Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015

01-08-2015 | Clinical trial

The prognostic value of the neoadjuvant response index in triple-negative breast cancer: validation and comparison with pathological complete response as outcome measure

Authors: M. Jebbink, E. van Werkhoven, I. A. M. Mandjes, J. Wesseling, E. H. Lips, M.-J. T. D. F. Vrancken Peeters, C. E. Loo, G. S. Sonke, S. C. Linn, C. Falo Zamora, S. Rodenhuis

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The Neoadjuvant response index (NRI) has been proposed as a simple measure of downstaging by neoadjuvant treatment in breast cancer. It was previously found to predict recurrence-free survival (RFS) in triple-negative (TN) breast cancer. It was at least as accurate as the standard binary system, the absence or presence of a pathological complete remission (pCR), which is the commonly employed outcome measure. The NRI was evaluated in an independent consecutive series of patients to validate the previous findings. Univariable and multivariable analyses were done to assess the predictive value of clinical parameters and of the NRI for RFS. We combined the original and validation series of patients to build a multivariable predictive model for RFS after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TN breast cancer. The validation set (N = 108) confirmed that patients with a higher-than-median NRI (>0.7) had excellent RFS (P = 0.002), similar to that of patients who had achieved a pCR. Multivariable analysis in 191 patients showed that the NRI was a strong independent predictor of RFS (P = 0.0002), with N-stage (P = 0.001) and T-stage (P = 0.014) ranking second and third, respectively. Importantly, among patients who did not achieve a pCR (NRI values below 1), higher NRI values were still associated with better RFS. The NRI is a simple method and a practical tool to predict RFS in TN breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It adds prognostic information to the presence or absence of pCR and could be useful to compare the efficacies of different chemotherapy regimens.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:188–194CrossRefPubMed Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:188–194CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W et al (2008) Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol 26:814–819CrossRefPubMed Gralow JR, Burstein HJ, Wood W et al (2008) Preoperative therapy in invasive breast cancer: pathologic assessment and systemic therapy issues in operable disease. J Clin Oncol 26:814–819CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rigter LS, Loo CE, Linn SC et al (2013) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adaptation and serial MRI response monitoring in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 109:2965–2972PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Rigter LS, Loo CE, Linn SC et al (2013) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy adaptation and serial MRI response monitoring in ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 109:2965–2972PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD et al (2013) Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3623–3630CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Blohmer JU, Costa SD et al (2013) Response-guided neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3623–3630CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bonnefoi H, Litiere S, Piccart M et al (2014) Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Ann Oncol 25:1128–1136PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Bonnefoi H, Litiere S, Piccart M et al (2014) Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is an independent predictive factor irrespective of simplified breast cancer intrinsic subtypes: a landmark and two-step approach analyses from the EORTC 10994/BIG 1-00 phase III trial. Ann Oncol 25:1128–1136PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102CrossRefPubMed Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sachelarie I, Grossbard ML, Chadha M et al (2006) Primary systemic therapy of breast cancer. Oncologist 11:574–589CrossRefPubMed Sachelarie I, Grossbard ML, Chadha M et al (2006) Primary systemic therapy of breast cancer. Oncologist 11:574–589CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172CrossRefPubMed Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384:164–172CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M et al (2014) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto) dagger. Ann Oncol 25:2363–2372CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Loibl S, Untch M et al (2014) Survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab or everolimus for HER2-negative primary breast cancer (GBG 44-GeparQuinto) dagger. Ann Oncol 25:2363–2372CrossRef
10.
go back to reference von Minckwitz G, Puglisi F, Cortes J et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (TANIA): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1269–1278CrossRef von Minckwitz G, Puglisi F, Cortes J et al (2014) Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (TANIA): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1269–1278CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A et al (2013) Triple-negative breast cancer: bRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 108:2172–2177PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lips EH, Mulder L, Oonk A et al (2013) Triple-negative breast cancer: bRCAness and concordance of clinical features with BRCA1-mutation carriers. Br J Cancer 108:2172–2177PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rodenhuis S, Mandjes IA, Wesseling J et al (2010) A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 21:481–487CrossRefPubMed Rodenhuis S, Mandjes IA, Wesseling J et al (2010) A simple system for grading the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 21:481–487CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Rodenhuis S et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1331–1338CrossRefPubMed Loo CE, Teertstra HJ, Rodenhuis S et al (2008) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: initial results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1331–1338CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C et al (2007) Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:4414–4422CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2010) A nomogram based on the expression of Ki-67, steroid hormone receptors status and number of chemotherapy courses to predict pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 46:2216–2224CrossRefPubMed Colleoni M, Bagnardi V, Rotmensz N et al (2010) A nomogram based on the expression of Ki-67, steroid hormone receptors status and number of chemotherapy courses to predict pathological complete remission after preoperative chemotherapy for breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 46:2216–2224CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Abdel-Fatah TM, Ball G, Lee AH et al (2015) Nottingham Clinico-Pathological Response Index(NPRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Neo-ACT) accurately predicts clinical outcome in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21(5):1052–1062CrossRefPubMed Abdel-Fatah TM, Ball G, Lee AH et al (2015) Nottingham Clinico-Pathological Response Index(NPRI) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Neo-ACT) accurately predicts clinical outcome in locally advanced breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 21(5):1052–1062CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The prognostic value of the neoadjuvant response index in triple-negative breast cancer: validation and comparison with pathological complete response as outcome measure
Authors
M. Jebbink
E. van Werkhoven
I. A. M. Mandjes
J. Wesseling
E. H. Lips
M.-J. T. D. F. Vrancken Peeters
C. E. Loo
G. S. Sonke
S. C. Linn
C. Falo Zamora
S. Rodenhuis
Publication date
01-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3510-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine