2007) Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1782–1792CrossRefPubMed Gail MH, Costantino JP, Pee D, Bondy M, Newman L, Selvam M, Bernstein L (2007) Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1782–1792CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Champion V, Skinner CS, Menon U (2005) Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. Res Nurs Health 28:329–336CrossRefPubMed Champion V, Skinner CS, Menon U (2005) Development of a self-efficacy scale for mammography. Res Nurs Health 28:329–336CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Carpenter CJ (2010) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health communication 25(8):661–669CrossRefPubMed Carpenter CJ (2010) A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health communication 25(8):661–669CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Holt CL, Lukwago SN, Kreuter MW (2003) Spirituality, breast cancer beliefs and mammography utilization among urban African American women. J Health Psychol 8(3):383–396CrossRefPubMed Holt CL, Lukwago SN, Kreuter MW (2003) Spirituality, breast cancer beliefs and mammography utilization among urban African American women. J Health Psychol 8(3):383–396CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Explicating perceived barriers to mammography for the USCREEN project: concerns about breast implants, faith violations, and perceived recommendations
Authors
Jakob D. Jensen
Chelsea Ratcliff
Jeremy Weaver
Melinda M. Krakow
William Payton
Sherrie Loewen
Publication date
01-11-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3581-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine